Literature DB >> 29072897

Characterizing Nanoparticles in Biological Matrices: Tipping Points in Agglomeration State and Cellular Delivery In Vitro.

John W Wills1, Huw D Summers2, Nicole Hondow3, Aishwarya Sooresh4, Kenith E Meissner5,6, Paul A White7, Paul Rees2,8, Andy Brown3, Shareen H Doak1.   

Abstract

Understanding the delivered cellular dose of nanoparticles is imperative in nanomedicine and nanosafety, yet is known to be extremely complex because of multiple interactions between nanoparticles, their environment, and the cells. Here, we use 3-D reconstruction of agglomerates preserved by cryogenic snapshot sampling and imaged by electron microscopy to quantify the "bioavailable dose" that is presented at the cell surface and formed by the process of individual nanoparticle sequestration into agglomerates in the exposure media. Critically, using 20 and 40 nm carboxylated polystyrene-latex and 16 and 85 nm silicon dioxide nanoparticles, we show that abrupt, dose-dependent "tipping points" in agglomeration state can arise, subsequently affecting cellular delivery and increasing toxicity. These changes are triggered by shifts in the ratio of the total nanoparticle surface area to biomolecule abundance, with the switch to a highly agglomerated state effectively changing the test article midassay, challenging the dose-response paradigm for nanosafety experiments. By characterizing nanoparticle numbers per agglomerate, we show these tipping points can lead to the formation of extreme agglomeration states whereby 90% of an administered dose is contained and delivered to the cells by just the top 2% of the largest agglomerates. We thus demonstrate precise definition, description, and comparison of the nanoparticle dose formed in different experimental environments and show that this description is critical to understanding cellular delivery and toxicity. We further empirically "stress-test" the commonly used dynamic light scattering approach, establishing its limitations to present an analysis strategy that significantly improves the usefulness of this popular nanoparticle characterization technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agglomeration state; dosimetry; dynamic light scattering; nanomedicine; nanoparticle−biomolecule interactions; nanotoxicology; transmission electron microscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29072897     DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  6 in total

1.  Common Considerations for Genotoxicity Assessment of Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Rosalie K Elespuru; Shareen H Doak; Andrew R Collins; Maria Dusinska; Stefan Pfuhler; Mugimane Manjanatha; Renato Cardoso; Connie L Chen
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Analysis of complex, beam-sensitive materials by transmission electron microscopy and associated techniques.

Authors:  Martha Ilett; Mark S'ari; Helen Freeman; Zabeada Aslam; Natalia Koniuch; Maryam Afzali; James Cattle; Robert Hooley; Teresa Roncal-Herrero; Sean M Collins; Nicole Hondow; Andy Brown; Rik Brydson
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The origin of heterogeneous nanoparticle uptake by cells.

Authors:  Paul Rees; John W Wills; M Rowan Brown; Claire M Barnes; Huw D Summers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Understanding nano-engineered particle-cell interactions: biological insights from mathematical models.

Authors:  Stuart T Johnston; Matthew Faria; Edmund J Crampin
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-03-09

Review 5.  Extracellular Vesicles as an Efficient and Versatile System for Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Xuan T T Dang; Jayasinghe Migara Kavishka; Daniel Xin Zhang; Marco Pirisinu; Minh T N Le
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Application of automated electron microscopy imaging and machine learning to characterise and quantify nanoparticle dispersion in aqueous media.

Authors:  M Ilett; J Wills; P Rees; S Sharma; S Micklethwaite; A Brown; R Brydson; N Hondow
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.758

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.