Jitske F Koenders1, Liselotte D de Mooij1, Jack M Dekker1,2,3, Martijn Kikkert1. 1. 1 Departement of Research, Arkin Mental Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. 2 Departement of Clinical Psychology, Free University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. 3 Depression Research Club, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research suggests that patients with a severe mental illness (SMI) are among the most social excluded in society. However, comparisons of social network composition and relationship satisfaction between SMI patients and a control group are rare. AIMS: Our aim was to compare differences in size, satisfaction and composition of the social network between patients with SMI and a control group. Potential sociodemographic and clinical risk factors in relation to social network size in SMI patients were explored. METHODS: The sample consisted of a control group ( N = 949) and SMI patients ( N = 211) who were under treatment in Dutch mental health care institutions. In these groups, network size, relationship satisfaction, sociodemographic and clinical (patients only) characteristics were assessed. RESULTS: Social network size was 2.5 times lower in SMI patients, which was also reflected in a lower relationship satisfaction. The composition of the social network of SMI patients differs from that of controls: patients' network seems to consist of a smaller part of friends. Different risk factors were associated with the impoverishment of the social network of family, friends and acquaintances of patients with SMI. CONCLUSION: SMI patients have very small networks compared to controls. This may be a problem, given the ongoing emphasis on outpatient treatment of SMI patients and self-dependence. This outcome advocates for more attention to social isolation of SMI patients and involvement of family in the treatment and aftercare of SMI patients.
BACKGROUND: Research suggests that patients with a severe mental illness (SMI) are among the most social excluded in society. However, comparisons of social network composition and relationship satisfaction between SMI patients and a control group are rare. AIMS: Our aim was to compare differences in size, satisfaction and composition of the social network between patients with SMI and a control group. Potential sociodemographic and clinical risk factors in relation to social network size in SMI patients were explored. METHODS: The sample consisted of a control group ( N = 949) and SMI patients ( N = 211) who were under treatment in Dutch mental health care institutions. In these groups, network size, relationship satisfaction, sociodemographic and clinical (patients only) characteristics were assessed. RESULTS: Social network size was 2.5 times lower in SMI patients, which was also reflected in a lower relationship satisfaction. The composition of the social network of SMI patients differs from that of controls: patients' network seems to consist of a smaller part of friends. Different risk factors were associated with the impoverishment of the social network of family, friends and acquaintances of patients with SMI. CONCLUSION: SMI patients have very small networks compared to controls. This may be a problem, given the ongoing emphasis on outpatient treatment of SMI patients and self-dependence. This outcome advocates for more attention to social isolation of SMI patients and involvement of family in the treatment and aftercare of SMI patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Severe mental illness; relationship satisfaction; schizophrenia; social isolation; social network
Authors: Victoria J Block; Elisa Haller; Jeanette Villanueva; Andrea Meyer; Charles Benoy; Marc Walter; Undine E Lang; Andrew T Gloster Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-05-12
Authors: Liselotte D de Mooij; Martijn Kikkert; Jan Theunissen; Aartjan T F Beekman; Lieuwe de Haan; Pim W R A Duurkoop; Henricus L Van; Jack J M Dekker Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Menno Segeren; Steve Lauriks; Martijn Kikkert; Jet Heering; Nick Lommerse; Gwen van Husen; Arnoud Verhoeff Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.135