Literature DB >> 29070696

Structural Determinants Influencing the Potency and Selectivity of Indazole-Paroxetine Hybrid G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.

Renee Bouley1, Helen V Waldschmidt1, M Claire Cato1, Alessandro Cannavo1, Jianliang Song1, Joseph Y Cheung1, Xin-Qiu Yao1, Walter J Koch1, Scott D Larsen1, John J G Tesmer2.   

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) phosphorylate activated receptors to promote arrestin binding, decoupling from heterotrimeric G proteins, and internalization. GRK2 and GRK5 are overexpressed in the failing heart and thus have become therapeutic targets. Previously, we discovered two classes of GRK2-selective inhibitors, one stemming from GSK180736A, a Rho-associated coiled-coil containing kinase 1 (ROCK1) inhibitor, the other from paroxetine, a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor. These two classes of compounds bind to the GRK2 active site in a similar configuration but contain different hinge-binding "warheads": indazole and benzodioxole, respectively. We surmised from our prior studies that an indazole would be the stronger hinge binder and would impart increased potency when substituted for benzodioxole in paroxetine derivatives. To test this hypothesis, we synthesized a series of hybrid compounds that allowed us to compare the effects of inhibitors that differ only in the identity of the warhead. The indazole-paroxetine analogs were indeed more potent than their respective benzodioxole derivatives but lost selectivity. To investigate how these two warheads dictate selectivity, we determined the crystal structures of three of the indazole hybrid compounds (CCG224061, CCG257284, and CCG258748) in complex with GRK2-Gβγ Comparison of these structures with those of analogous benzodioxole-containing complexes confirmed that the indazole-paroxetine hybrids form stronger interactions with the hinge of the kinase but also stabilize a distinct conformation of the kinase domain of GRK2 compared with previous complexes with paroxetine analogs. This conformation is analogous to one that can be assumed by GRK5, at least partially explaining the loss in selectivity.
Copyright © 2017 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29070696      PMCID: PMC5691592          DOI: 10.1124/mol.117.110130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  31 in total

1.  Navigating the conformational landscape of G protein-coupled receptor kinases during allosteric activation.

Authors:  Xin-Qiu Yao; M Claire Cato; Emily Labudde; Tyler S Beyett; John J G Tesmer; Barry J Grant
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Differential functional expression of human myocardial G protein receptor kinases in left ventricular cardiac diseases.

Authors:  Nduna Dzimiri; Paul Muiya; Editha Andres; Zohair Al-Halees
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2004-04-12       Impact factor: 4.432

3.  Structures of rhodopsin kinase in different ligand states reveal key elements involved in G protein-coupled receptor kinase activation.

Authors:  Puja Singh; Benlian Wang; Tadao Maeda; Krzysztof Palczewski; John J G Tesmer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Control of myocardial contractile function by the level of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 in gene-targeted mice.

Authors:  H A Rockman; D J Choi; S A Akhter; M Jaber; B Giros; R J Lefkowitz; M G Caron; W J Koch
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-07-17       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Structure-Based Design of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors Based on Paroxetine.

Authors:  Helen V Waldschmidt; Kristoff T Homan; Marilyn C Cato; Osvaldo Cruz-Rodríguez; Alessandro Cannavo; Michael W Wilson; Jianliang Song; Joseph Y Cheung; Walter J Koch; John J G Tesmer; Scott D Larsen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Helen V Waldschmidt; Kristoff T Homan; Osvaldo Cruz-Rodríguez; Marilyn C Cato; Jessica Waninger-Saroni; Kelly M Larimore; Alessandro Cannavo; Jianliang Song; Joseph Y Cheung; Paul D Kirchhoff; Walter J Koch; John J G Tesmer; Scott D Larsen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  New Python-based methods for data processing.

Authors:  Nicholas K Sauter; Johan Hattne; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Nathaniel Echols
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2013-06-18

8.  Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine.

Authors:  Pavel V Afonine; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Nathaniel Echols; Jeffrey J Headd; Nigel W Moriarty; Marat Mustyakimov; Thomas C Terwilliger; Alexandre Urzhumtsev; Peter H Zwart; Paul D Adams
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2012-03-16

9.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21

10.  Phaser crystallographic software.

Authors:  Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  9 in total

1.  Structure-Based Design of Selective, Covalent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 5 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Rachel A Rowlands; M Claire Cato; Helen V Waldschmidt; Renee A Bouley; Qiuyan Chen; Larisa Avramova; Scott D Larsen; John J G Tesmer; Andrew D White
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 2.  Current progress, challenges and future prospects of indazoles as protein kinase inhibitors for the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Nitin Tandon; Vijay Luxami; Divya Kant; Runjhun Tandon; Kamaldeep Paul
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  A New Paroxetine-Based GRK2 Inhibitor Reduces Internalization of the μ-Opioid Receptor.

Authors:  Renee A Bouley; Zara Y Weinberg; Helen V Waldschmidt; Yu-Chen Yen; Scott D Larsen; Manojkumar A Puthenveedu; John J G Tesmer
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Targeting G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) to G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Sarah M Sulon; Jeffrey L Benovic
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res       Date:  2020-09-18

Review 5.  Designer Approaches for G Protein-Coupled Receptor Modulation for Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Laurel A Grisanti; Sarah M Schumacher; Douglas G Tilley; Walter J Koch
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 6.  Dynamic Opioid Receptor Regulation in the Periphery.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Jeske
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 7.  G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 (GRK2) as a Potential Therapeutic Target in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases.

Authors:  Cristina Murga; Alba C Arcones; Marta Cruces-Sande; Ana M Briones; Mercedes Salaices; Federico Mayor
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Aldosterone Jeopardizes Myocardial Insulin and β-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling via G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2.

Authors:  Alessandro Cannavo; Federica Marzano; Andrea Elia; Daniela Liccardo; Leonardo Bencivenga; Giuseppina Gambino; Claudia Perna; Antonio Rapacciuolo; Antonio Cittadini; Nicola Ferrara; Nazareno Paolocci; Walter J Koch; Giuseppe Rengo
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 9.  Sex/Gender- and Age-Related Differences in β-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling in Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Daniela Liccardo; Beatrice Arosio; Graziamaria Corbi; Alessandro Cannavo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.964

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.