Literature DB >> 29070988

Anti-Phosphohistone H3-Positive Mitoses Are Linked to Pathological Response in Neoadjuvantly Treated Breast Cancer.

Sylvia Timme1, Martin Sillem2, Peter Bronsert2, Lioudmila Bogatyreva3, Dieter Hauschke3, Axel Zur Hausen4, Martin Werner2, Elmar Stickeler5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated breast cancer (BC) core biopsies taken before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) by immunohistochemistry using anti-phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) antibody to determine mitosis, and correlated the results to clinicopathological data and histopathological regression of resected tumor specimens after NACT.
METHODS: 72 patients with either triple-negative (TN) or luminal type BC received NACT with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and Taxotere®. Tumor regression was analyzed in resected specimens; pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 22.2%. Immunohistochemistry with PHH3 was performed on biopsy samples taken before treatment, and mitotic figures were evaluated in 10 high-power fields (HPF).
RESULTS: PHH3-detected mitoses correlated significantly with tumor grading (p = 0.001). TNBC showed > 10 PHH3-positive mitoses/10 HPF significantly more frequently than luminal type BC (p = 0.003). Tumors with > 10 PHH3-positive mitoses/10 HPF achieved pCR significantly more often than those with ≤ 10 PHH3-positive mitoses/10 HPF (p = 0.031). Even luminal type BC with > 10 PHH3-positive mitoses/10 HPF was associated significantly with pCR compared to luminal type BC with ≤ 10 PHH3-positive mitoses/10 HPF (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSION: NACT with EC and Taxotere is suitable for strong proliferating TNBC and luminal BC (> 10 PHH3-positive mitoses/10 HPF). Immunohistochemical determination of mitoses using anti-PHH3 antibody is a simple and robust method for predicting therapy response to NACT in BC tissue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Mitotic count; Neoadjuvant therapy; PHH3

Year:  2017        PMID: 29070988      PMCID: PMC5649277          DOI: 10.1159/000463377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  30 in total

Review 1.  Proceedings of the consensus conference on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of the breast, April 26-28, 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Gordon F Schwartz; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Histone H3 phosphorylation and expression of cyclins A and B1 measured in individual cells during their progression through G2 and mitosis.

Authors:  G Juan; F Traganos; W M James; J M Ray; M Roberge; D M Sauve; H Anderson; Z Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1998-06-01

3.  Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors.

Authors:  Valentina Guarneri; Kristine Broglio; Shu-Wan Kau; Massimo Cristofanilli; Aman U Buzdar; Vicente Valero; Thomas Buchholz; Funda Meric; Lavinia Middleton; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Modern classification of breast cancer: should we stick with morphology or convert to molecular profile characteristics.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 5.  Ki67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential.

Authors:  Rinat Yerushalmi; Ryan Woods; Peter M Ravdin; Malcolm M Hayes; Karen A Gelmon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  [TNM classification of breast cancer: changes and comments on the 7th edition].

Authors:  H-P Sinn; B Helmchen; C H Wittekind
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Proliferation markers predictive of the pathological response and disease outcome of patients with breast carcinomas treated by anthracycline-based preoperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anne Vincent-Salomon; Alexandra Rousseau; Michel Jouve; Philippe Beuzeboc; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Paul Fréneaux; Christophe Rosty; Claude Nos; François Campana; Jerzy Klijanienko; Abir Al Ghuzlan; Xavier Sastre-Garau
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; W C Wood; A S Coates; R D Gelber; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  P Chollet; S Amat; H Cure; M de Latour; G Le Bouedec; M-A Mouret-Reynier; J-P Ferriere; J-L Achard; J Dauplat; F Penault-Llorca
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Utility of PHH3 in Evaluation of Mitotic Index in Breast Carcinoma and Impact on Tumor Grade.

Authors:  Elham Mirzaiian; Zahra Sadat Tabatabaei Ghods; Seyed Mohammad Tavangar; Binesh Emami; Maryam Oraie; Roya Safyari; Hiva Saffar
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-01-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.