Literature DB >> 29066248

Comparison of Clinical Results and Injury Risk of Posterior Tibial Cortex Between Attune and Press Fit Condylar Sigma Knee Systems.

Sang Jun Song1, Cheol Hee Park2, Hu Liang2, Se Gu Kang1, Jong Jun Park1, Dae Kyung Bae1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared clinical and radiographic results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using Attune and Press Fit Condylar Sigma, and investigated whether use of the current prosthesis increased injury risk to the tibial cortex in Asian patients. We also assessed whether a preoperative posterior tibial slope angle (PSA) is associated with the injury when using the current prosthesis.
METHODS: The 300 TKAs with Attune (group A) were compared to the 300 TKAs with Press Fit Condylar Sigma (group B). Demographics were not different, except follow-up periods (24.8 vs 33.3 months, P < .001). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index and range of motion were compared. A minimum distance between tibial component stem and posterior tibial cortex (mDSC) was compared. The correlation between preoperative PSA and mDSC was analyzed in group A.
RESULTS: The postoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index and range of motion of group A were better than those of group B (17.7 vs 18.8, P = .004; 131.4° vs 129.0°, P = .008). The mDSC was shorter in group A (6.3 vs 7.0 mm, P < .001), which made up a higher proportion of the high-risk group for posterior tibial cortical injury with an mDSC of <4 mm (20.0% vs 10.7%, P = .002). A negative correlation was found between the preoperative PSA and mDSC in group A (r = -0.205, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The TKA using the current prosthesis provided more satisfactory results than the TKA using the previous prosthesis. However, the injury risk to the posterior tibial cortex increased in the knees with a large PSA when using the current prosthesis for Asian patients.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asian; arthroplasty; fracture; injury; knee; posterior tibial cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29066248     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Comparative retrieval analysis of a novel anatomic tibial tray backside: alterations in tibial component design and surface coating can increase cement adhesions and surface roughness.

Authors:  Dominic T Mathis; Joshua Schmidli; Felix Amsler; Johann Henckel; Harry Hothi; Alister Hart; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.562

2.  Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study.

Authors:  A Cerquiglini; J Henckel; H Hothi; P Allen; J Lewis; A Eskelinen; J Skinner; M T Hirschmann; A J Hart
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  Proximal tibial morphology and risk of posterior tibial cortex impingement in patients with AA-sized Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty tibial implants.

Authors:  Jiun-Ran Charng; Alvin Chao-Yu Chen; Yi-Shen Chan; Kuo Yao Hsu; Chen-Te Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Comparison of Patellofemoral Outcomes between Attune and PFC Sigma Designs: A Prospective Matched-Pair Analysis.

Authors:  Rajesh Navin Maniar; Nishit Bhatnagar; Rohan Bidwai; Ankur Dhiman; Debashish Chanda; Nishant Sanghavi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-03-16

5.  No reduced patellar loading with latest-generation cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty-a comparative study of Attune and Press-Fit Condylar®.

Authors:  Filippo-Franco Schiapparelli; Puja Ahmadi; Felix Amsler; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.