Literature DB >> 29071688

Flow Cytometric FRET Analysis of Protein Interactions.

László Ujlaky-Nagy1, Péter Nagy2, János Szöllősi1, György Vereb3.   

Abstract

In the past decades, investigation of protein-protein interactions in situ in living or intact cells has gained expanding importance as structure/function relationships proposed from bulk biochemistry and molecular modeling experiments required confirmation at the cellular level. Förster (fluorescence) resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based methods are excellent tools for determining proximity and supramolecular organization of biomolecules at the cell surface or inside the cell. This could well be the basis for the increasing popularity of FRET. In fact, the number of publications exploiting FRET has exploded since the turn of the millennium. Interestingly, most applications are microscope-based, and only a fraction employs flow cytometry, even though the latter offers great statistical power owed to the potentially huge number of individually measured cells. However, with the increased availability of multi-laser flow cytometers, strategies to obtain absolute FRET efficiencies can now be relatively facilely implemented. In this chapter, we intend to provide generally useable protocols for measuring FRET in flow cytometry. After a concise theoretical introduction, recipes are provided for successful labeling techniques and measurement approaches. The simple, quenching-based population-level measurement, the classic ratiometric, intensity-based technique providing cell-by-cell actual FRET efficiencies, and a more advanced version of the latter, allowing for cell-by-cell autofluorescence correction are described. An Excel macro pre-loaded with spectral data of the most commonly used fluorophores is also provided for easy calculation of average FRET efficiencies. Finally, points of caution are given to help design proper experiments and critically interpret the results.

Keywords:  FCET; Flow cytometry; Fluorescence resonance energy transfer; Förster resonance energy transfer; Molecular proximity; Protein interactions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29071688     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7346-0_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  7 in total

1.  Oncostatin M triggers brain inflammation by compromising blood-brain barrier integrity.

Authors:  Doryssa Hermans; Evelien Houben; Niels Hellings; Bieke Broux; Paulien Baeten; Helena Slaets; Kris Janssens; Cindy Hoeks; Baharak Hosseinkhani; Gayel Duran; Seppe Bormans; Elizabeth Gowing; Chloé Hoornaert; Lien Beckers; Wing Ka Fung; Horst Schroten; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Judith Fraussen; Ronald Thoelen; Helga E de Vries; Gijs Kooij; Stephanie Zandee; Alexandre Prat
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 15.887

2.  Probing ion channel macromolecular interactions using fluorescence resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  Sharen Rivas; Khadija Hanif; Nourdine Chakouri; Manu Ben-Johny
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Advanced FRET normalization allows quantitative analysis of protein interactions including stoichiometries and relative affinities in living cells.

Authors:  Bernhard Hochreiter; Markus Kunze; Bernhard Moser; Johannes A Schmid
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Inhibition of IRF5 cellular activity with cell-penetrating peptides that target homodimerization.

Authors:  Jaspreet Banga; Dinesh Srinivasan; Chia-Chi Sun; Cherrie D Thompson; Francesca Milletti; Kuo-Sen Huang; Shannon Hamilton; Su Song; Ann F Hoffman; Yajuan Gu Qin; Bharati Matta; Margaret LaPan; Qin Guo; Gang Lu; Dan Li; Hong Qian; David R Bolin; Lena Liang; Charles Wartchow; Jin Qiu; Michelle Downing; Satwant Narula; Nader Fotouhi; Julie A DeMartino; Seng-Lai Tan; Gang Chen; Betsy J Barnes
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 5.  Flow cytometry based-FRET: basics, novel developments and future perspectives.

Authors:  JiaWen Lim; Moritz Petersen; Maximilian Bunz; Claudia Simon; Michael Schindler
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 9.207

6.  Intracellular IRF5 Dimerization Assay.

Authors:  Cherrie D Sherman; Betsy J Barnes
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2021-05-20

7.  Oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancer enhances TRAIL sensitivity via death receptor 4 upregulation and lipid raft localization.

Authors:  Joshua D Greenlee; Maria Lopez-Cavestany; Nerymar Ortiz-Otero; Kevin Liu; Tejas Subramanian; Burt Cagir; Michael R King
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.