Literature DB >> 29066396

Serial correlations in single-subject fMRI with sub-second TR.

Saskia Bollmann1, Alexander M Puckett2, Ross Cunnington3, Markus Barth4.   

Abstract

When performing statistical analysis of single-subject fMRI data, serial correlations need to be taken into account to allow for valid inference. Otherwise, the variability in the parameter estimates might be under-estimated resulting in increased false-positive rates. Serial correlations in fMRI data are commonly characterized in terms of a first-order autoregressive (AR) process and then removed via pre-whitening. The required noise model for the pre-whitening depends on a number of parameters, particularly the repetition time (TR). Here we investigate how the sub-second temporal resolution provided by simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging changes the noise structure in fMRI time series. We fit a higher-order AR model and then estimate the optimal AR model order for a sequence with a TR of less than 600 ms providing whole brain coverage. We show that physiological noise modelling successfully reduces the required AR model order, but remaining serial correlations necessitate an advanced noise model. We conclude that commonly used noise models, such as the AR(1) model, are inadequate for modelling serial correlations in fMRI using sub-second TRs. Rather, physiological noise modelling in combination with advanced pre-whitening schemes enable valid inference in single-subject analysis using fast fMRI sequences.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Autocorrelation; Autoregressive model; Physiological noise; Simultaneous multislice (SMS); Variational Bayes; fMRI analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29066396     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  18 in total

1.  On the analysis of rapidly sampled fMRI data.

Authors:  Jingyuan E Chen; Jonathan R Polimeni; Saskia Bollmann; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Statistical power or more precise insights into neuro-temporal dynamics? Assessing the benefits of rapid temporal sampling in fMRI.

Authors:  Logan T Dowdle; Geoffrey Ghose; Clark C C Chen; Kamil Ugurbil; Essa Yacoub; Luca Vizioli
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  A circular echo planar sequence for fast volumetric fMRI.

Authors:  Christoph Rettenmeier; Danilo Maziero; Yongxian Qian; V Andrew Stenger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Functional Brain Response to Emotional Musical Stimuli in Depression, Using INLA Approach for Approximate Bayesian Inference.

Authors:  Parisa Naseri; Hamid Alavi Majd; Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaei; Naghmeh Khadembashi; Seyed Morteza Najibi; Atiye Nazari
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 5.  Imaging faster neural dynamics with fast fMRI: A need for updated models of the hemodynamic response.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Laura D Lewis
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  Combined lesion-deficit and fMRI approaches in single-case studies: Unique contributions to cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Carolina Deifelt Streese; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-02-09

7.  Accurate modeling of temporal correlations in rapidly sampled fMRI time series.

Authors:  Nadège Corbin; Nick Todd; Karl J Friston; Martina F Callaghan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Cluster failure revisited: Impact of first level design and physiological noise on cluster false positive rates.

Authors:  Anders Eklund; Hans Knutsson; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Accurate autocorrelation modeling substantially improves fMRI reliability.

Authors:  Wiktor Olszowy; John Aston; Catarina Rua; Guy B Williams
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Effective degrees of freedom of the Pearson's correlation coefficient under autocorrelation.

Authors:  Soroosh Afyouni; Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.