Yeonsu Song1,2, Stephanie L Harrison3, Jennifer L Martin1,2, Cathy A Alessi1,2, Sonia Ancoli-Israel4, Katie L Stone3, Lisa Fredman5. 1. VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, North Hills, California. 2. David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, California. 3. Research Institute, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California. 4. Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine whether change in caregiving status and intensity among community-dwelling older women was associated with sleep characteristics at follow-up, and whether perceived stress modified these associations. METHODS: The sample included 800 women aged 65 years or older who completed baseline and second follow-up interviews in the Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (Caregiver-SOF). Respondents were categorized into four groups based on change in caregiving status and intensity between the two time points: continuous noncaregivers, ceased caregivers, low-intensity caregivers (continuous caregivers with low/decreased intensity), and high-intensity caregivers (continuous caregivers with high/increased intensity or new caregivers). Perceived Stress Scale scores at the second follow-up were dichotomized into high versus low stress. Sleep outcomes at SOF Visit 8 (which overlapped with Caregiver-SOF second follow-up) included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total score; and actigraphy-measured total sleep time, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset, and sleep latency. RESULTS: Multivariate-adjusted sleep characteristics did not differ significantly across caregiving groups. Among high-intensity caregivers, however, those with high stress levels had significantly longer wake after sleep onset (mean 82.3 minutes, 95% confidence interval = 70.9-93.7) than those with low stress levels (mean 65.4 minutes, 95% confidence interval = 55.2-75.7). No other sleep outcomes were modified by stress levels. Further, higher stress was significantly associated with worse Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, regardless of the caregiving group. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, sleep characteristics did not differ among noncaregivers, ceased caregivers, or those with high-/low-intensity caregiving among older women. However, subgroups of caregivers may be vulnerable to developing sleep problems, particularly those with high stress levels.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine whether change in caregiving status and intensity among community-dwelling older women was associated with sleep characteristics at follow-up, and whether perceived stress modified these associations. METHODS: The sample included 800 women aged 65 years or older who completed baseline and second follow-up interviews in the Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (Caregiver-SOF). Respondents were categorized into four groups based on change in caregiving status and intensity between the two time points: continuous noncaregivers, ceased caregivers, low-intensity caregivers (continuous caregivers with low/decreased intensity), and high-intensity caregivers (continuous caregivers with high/increased intensity or new caregivers). Perceived Stress Scale scores at the second follow-up were dichotomized into high versus low stress. Sleep outcomes at SOF Visit 8 (which overlapped with Caregiver-SOF second follow-up) included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total score; and actigraphy-measured total sleep time, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset, and sleep latency. RESULTS: Multivariate-adjusted sleep characteristics did not differ significantly across caregiving groups. Among high-intensity caregivers, however, those with high stress levels had significantly longer wake after sleep onset (mean 82.3 minutes, 95% confidence interval = 70.9-93.7) than those with low stress levels (mean 65.4 minutes, 95% confidence interval = 55.2-75.7). No other sleep outcomes were modified by stress levels. Further, higher stress was significantly associated with worse Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, regardless of the caregiving group. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, sleep characteristics did not differ among noncaregivers, ceased caregivers, or those with high-/low-intensity caregiving among older women. However, subgroups of caregivers may be vulnerable to developing sleep problems, particularly those with high stress levels.
Authors: Lisa Fredman; Sharon Tennstedt; Kathleen A Smyth; Judith D Kasper; Baila Miller; Thomas Fritsch; Maura Watson; Emily L Harris Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2004
Authors: Nicole G Altman; Bilgay Izci-Balserak; Elizabeth Schopfer; Nicholas Jackson; Pinyo Rattanaumpawan; Philip R Gehrman; Nirav P Patel; Michael A Grandner Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Roland von Känel; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Joel E Dimsdale; Paul J Mills; Brent T Mausbach; Michael G Ziegler; Thomas L Patterson; Igor Grant Journal: Gerontology Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 5.140
Authors: Mark L Unruh; Susan Redline; Ming-Wen An; Daniel J Buysse; F Javier Nieto; Jeun-Liang Yeh; Anne B Newman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Yeonsu Song; Gwendolyn C Carlson; Sarah Kate McGowan; Constance H Fung; Karen R Josephson; Michael N Mitchell; Susan M McCurry; Edmond Teng; Michael R Irwin; Cathy A Alessi; Jennifer L Martin Journal: Behav Sleep Med Date: 2020-02-29 Impact factor: 2.964