Literature DB >> 29066616

Precommitting to choose wisely about low-value services: a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.

Jeffrey Todd Kullgren1,2,3,4, Erin Krupka5, Abigail Schachter6, Ariel Linden7, Jacquelyn Miller4, Yubraj Acharya6, James Alford8, Richard Duffy9, Julia Adler-Milstein3,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how to discourage clinicians from ordering low-value services. Our objective was to test whether clinicians committing their future selves (ie, precommitting) to follow Choosing Wisely recommendations with decision supports could decrease potentially low-value orders.
METHODS: We conducted a 12-month stepped wedge cluster randomised trial among 45 primary care physicians and advanced practice providers in six adult primary care clinics of a US community group practice.Clinicians were invited to precommit to Choosing Wisely recommendations against imaging for uncomplicated low back pain, imaging for uncomplicated headaches and unnecessary antibiotics for acute sinusitis. Clinicians who precommitted received 1-6 months of point-of-care precommitment reminders as well as patient education handouts and weekly emails with resources to support communication about low-value services.The primary outcome was the difference between control and intervention period percentages of visits with potentially low-value orders. Secondary outcomes were differences between control and intervention period percentages of visits with possible alternate orders, and differences between control and 3-month postintervention follow-up period percentages of visits with potentially low-value orders.
RESULTS: The intervention was not associated with a change in the percentage of visits with potentially low-value orders overall, for headaches or for acute sinusitis, but was associated with a 1.7% overall increase in alternate orders (p=0.01). For low back pain, the intervention was associated with a 1.2% decrease in the percentage of visits with potentially low-value orders (p=0.001) and a 1.9% increase in the percentage of visits with alternate orders (p=0.007). No changes were sustained in follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Clinician precommitment to follow Choosing Wisely recommendations was associated with a small, unsustained decrease in potentially low-value orders for only one of three targeted conditions and may have increased alternate orders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02247050; Pre-results. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory care; decision making; decision support, clinical; health services research; primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29066616     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  11 in total

Review 1.  Defining and measuring imaging appropriateness in low back pain studies: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mark Yates; Crystian B Oliveira; James B Galloway; Chris G Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The Impact of Choosing Wisely Interventions on Low-Value Medical Services: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Betsy Q Cliff; Anton L V Avanceña; Richard A Hirth; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 3.  Behavioral Economics and Ambulatory Antibiotic Stewardship: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Alexandra R Richards; Jeffrey A Linder
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 3.637

4.  Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based recommendations for low back pain in clinical practice: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  Amanda M Hall; Samantha R Scurrey; Andrea E Pike; Charlotte Albury; Helen L Richmond; James Matthews; Elaine Toomey; Jill A Hayden; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Hospital doctors' attitudes to brief educational messages that aim to modify diagnostic test requests: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ben Young; Andrew W Fogarty; Rob Skelly; Dominick Shaw; Nigel Sturrock; Mark Norwood; Peter Thurley; Sarah Lewis; Tessa Langley; Jo Cranwell
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Trends in Low-Value Health Service Use and Spending in the US Medicare Fee-for-Service Program, 2014-2018.

Authors:  John N Mafi; Rachel O Reid; Lesley H Baseman; Scot Hickey; Mark Totten; Denis Agniel; A Mark Fendrick; Catherine Sarkisian; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

7.  Patient education materials to implement choosing wisely recommendations for internal medicine at the emergency department.

Authors:  Bart J Laan; Willemijn B Huiszoon; Frits Holleman; Marja A Boermeester; Karin A H Kaasjager; Suzanne E Geerlings
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-02

8.  Avoidable Adverse Events Related to Ignoring the Do-Not-Do Recommendations: A Retrospective Cohort Study Conducted in the Spanish Primary Care Setting.

Authors:  José Joaquín Mira; Irene Carrillo; Pastora Pérez-Pérez; Maria Pilar Astier-Peña; Johanna Caro-Mendivelso; Guadalupe Olivera; Carmen Silvestre; Mª Angeles Nuín; Jesús M Aranaz-Andrés
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 9.  What behaviour change techniques have been used to improve adherence to evidence-based low back pain imaging?

Authors:  Amanda Hall; Helen Richmond; Andrea Pike; Rebecca Lawrence; Holly Etchegary; Michelle Swab; Jacqueline Y Thompson; Charlotte Albury; Jill Hayden; Andrea M Patey; James Matthews
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Systematic review of clinician-directed nudges in healthcare contexts.

Authors:  Briana S Last; Alison M Buttenheim; Carter E Timon; Nandita Mitra; Rinad S Beidas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.