Thomas Venet1, Ayoub Bey2, Pierre Campo3, Joël Ducourneau4, Quentin Mifsud4, Charles Hoffmann2, Aurélie Thomas3, Marc Mouzé-Amady5, Cécile Parietti-Winkler2. 1. National Research and Safety Institute for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases (INRS), Vandoeuvre, France (Ototoxicity and Neurotoxicity Laboratory). thomas.venet@inrs.fr. 2. Central Hospital, Nancy, France. 3. National Research and Safety Institute for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases (INRS), Vandoeuvre, France (Ototoxicity and Neurotoxicity Laboratory). 4. Lorraine University, Nancy, France (Hearing Aid Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy). 5. National Research and Safety Institute for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases (INRS), Vandoeuvre, France (Physiology, Movement and Work Laboratory).
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether call center dispatchers wearing headsets are subject to auditory fatigue at the end of a work shift. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data was gathered at times when call centers were busiest. All call operators wore a headset for up to 12 h. Acoustic environment and noise exposure under the headset were continuously recorded during the entire work shift. Variations in auditory parameters were assessed using pure-tone air-conduction audiometry and an objective test based on distortion product otoacoustic emissions - contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes (EchoScan test). Thirty-nine operators and 16 controls, all volunteers, were selected from 3 call centers (sales, assistance, and emergency) where all cognitive tasks were accomplished by phone and on computers. RESULTS: No acoustic shock was detected during the investigation. The highest normalized noise exposure (daily noise exposure level - L<sub>EX,8 h</sub>) measured was 75.5 dBA. No significant variation in auditory performances was detected with either pure-tone air-conduction audiometry or the EchoScan test. Nevertheless, dispatchers expressed a feeling of tiredness. CONCLUSIONS: For an equivalent diffuse field noise exposure, the use of a headset does not seem to worsen auditory fatigue for call center operators. The dispatcher's fatigue was probably due to the duration of the work shift or to the tasks they performed rather than to the noise exposure under a headset. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018;31(2):217-226. This work is available in Open Access model and licensed under a CC BY-NC 3.0 PL license.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether call center dispatchers wearing headsets are subject to auditory fatigue at the end of a work shift. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data was gathered at times when call centers were busiest. All call operators wore a headset for up to 12 h. Acoustic environment and noise exposure under the headset were continuously recorded during the entire work shift. Variations in auditory parameters were assessed using pure-tone air-conduction audiometry and an objective test based on distortion product otoacoustic emissions - contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes (EchoScan test). Thirty-nine operators and 16 controls, all volunteers, were selected from 3 call centers (sales, assistance, and emergency) where all cognitive tasks were accomplished by phone and on computers. RESULTS: No acoustic shock was detected during the investigation. The highest normalized noise exposure (daily noise exposure level - L<sub>EX,8 h</sub>) measured was 75.5 dBA. No significant variation in auditory performances was detected with either pure-tone air-conduction audiometry or the EchoScan test. Nevertheless, dispatchers expressed a feeling of tiredness. CONCLUSIONS: For an equivalent diffuse field noise exposure, the use of a headset does not seem to worsen auditory fatigue for call center operators. The dispatcher's fatigue was probably due to the duration of the work shift or to the tasks they performed rather than to the noise exposure under a headset. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018;31(2):217-226. This work is available in Open Access model and licensed under a CC BY-NC 3.0 PL license.
Authors: Małgorzata Wojciechowska; Aleksandra Jasielska; Michał Ziarko; Michał Sieński; Maciej Różewicki Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Vanessa Bohn; Thais C Morata; Simone Roggia; Fernanda Zucki; Benoît Pouyatos; Thomas Venet; Edward Krieg; Maria Renata José; Adriana B M de Lacerda Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-11 Impact factor: 4.614