Renata F de Oliveira1, Ricardo S Goldman2, Fausto Medeiros Mendes3, Patricia Moreira de Freitas1. 1. Special Laboratory of Lasers in Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 2. Clínica de Cirurgia e Traumatologia Buco-Maxilo-Faciais, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 3. Department of Orthodontics and Pediatrics Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
Objective: The goal of this research was to observe the influence of electroacupuncture (EA) and laser-acupuncture on the return of tactile/pain sensitivity in patients who underwent orthognathic surgery. Materials and Methods:Thirty volunteers subjected to orthognathic surgery were evaluated and randomly divided into 2 groups, in which 3 treatments were evaluated: control (n = 30) (G0, medication + placebo laser treatment) and 2 experimental treatments (n = 15) (G1, medication + EA) or G2 (medication + laser-acupuncture). The control group had n = 30 because for each experimental treatment conducted on a volunteer's hemi-face, there was a control treatment on the other hemi-face. In G1, medication was given with EA, with needles placed at predetermined points (ST 4 [Dicang], M-HN-18 [Jiachengjiang], CV 24 [Chengjiang], ST 5 [Daying], ST 6 [Jiache], and point A1 [YNSA]). For electrostimulation, the device used delivered transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of a burst type, with intensity and frequency variations of T = 220 ms and F = 4 Hz (30 minutes, 2 × /week). In G2, in addition to the medication, laser irradiation (at 780 nm) was applied on acupuncture points (at 0.04 cm2, 70 mW, 6 s/point, 0.42 J/point, 10 J/cm2, 2 × /week). All volunteers were evaluated before and during the 4 months following the surgery. Tactile sensitivity was assessed by mechanical brushing (brush #s 2 and 12) and by a 2-point discrimination test, using a bow compass. A pain test was performed with a pulp electrical test that stimulates intact nerves of the dentin-pulp complex. A Kaplan-Meier test was performed, and survival curves were plotted for comparison between groups. Cox regression analysis was also conducted (α = 0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the groups for the 2-point discrimination test (brushes #2 and #12) on the buccal mucosa region and for the pulp test on all evaluated regions. However, the tactile test using brush #12 revealed significant differences between G1 and the other groups when considering the lower lip (P = 0.024) and chin (P = 0.028) areas. Conclusions: Only EA was able to influence-using the brushing test (brush #12)-the return of tactile sensitivity on the chin and lower lip positively after combined orthognathic surgery and genioplasty.
RCT Entities:
Objective: The goal of this research was to observe the influence of electroacupuncture (EA) and laser-acupuncture on the return of tactile/pain sensitivity in patients who underwent orthognathic surgery. Materials and Methods: Thirty volunteers subjected to orthognathic surgery were evaluated and randomly divided into 2 groups, in which 3 treatments were evaluated: control (n = 30) (G0, medication + placebo laser treatment) and 2 experimental treatments (n = 15) (G1, medication + EA) or G2 (medication + laser-acupuncture). The control group had n = 30 because for each experimental treatment conducted on a volunteer's hemi-face, there was a control treatment on the other hemi-face. In G1, medication was given with EA, with needles placed at predetermined points (ST 4 [Dicang], M-HN-18 [Jiachengjiang], CV 24 [Chengjiang], ST 5 [Daying], ST 6 [Jiache], and point A1 [YNSA]). For electrostimulation, the device used delivered transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of a burst type, with intensity and frequency variations of T = 220 ms and F = 4 Hz (30 minutes, 2 × /week). In G2, in addition to the medication, laser irradiation (at 780 nm) was applied on acupuncture points (at 0.04 cm2, 70 mW, 6 s/point, 0.42 J/point, 10 J/cm2, 2 × /week). All volunteers were evaluated before and during the 4 months following the surgery. Tactile sensitivity was assessed by mechanical brushing (brush #s 2 and 12) and by a 2-point discrimination test, using a bow compass. A pain test was performed with a pulp electrical test that stimulates intact nerves of the dentin-pulp complex. A Kaplan-Meier test was performed, and survival curves were plotted for comparison between groups. Cox regression analysis was also conducted (α = 0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the groups for the 2-point discrimination test (brushes #2 and #12) on the buccal mucosa region and for the pulp test on all evaluated regions. However, the tactile test using brush #12 revealed significant differences between G1 and the other groups when considering the lower lip (P = 0.024) and chin (P = 0.028) areas. Conclusions: Only EA was able to influence-using the brushing test (brush #12)-the return of tactile sensitivity on the chin and lower lip positively after combined orthognathic surgery and genioplasty.
Authors: Richard E Harris; Xiaoming Tian; David A Williams; Thomas X Tian; Thomas R Cupps; Frank Petzke; Kimberly H Groner; Pinaki Biswas; Richard H Gracely; Daniel J Clauw Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: P Svensson; L Baad-Hansen; M Pigg; T List; E Eliav; D Ettlin; A Michelotti; Y Tsukiyama; Y Matsuka; S K Jääskeläinen; G Essick; J D Greenspan; M Drangsholt Journal: J Oral Rehabil Date: 2011-01-17 Impact factor: 3.837