| Literature DB >> 29071816 |
Banseok Kim1, Seung Tae Lee2, Sinyoung Kim3, Jong Rak Choi2, Hyun Ok Kim2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The DEL blood type, a very weak D variant, is a major concern in the field of transfusion medicine because of its potential to cause anti-D alloimmunization. We investigated the molecular basis of serologically D-negative phenotypes, including the DEL type, and the distribution of other blood group systems in the Korean population using the recently developed multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay.Entities:
Keywords: Genotype; Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; Rh-Hr blood-group system
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29071816 PMCID: PMC5700144 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.1.32
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Lab Med ISSN: 2234-3806 Impact factor: 3.464
Primers used for multiplex PCR and sequencing
| Method | Genomic target | Nucleotide sequence | Product size (bp) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multiplex PCR (set A) | F: CCACATGAACATGATGCACA | 127 | [ | |
| R: CAAACTGGGTATCGTTGCTG | ||||
| F: TAAGCAAAAGCATCCAA | 186 | [ | ||
| R: ATGGTGAGATTCTCCT | ||||
| Multiplex PCR (set B) | F: GTTGTAACCGAGTGCTGGGGATTC | 123 | [ | |
| R: TGCCGGCTCCGACGGTATC | ||||
| F: TCCACTTTCCACCTCCCTGC | 256 | [ | ||
| R: GCAGCCAACTTCCCCTGTG | ||||
| Multiplex PCR (internal control) | F: TGCCTTCCCAACCATTCCCTTA | 434 | [ | |
| R: CCACTCACGGATTTCTGTTGTGTTTC | ||||
| Sequencing | F: AGATACTGTCGTTTTGACACACAAT | 463 | In this study | |
| R: GCTGAGGACTGCAGATAGGG |
RhCE phenotype and RHD analysis using the MLPA assay
| Type of | RhCE phenotype | No. (%) of samples | Subtotal (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total deletion | ce | 60 (63.2) | 74 (77.9) | |
| cEe | 9 (9.5) | |||
| Cce | 5 (5.3) | |||
| Cce | 4 (4.2) | 4 (4.2) | ||
| Cce | 14 (14.7) | 17 (17.9) | ||
| CcEe | 3 (3.2) | |||
| Total | 95 (100) |
Abbreviations: MLPA, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
Genotype frequency of RBC antigens in the 95 RhD-negative samples
| Blood group system | Expected phenotypes | Genotype | Genotype frequency (%), n=95 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 MNS | M+N−S+s− | 0 (0) | |
| M+N−S+s+ | 7 (7.4) | ||
| M+N−S−s+ | 21 (22.1) | ||
| M+N+S+s− | 0 (0) | ||
| M+N+S+s+ | 6 (6.3) | ||
| M+N+S−s+ | 37 (38.9) | ||
| M−N+S+s− | 0 (0) | ||
| M−N+S+s+ | 0 (0) | ||
| M−N+S−s+ | 24 (25.3) | ||
| 005 Lutheran | Lu(a+b−) | 0 (0) | |
| Lu(a+b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| Lu(a−b+) | 95 (100) | ||
| 006 Kell | K+k− | 0 (0) | |
| K+k+ | 0 (0) | ||
| K−k+ | 95 (100) | ||
| Kp(a+b−) | 0 (0) | ||
| Kp(a+b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| Kp(a−b+) | 95 (100) | ||
| Js(a+b−) | 0 (0) | ||
| Js(a+b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| Js(a−b+) | 95 (100) | ||
| 008 Duffy | Fy(a+b−) | 80 (84.2) | |
| Fy(a+b+) | 13 (13.7) | ||
| Fy(a−b+) | 2 (2.1) | ||
| 009 Kidd | Jk(a+b−) | 25 (26.3) | |
| Jk(a+b+) | 48 (50.5) | ||
| Jk(a−b+) | 22 (23.2) | ||
| 010 Diego | Di(a+b−) | 0 (0) | |
| Di(a+b+) | 12 (12.6) | ||
| Di(a−b+) | 83 (87.4) | ||
| Wr(a+b−) | 0 (0) | ||
| Wr(a+b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| Wr(a−b+) | 95 (100) | ||
| 011 Yt | Yt(a+b−) | 95 (100) | |
| Yt(a+b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| Yt(a−b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| 013 Scianna | Sc:1,−2 | 95 (100) | |
| Sc:1,2 | 0 (0) | ||
| Sc:−1,2 | 0 (0) | ||
| 014 Dombrock | Do(a+b−) | 4 (4.2) | |
| Do(a+b+) | 15 (15.8) | ||
| Do(a−b+) | 78 (82.1) | ||
| Jo(a−) | 0 (0) | ||
| Gy(a−) | 0 (0) | ||
| Hy(−) | 0 (0) | ||
| 015 Colton | Co(a+b−) | 95 (100) | |
| Co(a+b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| Co(a−b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| 016 LW | Lw(a+b−) | 95 (100) | |
| Lw(a+b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| Lw(a−b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| 020 Gerbich | Ge:2,3,4 | 95 (100) | |
| Ge:−2,3,4 | 0 (0) | ||
| Ge:−2,−3,4 | 0 (0) | ||
| 021 Cromer | Cr(a+) | 95 (100) | |
| Cr(a−) | 0 (0) | ||
| 022 Knops | Kn(a+b−) | 95 (100) | |
| Kn(a+b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| Kn(a−b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| 023 Indian | In(a+b−) | 0 (0) | |
| In(a+b+) | 0 (0) | ||
| In(a−b+) | 95 (100) | ||
| 024 Ok | Ok(a+) | 95 (100) | |
| Ok(a−) | 0 (0) |