| Literature DB >> 29071464 |
Stelios Orfanos1,2, Timur Toygar3,4, Mark Berthold-Losleben3,5, Natalya Chechko3,5, Annette Durst3,5, Zacharias G Laoutidis3,6, Sebastian Vocke3,5, Caren Weidenfeld3,5, Frank Schneider3,5, Wolfram Karges7, Christian F Beckmann8,9, Ute Habel3,5, Nils Kohn3,8.
Abstract
The human brain depends mainly on glucose supply from circulating blood as an energy substrate for its metabolism. Most of the energy produced by glucose catabolism in the brain is used to support intrinsic communication purposes in the absence of goal-directed activity. This intrinsic brain function can be detected with fMRI as synchronized fluctuations of the BOLD signal forming functional networks. Here, we report results from a double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over study addressing changes in intrinsic brain activity in the context of very low, yet physiological, blood glucose levels after overnight fasting. Comparison of four major resting state networks in a fasting state and a state of elevated blood glucose levels after glucagon infusion revealed altered patterns of functional connectivity only in a small region of the posterior default mode network, while the rest of the networks appeared unaffected. Furthermore, low blood glucose was associated with changes in the right frontoparietal network after cognitive effort. Our results suggest that fasting has only limited impact on intrinsic brain activity, while a detrimental impact on a network related to attention is only observable following cognitive effort, which is in line with ego depletion and its reliance on glucose.Entities:
Keywords: Blood glucose; Default mode; ICA; Resting-state; Strength model; fMRI
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29071464 PMCID: PMC6063348 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-017-9777-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Imaging Behav ISSN: 1931-7557 Impact factor: 3.978
Fig. 1BGL under EC are displayed in red, BGLs in FC in blue. BGL were sampled approximately every 15 min. t0 refers to the time just before fMRI measurements began. t4 refers to the time just after fMRI measurements were completed. Blood glucose levels represent mean values. ***: p < 0.001. Graphic taken with permission from (Chechko et al. 2014)
Fig. 2Differences between EC and FC in the DMN displayed in the upper part of the figure; differences between R1 and R2 in FC in the right frontoparietal network in the lower part of the figure. Results are superimposed on a standard brain (MNI 152). Areas shown were stronger connected to the rest of the network in EC compared to FC (upper part) and during R1 compared to R2 (lower part). Both contrasts are TFCE corrected at p < 0.05
Significant differences in functional connectivity for the four resting state networks of interest
| Area | Hemisphere | Cluster extent | MNI coordinates |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| DMN; EC > FC | ||||||
| Superior parietal lobule (SPL) | L | 18 | -8 | -46 | 64 | 6.44 |
| DMN; FC > EC | ||||||
| No significant differences | ||||||
| Right frontoparietal network; R1 minus R2 in FC | ||||||
| Insula | R | 84 | 34 | -6 | -4 | 3.83 |
| Pallidum | R | 20 | -8 | -2 | 3.43 | |
| Insula | L | 66 | -36 | -16 | 6 | 4.07 |
| Inferior parietal lobule | L | 42 | -60 | -32 | 24 | 3.25 |
| Parietal operculum | L | 21 | -42 | -32 | 6 | 3.67 |
| Superior temporal gyrus | L | 19 | -60 | -28 | 4 | 3.47 |
| Right frontoparietal network; R2 minus R1 in FC | ||||||
| No significant differences | ||||||
Only the DMN and the right frontopariental network are listed as all other networks did not yield significant results. Clusters are listed with peak voxel location and respective local maxima (indented). For all peak voxel locations MNI coordinates and t-value are listed. Cluster extent is given in the peak voxel line only. Indented labels are local maxima of cluster above. All contrasts are TFCE-corrected at p < 0.05
EC elevated condition, FC fasting condition, R1 first resting state scan at beginning of study, R2 second resting state scan after 1 h of experimental tasks