| Literature DB >> 29069204 |
Bruno Barcellos Jacobsen1, Ana Paula Lima Leopoldo1, Jóctan Pimentel Cordeiro1, Dijon Henrique Salomé de Campos2, André Ferreira do Nascimento3, Mário Mateus Sugizaki3, Antônio Carlos Cicogna2, Carlos Roberto Padovani2, André Soares Leopoldo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Different types of high-fat and/or high-energy diets have been used to induce obesity in rodents. However, few studies have reported on the effects observed at the initial stage of obesity induced by high-fat feeding on cardiac functional and structural remodelling.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29069204 PMCID: PMC5729779 DOI: 10.5935/abc.20170151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol ISSN: 0066-782X Impact factor: 2.000
General characteristics, comorbidities and hormones
| Variables | Groups | |
|---|---|---|
| C (n = 19) | HF (n = 19) | |
| IBW, g | 148 ± 12 | 147 ± 12 |
| FBW, g | 290 ± 18 | 302 ± 22 |
| WG, g | 142 ± 10 | 155 ± 10 |
| Epididymal, g | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 5.6 ± 1.2 |
| Retroperitoneal, g | 5.4 ± 1.5 | 6.4 ± 1.7 |
| Visceral, g | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 4.9 ± 0.9 |
| BF, g | 14.1 ± 3.0 | 16.9 ± 3.2 |
| AI, % | 4.9 ± 1.0 | 5.6 ± 0.9 |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 182 ± 27 | 181 ± 21 |
| AUC, mg/dL/min | 2129 ± 193 | 230 8 ± 218 |
| T-Chol, mg/dL | 63.2 ± 10.4 | 68.3 ± 6.1 |
| HDL, mg/dL | 49.2 ± 7.7 | 52.9 ± 4.7 |
| LDL, mg/dL | 9.0 ± 1.7 | 10.4 ± 2.4 |
| SBP, mmHg | 127 ± 8 | 131 ± 14 |
| Insulin, ng/mL | 0.83 ± 0.16 | 1.16 ± 0.28 |
| Leptin, ng/mL | 2.34 ± 0.57 | 3.80 ± 1.26 |
Values are means ± SD; control (C) and high-fat diet (HF) groups; n: number; IBW: initial body weight; FBW: final body weight; WG: weight gain; BF: body fat; AI: adiposity index; AUC: area under the curve for glucose determined in insulin tolerance test (ITT); T-Chol: total cholesterol; HDL: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP: systolic blood pressure;
p < 0.05 vs. C. Student's t-test for independent samples.
Figure 1Morphological analysis of control (C) versus high-fat diet (HF) rats. A: Heart weight. B: Heart/final body weight ratio. C: Myocyte cross-sectional area (40× magnification lens); representative haematoxylin and eosin-stained left ventricular cross-sections from C and HF rats. D: Interstitial collagen volume fraction of myocardium (20× magnification lens) from C and HF rats; representative picrosirius red-stained left ventricular sections from C and HF rats. Arrows represent the interstitial collagen volume fraction of C and HF. Data presented as the mean ± SD. Student’s t test was used for independent samples. There are no differences between groups
Echocardiography data
| Variables | Groups | |
|---|---|---|
| C (n = 10) | HF (n= 10) | |
| HR, bpm | 341 ± 40 | 316 ± 22 |
| LVDD, mm | 7.85 ± 0.53 | 7.98 ± 0.37 |
| LVSD, mm | 3.66 ± 0.63 | 3.70 ± 0.44 |
| PWTd, mm | 1.47 ± 0.06 | 1.44 ± 0.07 |
| RWT | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.01 |
| AO, mm | 3.39 ± 0.14 | 3.53 ± 0.13 |
| LA, mm | 5.27 ± 0.32 | 5.39 ± 0.31 |
| LVM, g | 0.81 ± 0.06 | 0.83 ± 0.10 |
| FS endocardial, % | 53.6 ± 5.7 | 53.6 ± 4.5 |
| FS midwall, % | 33.0 ± 3.0 | 33.9 ± 3.7 |
| PWSV, mm/s | 40.38 ± 5.49 | 38.79 ± 3.05 |
| E-Wave (cm/s) | 94.5 ± 13.6 | 87.4 ± 3.9 |
| A-Wave (cm/s) | 67.4 ± 18.7 | 60.2 ± 4.7 |
| Mitral E/A | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
| EDT, ms | 42.0 ± 4.8 | 43.8 ± 4.9 |
| IVRT, ms | 20.4 ± 3.1 | 20.1 ± 3.8 |
Data presented as the mean ± standard deviation. C: control and HF: high-fat diet groups; n: number; HR: heart rate; LVDD: left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVSD: left ventricular end-systolic dimension; PWTd: posterior wall thickness in diastole; RWT: relative wall thickness; AO: aortic diameter; LA: left atrium; LVM: left ventricle mass; FS endocardial: fractional shortening; FS midwall: fractional shortening; PWSV: posterior wall shortening velocity;early (E-wave) and late (A-wave) diastolic mitral inflow; E/A: early-to-late diastolic mitral inflow ratio; EDT: E-wave deceleration time; IVRT: isovolumetric relaxation time;
p < 0.05 versus C (control). Student's t test for independent samples.
Figure 2Basal condition (A, B and C), post-rest contraction (D, E and F) and effects of increasing extracellular Ca2+ concentration (G, H and I ) in papillary muscles of control (C) and high-fat diet (HF) rats (white bars = C; black bars = HF; n = 19 in each condition). Maximum developed tension normalized percross-sectional area (DT) [g/mm2], negative (-dT/dt[g/mm2/s]) and positive (+dT/dt[g/mm2/s]) tension derivatives normalized per cross-sectional area. Data presented as the means ± SD. *p < 0.05 versus C. Student’s t-test for independent samples (A, B and C) and repeated-measures two-way ANOVA (D, E, F, G, H and I); Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test
Figure 3Cardiac protein expression by Western Blot. The data are means ± SD (n = 6 in each group); control (C) and high-fat diet (HF); A: L-type Ca2+ channel; B: Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA2a) and C: phospholamban (PLB). Student’s t-test for independent samples