Literature DB >> 29070472

[Breakthrough bleeding in adult patients with severe hemophilia A receiving low- and intermediate-dose FVIII for tertiary prophylaxis: characteristics and influencing factors].

Shi-Qiu Qiu1, Jin-Mu Zhuang, Xuan Zhou, Rui-Xue Yin, Zhu-Qin Liu, Fei Ma, Ying-Jia Li, Jing Sun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics of breakthrough bleeding in adult patients with severe hemophilia A (SHA) receiving low- and intermediate-dose FVIII for tertiary prophylaxis and explore the factors affecting the outcomes of the treatment.
METHODS: Forty-nine patients (mean age 31.53∓7.33 years) with SHA receiving tertiary prophylaxis FVIII treatment were divided into low-dose group (n=15) and intermediate-dose group (n=34). The data including clinical bleeding phenotype (Pre?AJBR), 72 h FVIII trough activity, and Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH) were recorded in all the patients, and Hemophilia Steward APP was used to record the bleeding episode and the treatment data. All the patients were followed up for at least 6 months.
RESULTS: In the low-dose and intermediate-dose groups, the number of joint bleeding (AJBR) episodes were 18.79∓13.03 and 9.28∓7.02 per year (P=0.016), and the proportions of spontaneous bleeding were 75.0% and 47.7%, respectively. The proportions of patients with target joint were 80% and 44%, target joint bleeding occurred in 59% and 41%, and cataract bleeding after 0-12 h of prophylactic injection occurred in 4.86% and 5.18% of the patients with a median breakthrough bleeding time of 40.08 h and 46.08 h (P=0.008), respectively. The proportions of patients with 72 h FVIII trough activity <1% were 44.4% and 34.8% in the two groups, respectively. AJBR was negatively correlated with the preventive dose consumed (r=-0.57, P=0.000, n=49) and FISH, but positively correlated with Pre-AJBR in the two groups (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Tertiary prophylaxis with low- and intermediate-dose FVIII is not sufficient to achieve the goal of preventing progression of joint disease in Chinese adult patients with SHA. Although the prophylactic dose is the most important factor to affect the treatment efficacy, other non-factor approaches may also help to improve the efficacy of the treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29070472      PMCID: PMC6743966     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  20 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of hemophilia.

Authors:  A Srivastava; A K Brewer; E P Mauser-Bunschoten; N S Key; S Kitchen; A Llinas; C A Ludlam; J N Mahlangu; K Mulder; M C Poon; A Street
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.287

2.  Effect of a single dose of the interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab on inflammation and troponin T release in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Ola Kleveland; Gabor Kunszt; Marte Bratlie; Thor Ueland; Kaspar Broch; Espen Holte; Annika E Michelsen; Bjørn Bendz; Brage H Amundsen; Terje Espevik; Svend Aakhus; Jan Kristian Damås; Pål Aukrust; Rune Wiseth; Lars Gullestad
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Definitions in hemophilia: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Authors:  V S Blanchette; N S Key; L R Ljung; M J Manco-Johnson; H M van den Berg; A Srivastava
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Short-term low-dose secondary prophylaxis for severe/moderate haemophilia A children is beneficial to reduce bleed and improve daily activity, but there are obstacle in its execution: a multi-centre pilot study in China.

Authors:  L Tang; R Wu; J Sun; X Zhang; X Feng; X Zhang; K-H Luke; M-C Poon
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 5.  Total joint arthroplasty in haemophilia.

Authors:  K Beeton; E C Rodriguez-Merchan; J Alltree
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 6.  Personalized prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A: challenges and achievements.

Authors:  Muhlis Cem Ar; Zafer Baslar; Teoman Soysal
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.929

7.  The effects of postponing prophylactic treatment on long-term outcome in patients with severe hemophilia.

Authors:  Kathelijn Fischer; Johanna G van der Bom; Eveline P Mauser-Bunschoten; Goris Roosendaal; Robert Prejs; Piet de Kleijn; Diederick E Grobbee; Marijke van den Berg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Meeting the challenges of haemophilia care and patient support in China and Brazil.

Authors:  Margareth C Ozelo; Márcia A P Matta; Renchi Yang
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 9.  Modern treatment of haemophilia.

Authors:  E Berntorp; V Boulyjenkov; D Brettler; M Chandy; P Jones; C Lee; J Lusher; P Mannucci; I Peak; K Rickard
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 9.408

10.  Severe hemophilia with mild bleeding phenotype: molecular characterization and global coagulation profile.

Authors:  E Santagostino; M E Mancuso; A Tripodi; V Chantarangkul; M Clerici; I Garagiola; P M Mannucci
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.824

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of replacement therapies with clotting factors in patients with hemophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carolina J Delgado-Flores; David García-Gomero; Stefany Salvador-Salvador; José Montes-Alvis; Celina Herrera-Cunti; Alvaro Taype-Rondan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.