| Literature DB >> 29072625 |
Chen Lan1,2, Jingan Chen3, Jingfu Wang4, Jianyang Guo5, Jia Yu6,7, Pingping Yu8, Haiquan Yang9, Yong Liu10,11.
Abstract
Circular bubble plume diffusers have been confirmed as an effective technology for the restoration of the deep water system, but have never been applied in sub-deep water system. In this study, circular bubble plume diffusers were used, for the first time, to restore water quality in the Aha Reservoir, a typical sub-deep reservoir in Southwest China. Axisymmetric intrusive gravity currents were formed with a horizontal radius of 250 m at the equilibrium depth and the intrusion of oxygen-enriched water occurred within the depth of 10-14 m, while thermal stratification remained intact. A total of 95% of the imported oxygen was dissolved, but most was consumed by organic matter and other reduced substances within the hypolimnion. The oxygen consumption of organic matter, NH₄⁺ and remaining reduced materials, accounted for 41.4-52.5%, 25% and 13.3-24.4% of the total imported oxygen, respectively. Compared with the control sites, dissolved oxygen level in the hypolimnion increased 3-4 times, and concentrations of NH₄⁺, total Fe and total Mn were reduced by 15.5%, 45.5% and 48.9%, respectively. A significant decrease in total phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations was observed in the experimental zone (0.04-0.02 mg/L and 1.9-1.7 mg/L, respectively). This indicates that circular bubble plumes have great potential for oxygenation of the hypolimnion and improving water quality in the sub-deep water system. Nevertheless, further efforts are needed to improve the discrete bubble model to elaborate the oxygen transmission dynamics and the plume formation processes in sub-deep water systems, incorporating oxygen consumption processes.Entities:
Keywords: bubble plume diffusers; consumption fate of oxygen; dissolved oxygen; sub-deep water system; water quality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29072625 PMCID: PMC5707937 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14111298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Study area (a) and sampling sites (b).
Figure 2Sketch map of the reaeration apparatus.
Figure 3Diagram of the equipment for the measurement of oxygen dissolution efficiency.
Figure 4Spatial variation of dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water column (a) before and (b) during operation of the apparatus.
Concentrations of NH4+ (mg/L), total Fe and total Mn (µg/L) at the sampling sites and the percentage net decrease of NH4+, total Fe and total Mn (PND, %) for the corresponding sites from July to September.
| Sites | July | September | PND | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH4+ | Total Fe | Total Mn | NH4+ | Total Fe | Total Mn | NH4+ | Total Fe | Total Mn | |
| In situ | 0.48–0.71 | 37.6–67.5 | 2.4–12.0 | 0.16–0.34 | 4.40–91.4 | 0.4–1.4 | 30–71 | 74–94 | 74–88 |
| NW4 | 0.47–0.54 | 8.10–45.4 | 0.8–1.5 | 0.08–0.27 | 0.10–13.4 | 0.2–0.4 | 49–84 | 94–99 | 53–86 |
| NE4 | 0.47–0.57 | 5.10–45.7 | 0.6–1.3 | 0.14–0.32 | 0.40–33.5 | 0.1–0.8 | 43–71 | 27–92 | 36–81 |
| SW4 | 0.56–0.59 | 11.3–42.4 | 1.1–4.6 | 0.14–0.32 | 3.30–10.8 | 0.3–0.5 | 46–76 | 79–91 | 74–88 |
| DB | 0.34–0.35 | 15.7–27.4 | 1.4–2.2 | 0.18–0.22 | 13.6–58.3 | 1.1–1.8 | 38–47 | 51–60 | 17–21 |
| JZH/DHP * | 0.42–0.45 | 23.3–29.7 | 1.8–2.1 | 0.14–0.34 | 11.4–33.0 | 1.0–1.2 | 19–69 | 10–51 | 35–49 |
DHP * represents the concentration and PND of NH4+ in the Site DHP.
Figure 5Spatial variation of temperature in the water column (a) before and (b) during operation of the apparatus.
Figure 6Variations of DO (a) before and (b) during operation of the apparatus, and T (c) before and (d) during operation of the apparatus in the water column during stratification.
Comparison of TP and TN concentrations (mg/L) in the studied area between 2015 and 2016.
| Jul. 2015 | Aug. 2015 | Sep. 2015 | Jul. 2016 | Aug. 2016 | Sep. 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Middle | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Bottom | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| AVG | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Upper | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Middle | 2.0 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Bottom | 2.1 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| AVG | 2.0 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
Figure 7Variations of total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) in the experimental zone and the control zone.
Student’s t-test results for TP and TN in water (a = 0.05).
| Jul. | Aug. | Sep. | Aug. & Sep. | Aug. & Sep. | Jul. | Jul. & Aug. | Aug. & Sep. | Jul. & Sep. | Jul. | Aug. & Sep. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E.Z. | E.Z. | E.Z. | E.Z. | C.S. | C.S. | E.Z. | E.Z. | E.Z. | E.Z. & C.S. | E.Z. & C.S. | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||
| 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 3.3 | 0.003 | 3.2 | 0.004 | 5.7 | 9 × 10‒6 | 0.28 | 0.8 | 8.3 | 1 × 10‒10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||
| 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 0.04 | 0.49 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 0.001 | |
represents the average value (mg/L), |t| represents the absolute value of the t-statistic, and p represents the probability value, respectively. E.Z. represents the experimental zone, C.S. represents the control sites. a = 0.05 represents the significance level.