Rama El Yafawi1, Joel A Wirth2. 1. Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, 04102, USA. 2. Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, 04102, USA. wirthj@mmc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prostacyclin pathway medications have been shown to be highly efficacious in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) through multiple prospective clinical trials and more than two decades of clinical experience. The strongest support for prostacyclin use in PAH management is with parenteral administration. Numerous risks and limitations of parenteral delivery systems as well as significant patient burdens restrict widespread parenteral use. Highly effective and tolerable oral prostacyclin preparations to manage PAH have long been sought. We review the development of the oral prostacyclin agents beraprost, treprostinil, and selexipag and including current indications and limitations. Research into new approaches to the management of PAH, expanding indications for existing agents, and development of novel agents are also discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Two oral prostacyclin pathway medications, oral treprostinil and selexipag, were FDA approved in December 2013 and 2015, respectively. Current guidelines recommend use of selexipag in WHO-FC II and III (class 1, level B recommendation) and oral treprostinil in WHO-FC III (class 2b, level B recommendation). The use of these medications is challenging due to complexity in dosing and their side effect profiles which limit patient tolerability and acceptance. There is a promising role for oral prostacyclin pathway medications in patients with PAH. Future investigations are underway of alternative dose regimens and transitioning from parenteral therapies in order to improve efficacy and tolerability.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prostacyclin pathway medications have been shown to be highly efficacious in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) through multiple prospective clinical trials and more than two decades of clinical experience. The strongest support for prostacyclin use in PAH management is with parenteral administration. Numerous risks and limitations of parenteral delivery systems as well as significant patient burdens restrict widespread parenteral use. Highly effective and tolerable oral prostacyclin preparations to manage PAH have long been sought. We review the development of the oral prostacyclin agents beraprost, treprostinil, and selexipag and including current indications and limitations. Research into new approaches to the management of PAH, expanding indications for existing agents, and development of novel agents are also discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Two oral prostacyclin pathway medications, oral treprostinil and selexipag, were FDA approved in December 2013 and 2015, respectively. Current guidelines recommend use of selexipag in WHO-FC II and III (class 1, level B recommendation) and oral treprostinil in WHO-FC III (class 2b, level B recommendation). The use of these medications is challenging due to complexity in dosing and their side effect profiles which limit patient tolerability and acceptance. There is a promising role for oral prostacyclin pathway medications in patients with PAH. Future investigations are underway of alternative dose regimens and transitioning from parenteral therapies in order to improve efficacy and tolerability.
Authors: Victor F Tapson; Fernando Torres; Fiona Kermeen; Anne M Keogh; Roblee P Allen; Robert P Frantz; David B Badesch; Adaani E Frost; Shelley M Shapiro; Kevin Laliberte; Jeffrey Sigman; Carl Arneson; Nazzareno Galiè Journal: Chest Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: N Nagaya; M Uematsu; Y Okano; T Satoh; S Kyotani; F Sakamaki; N Nakanishi; K Miyatake; T Kunieda Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: B W Christman; C D McPherson; J H Newman; G A King; G R Bernard; B M Groves; J E Loyd Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-07-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robyn J Barst; Michael McGoon; Vallerie McLaughlin; Victor Tapson; Stuart Rich; Lewis Rubin; Karlman Wasserman; Ronald Oudiz; Shelley Shapiro; Ivan M Robbins; Richard Channick; David Badesch; Barry K Rayburn; Robin Flinchbaugh; Jeff Sigman; Carl Arneson; Roger Jeffs Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-06-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Victor F Tapson; Zhi-Cheng Jing; Kai-Feng Xu; Lei Pan; Jeremy Feldman; David G Kiely; Eugene Kotlyar; C Shane McSwain; Kevin Laliberte; Carl Arneson; Lewis J Rubin Journal: Chest Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: D Mukerjee; D St George; B Coleiro; C Knight; C P Denton; J Davar; C M Black; J G Coghlan Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Robert Roscigno; Toby Vaughn; Stephanie Anderson; William Wargin; Thomas Hunt; Nicholas S Hill Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 3.017