| Literature DB >> 29068408 |
Chao Ye1, Guang Ran2, Wei Zhou3, Qiang Shen4, Qijie Feng5, Jianxin Lin6.
Abstract
Single crystal 6H-SiC wafers with 4° off-axis [0001] orientation were irradiated with carbon ions and then annealed at 900 °C for different time periods. The microstructure and surface morphology of these samples were investigated by grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Ion irradiation induced SiC amorphization, but the surface was smooth and did not have special structures. During the annealing process, the amorphous SiC was recrystallized to form columnar crystals that had a large amount of twin structures. The longer the annealing time was, the greater the amount of recrystallized SiC would be. The recrystallization volume fraction was accorded with the law of the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami equation. The surface morphology consisted of tiny pieces with an average width of approximately 30 nm in the annealed SiC. The volume shrinkage of irradiated SiC layer and the anisotropy of newly born crystals during annealing process produced internal stress and then induced not only a large number of dislocation walls in the non-irradiated layer but also the initiation and propagation of the cracks. The direction of dislocation walls was perpendicular to the growth direction of the columnar crystal. The longer the annealing time was, the larger the length and width of the formed crack would be. A quantitative model of the crack growth was provided to calculate the length and width of the cracks at a given annealing time.Entities:
Keywords: SiC; annealing; ion irradiation; microstructure; surface crack
Year: 2017 PMID: 29068408 PMCID: PMC5706178 DOI: 10.3390/ma10111231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The distribution characteristics of irradiation damage and carbon concentration after 400 keV C+ ion irradiation with a fluene of 5 × 1016 C+/cm2 simulated by SRIM-2008 software with quick mode.
Sintering parameters of the C+ ion implanted 6H-SiC samples.
| Samples | #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annealing temperature (°C) | RT | 900 | 900 | 900 | 900 |
| Annealing time (h) | 0 | 0.5 | 2 | 5 | 10 |
Figure 2SEM images showing the surface morphology of the as-irradiated (a) and then annealed at 900 °C for 0.5 h (b), 2 h (d), and 10 h (f) 6H-SiC samples; (c) and (e) high magnification images of the characteristic area ‘A’ and ‘B’ in (b) and (d), respectively.
Figure 3Bright field TEM images of the as-irradiated (a) and then annealed at 900 °C for 0.5 h (b), 5 h (d) and 10 h (e) SiC samples. (c) and (f) HRTEM images of the characteristics regions marked letters ‘A’ and ‘B’ in (b) and (e), respectively.
Figure 4XRD patterns of the as-irradiated SiC sample and the irradiated samples annealed at 900 °C for 0.5 h and 2 h.
Figure 5Bright field TEM images of the irradiated samples annealed at 900 °C for 0.5 h (a) and 2 h (b); (c) HRTEM image of the irradiated sample annealed at 900 °C for 10 h.
Measurement values of the characteristic parameters in the SiC layer.
| Sample | Length of Crack (nm) | Width of Crack (nm) | Depth of Damage Layer (nm) | Recrystallization Volume Fraction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0 | 0 | 700 | 0 |
| #2 | 0 | 0 | 640 | 0.67 |
| #3 | 42 | 50 | 620 | 0.88 |
| #4 | 1253 | 165 | 612 | 0.98 |
| #5 | 1357 | 200 | 610 | 1 |
Figure 6Curves of the characteristic parameters in Table 2 vs. annealing time, (a) Recrystallization volume fraction vs. annealing time; (b) Length of crack vs. annealing time.