Adeline Dozois1, Lorrie Hampton2, Carlene W Kingston2, Gwen Lambert2, Thomas J Porcelli2, Denise Sorenson2, Megan Templin2, Shellie VonCannon2, Andrew W Asimos2. 1. From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Carolinas Health System, Charlotte, NC (A.D., A.W.A.); CHS Northeast (L.H.), CHS Pineville (G.L.), and Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (M.T.), Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, NC; Department of Neurology, Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (C.W.K., D.S., S.V.C.); and Mecklenburg Emergency Medical Services Agency, Charlotte, NC (T.J.P.). adeline.dozois@gmail.com. 2. From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Carolinas Health System, Charlotte, NC (A.D., A.W.A.); CHS Northeast (L.H.), CHS Pineville (G.L.), and Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (M.T.), Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, NC; Department of Neurology, Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (C.W.K., D.S., S.V.C.); and Mecklenburg Emergency Medical Services Agency, Charlotte, NC (T.J.P.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recently proposed American Heart Association/American Stroke Association EMS triage algorithm endorses routing patients with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic strokes directly to endovascular centers based on a stroke severity score. The predictive value of this algorithm for identifying LVO is dependent on the overall prevalence of LVO acute ischemic stroke in the EMS population screened for stroke, which has not been reported. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of patients transported by our county's EMS agency who were dispatched as a possible stroke or had a primary impression of stroke by paramedics. We determined the prevalence of LVO by reviewing medical record imaging reports based on a priori specified criteria. RESULTS: We enrolled 2402 patients, of whom 777 (32.3%) had an acute stroke-related diagnosis. Among 485 patients with acute ischemic stroke, 24.1% (n=117) had an LVO, which represented only 4.87% (95% confidence interval, 4.05%-5.81%) of the total EMS population screened for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the prevalence of LVO acute ischemic stroke in our EMS population screened for stroke was low. This is an important consideration for any EMS stroke severity-based triage protocol and should be considered in predicting the rates of overtriage to endovascular stroke centers.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recently proposed American Heart Association/American Stroke Association EMS triage algorithm endorses routing patients with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic strokes directly to endovascular centers based on a stroke severity score. The predictive value of this algorithm for identifying LVO is dependent on the overall prevalence of LVO acute ischemic stroke in the EMS population screened for stroke, which has not been reported. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of patients transported by our county's EMS agency who were dispatched as a possible stroke or had a primary impression of stroke by paramedics. We determined the prevalence of LVO by reviewing medical record imaging reports based on a priori specified criteria. RESULTS: We enrolled 2402 patients, of whom 777 (32.3%) had an acute stroke-related diagnosis. Among 485 patients with acute ischemic stroke, 24.1% (n=117) had an LVO, which represented only 4.87% (95% confidence interval, 4.05%-5.81%) of the total EMS population screened for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the prevalence of LVO acute ischemic stroke in our EMS population screened for stroke was low. This is an important consideration for any EMS stroke severity-based triage protocol and should be considered in predicting the rates of overtriage to endovascular stroke centers.
Authors: Yaqian Xu; Neal S Parikh; Boshen Jiao; Joshua Z Willey; Amelia K Boehme; Mitchell S V Elkind Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Kartik D Bhatia; Romain Briest; Robert Goetti; Richard Webster; Christopher Troedson; Russell C Dale; Prakash Muthusami; Christina Miteff; Ferdinand Miteff; John Worthington; Kylie Tastula; Timothy Ang; Ian Andrews Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 29.907
Authors: T Truc My Nguyen; Ido R van den Wijngaard; Jan Bosch; Eduard van Belle; Erik W van Zwet; Tamara Dofferhoff-Vermeulen; Dion Duijndam; Gaia T Koster; Els L L M de Schryver; Loet M H Kloos; Karlijn F de Laat; Leo A M Aerden; Stas A Zylicz; Marieke J H Wermer; Nyika D Kruyt Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Pauli E T Vuorinen; Jyrki P J Ollikainen; Pasi A Ketola; Riikka-Liisa K Vuorinen; Piritta A Setälä; Sanna E Hoppu Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 2.953