Liselot Kerpershoek1, Marjolein de Vugt1, Claire Wolfs1, Bob Woods2, Hannah Jelley2, Martin Orrell2, Astrid Stephan3, Anja Bieber3, Gabriele Meyer3, Geir Selbaek4, Ron Handels1,5, Anders Wimo5,6, Louise Hopper7, Kate Irving7, Maria Marques8, Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira8, Elisa Portolani9, Orazio Zanetti9, Frans Verhey1. 1. a Alzheimer Centrum Limburg , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands. 2. b Bangor University , Bangor , UK. 3. c Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE) , Institute of Health and Nursing sciences , Halle , Germany. 4. d Department of Geriatric Medicine , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway. 5. e Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden. 6. f Centre for Research & Development Uppsala University / City Council of Gävleborg , Gävle , Sweden. 7. g School of Nursing and Human Sciences , Dublin City University , Dublin , Ireland. 8. h CEDOC, Nova Medical School, Faculdade De Ciências Médicas , Universidade Nova De Lisboa , Lisbon , Portugal. 9. i Alzheimer's Research Unit-Memory Clinic , IRCCS Centro S. Giovanni di Dio , Milano , Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Actifcare (Access to timely formal care) study investigated needs of people with dementia and their families during the phase in which formal care is being considered, and examined whether higher need levels are related to lower quality of life (QOL). METHOD: From eight European countries 451 people with dementia and their carers participated. Needs were measured with the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly. QOL was measured with the QOL-AD, and carer quality of life was measured with the CarerQol. The relationship between needs and QOL was analysed with multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Needs were expressed in the domains of psychological distress, daytime activities, company and information. People with dementia rated their unmet needs significantly lower than their carers: the mean number of self-rated unmet needs was 0.95, whereas the mean proxy ratings were 1.66. For met needs, the self-rated mean was 5.5 and was 8 when proxy-rated. The level of needs reported was negatively associated with QOL for both. CONCLUSION: The study results show that informal carers reported almost twice as many needs as people with dementia. The domains in which needs are expressed should be the primary focus for interventions to support QOL. The perspectives of people with dementia are informative when identifying needs.
OBJECTIVE: The Actifcare (Access to timely formal care) study investigated needs of people with dementia and their families during the phase in which formal care is being considered, and examined whether higher need levels are related to lower quality of life (QOL). METHOD: From eight European countries 451 people with dementia and their carers participated. Needs were measured with the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly. QOL was measured with the QOL-AD, and carer quality of life was measured with the CarerQol. The relationship between needs and QOL was analysed with multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Needs were expressed in the domains of psychological distress, daytime activities, company and information. People with dementia rated their unmet needs significantly lower than their carers: the mean number of self-rated unmet needs was 0.95, whereas the mean proxy ratings were 1.66. For met needs, the self-rated mean was 5.5 and was 8 when proxy-rated. The level of needs reported was negatively associated with QOL for both. CONCLUSION: The study results show that informal carers reported almost twice as many needs as people with dementia. The domains in which needs are expressed should be the primary focus for interventions to support QOL. The perspectives of people with dementia are informative when identifying needs.
Entities:
Keywords:
(un)met needs; Dementia; informal carer; quality of life
Authors: Liselot Kerpershoek; Marjolein de Vugt; Claire Wolfs; Martin Orrell; Bob Woods; Hannah Jelley; Gabriele Meyer; Anja Bieber; Astrid Stephan; Geir Selbaek; Mona Michelet; Anders Wimo; Ron Handels; Kate Irving; Louise Hopper; Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira; Conceição Balsinha; Orazio Zanetti; Daniel Portolani; Frans Verhey Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Elizabeth G Birkenhäger-Gillesse; Wilco P Achterberg; Sarah I M Janus; Boudewijn J Kollen; Sytse U Zuidema Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Elżbieta Szlenk-Czyczerska; Marika Guzek; Dorota Emilia Bielska; Anna Ławnik; Piotr Polański; Donata Kurpas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Petra Baji; Werner B F Brouwer; Job van Exel; Dominik Golicki; Valentina Prevolnik Rupel; Zsombor Zrubka; László Gulácsi; Valentin Brodszky; Fanni Rencz; Márta Péntek Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 3.440