Literature DB >> 29068923

Impact of Patient Subtype and Surgical Variables on Abdominoplasty Outcomes: A 12-Year Massachusetts General Hospital Experience.

Akhil K Seth1,2, Alex M Lin1,2, William G Austen1,2, Robert H Gilman1,2, Gregory G Gallico1,2, Amy S Colwell1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The traditional abdominoplasty is one of the most common surgical procedures performed. This study evaluates the impact of different surgical techniques and clinical patient factors on abdominoplasty outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing abdominoplasty was performed.
RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy-nine patients with a mean age of 43.7 years and a body mass index of 27 kg/m underwent abdominoplasty. The majority were women (92.9 percent), and massive weight loss was present in 34.8 percent. Abdominoplasty techniques included traditional (59.4 percent), belt lipectomy (17.9 percent), fleur-de-lis (16.4 percent), umbilical float (9.2 percent), and mini-abdominoplasty (2.8 percent). Half of the study population [n = 384 (49.3 percent)] had concurrent surgical procedures. Total complications (23.0 percent) consisted primarily of wound- and scar-related complications (15.3 percent). Approximately 60 percent of patients received heparin chemoprophylaxis, with overall thromboembolic and hematoma rates less than 1 percent. Univariate analysis revealed that massive weight loss (p = 0.04), fleur-de-lis (p = 0.03) or belt lipectomy (p = 0.05) techniques, and concurrent medial thigh lift (p < 0.001) all significantly increased complications. Previous scars, amount of weight loss, operative time, liposuction, and other concurrent procedures did not affect total complications. Male sex (OR, 1.96; p = 0.04), fleur-de-lis technique (OR, 1.71; p = 0.04), and medial thigh lift (OR, 3.3; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for total postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that abdominoplasty alone or in combination with liposuction and aesthetic breast surgery can be performed safely, with an acceptable complication profile. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29068923     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  4 in total

1.  A Comparative Analysis of Fleur-de-Lis and Traditional Panniculectomy after Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Adrienne N Christopher; Martin P Morris; Viren Patel; Harrison Davis; Robyn B Broach; John P Fischer
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Correcting Flank Skin Laxity and Dog Ear Plus Aggressive Liposuction: A Technique for Classic Abdominoplasty in Middle-Eastern Obese Women.

Authors:  Seyed Nejat Hosseini; Ali Ammari; Seyed Mehdi Mousavizadeh
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01

3.  Patient-reported Outcomes of Scar Impact: Comparing of Abdominoplasty, Breast Surgery, and Facial Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Stuti P Garg; Joshua P Weissman; Narainsai K Reddy; Jeffrey Varghese; Marco F Ellis; John Y S Kim; Robert D Galiano
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-10-12

4.  Abdominoplasty in the Massive Weight Loss Patient: Are Aesthetic Goals and Safety Mutually Exclusive?

Authors:  Richard J Restifo
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2021-04-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.