| Literature DB >> 29070770 |
Kaho Teshima1, Jina Lee1, Ho To1, Takashi Kamada1, Akihiro Tazumi1, Haruna Hirano2, Minoru Maruyama3, Torata Ogawa4, Shinya Nagai1, Conny Turni5, Nobuyuki Tsutsumi1.
Abstract
An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using lipopolysaccharide extract as antigen was evaluated for detection of antibodies to Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serovar 15. The serovar 15 ELISA had a higher sensitivity and specificity than latex agglutination test for 63 and 80 sera from pigs experimentally infected and not infected with A. pleuropneumoniae, respectively. When the serovar 15 ELISA was applied to 454 field sera, high rates of seropositivity were found in pigs from farms infected with A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 15, but not in those from farms free of A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 15. The results suggest that the serovar 15 ELISA may be useful for the serological surveillance of infection with A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 15.Entities:
Keywords: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae; ELISA; LPS; pig; serovar 15
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29070770 PMCID: PMC5745173 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.17-0374
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of ELISA and LA for 143 sera
| ELISA result | LA result | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | |
| Sera from pigs experimentally infected with | 29 | 3 | 24 | 8 |
| Sera from pigs not infected with | 0 | 111 | 0 | 111 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 91 | 75 | ||
| Specificity (%) | 100 | 100 | ||
| Positive predictive value (%) | 100 | 100 | ||
| Negative predictive value (%) | 97 | 93 | ||
Fig. 1.Analysis of 63 and 80 sera from pigs experimentally infected and non-infected with A. pleuropneumoniae, respectively. Analysis was performed using an indirect ELISA with LPS from serovar 15 as antigen. Each bar represents ELISA titers (mean and SDs) of sera from pigs experimentally inoculated with particular serovar. The two last bars to the right represent pre-inoculation sera (n=40; CT1, control 1) and field sera collected from farms with no history of infection with serovars 3, 6, 8 and 15 (n=40; CT2, control 2) as negative controls, respectively. The dashed line indicates the cut-off value. Numbers in brackets indicate the number of positive sera by the serovar 15 ELISA per the number of sera tested for particular serovar.
Fig. 2.Comparison of titers between the ELISA and LA tests. The serum antibodies against A. pleuropneumoniae serovars 3, 6, 8 and 15 were measured by the ELISA and LA tests. The 143 serum samples (including the 80 negative control sera, 31 sera from pigs infected with serovars 1, 2, 5, 7 and 11; and 32 sera from pigs infected with serovars 3, 6, 8 and 15) were examined by the two tests. The ELISA titers of 143 sera were plotted against the corresponding LA titers. Good correlation was found between two tests. The regression line (an R-squared value=0.94) was calculated as follows: y (ELISA titer)=0.2081 ×log2 (LA titer) + 0.1812. The LPS antigen of A. pleuropneumoniae serovar 15 was extracted by using the lysozyme-phenol-water method.
The positive incidence of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serovar 15 antibodies using the ELISA test in field pig farms
| Farms(Number of farms) | The time of sample collection | Number of pigs tested(Sows + Growing pigsa)) | Number of positive pigs(Sows + Growing pigs) | Positive (%) | Mean ELISA titer in pigs tested | SDb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affected (2) | ||||||
| A | During the occurrence of the disease (2013) | 34 (16+18) | 20 (8+12) | 58.8 | 0.39 | 0.31 |
| Before the occurrence of the disease (2004–2012) | 72 (48+24) | 34 (24+10) | 47.2 | 0.26 | 0.19 | |
| Total | 106 (64+42) | 54 (32+22) | 50.9 | 0.36 | 0.28 | |
| B | During the occurrence of the disease (6/2015–9/2015) | 63 (23+40) | 60 (22+38) | 95.2 | 0.64 | 0.41 |
| Before the occurrence of the disease (2010–5/2015) | 70 (9+61) | 58 (9+49) | 82.9 | 0.66 | 0.35 | |
| Total | 133 (32+101) | 118 (31+87) | 88.7 | 0.66 | 0.36 | |
| Free (12) | 215 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
a) Growing pigs in Farm A and Farm B were 4–5 and 6 months of age, respectively. b) SD, standard deviation.