| Literature DB >> 29065606 |
Anita Lyssek-Boroń1, Adam Wylęgała1, Katarzyna Polanowska1, Katarzyna Krysik1, Dariusz Dobrowolski1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate longitudinal RNFL thickness changes in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and ILM removal using OCT RTVue XR 100 Avanti.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29065606 PMCID: PMC5551530 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4673714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Characteristics of the vitrectomized eyes.
| All patients ( | Group A ( | Group B ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD, years) | 70.2 ± 7.1 | 69.6 ± 7.6 | 70.9 ± 6.7 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 19 | 12 | 7 |
| Lens status | |||
| Phakic before PPV | 20 | 11 | 9 |
| Mean BCVA | 20/40 (0.30) | 20/30 (0.20) | |
| IOP before PPV (mean ± SD) | 16.25 ± 2.83 | 14.37 ± 2.46 | |
| IOP after PPV (mean ± SD) | 17.2 ± 3.22 | 15.1 ± 4.15 | |
Group A = with glaucoma, Group B = without glaucoma, BCVA: best-corrected visual acuity; IOP: intraocular pressure.
Figure 1Patient without glaucoma. Color-coded maps of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in the four quadrants before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery (pictures from the left to the right). One month postoperation, the RNFL thickness increased at the inferior nasal and temporal quadrants because of nerve fiber edema. The increase in the RNFL thickness discontinued in the third month postintervention and decreased at 6 months and 12 months after the surgery.
RNFL thickness changes in group A and group B eyes. Group A: with glaucoma; group B: without glaucoma.
| Baseline | 1 month | 3 months | 6 months | 12 months | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total RNFL | Group A | |||||
| RNFLT | 93.0 ± 9.08 | 106.9 ± 9.29 | 95.8 ± 8.35 | 91.1 ± 8.42 | 88.7 ± 9.14 | |
| RNFL changes | 13.9 ± 8.38 | 2.8 ± 7.24 | −1.9 ± 4.89 | −4.3 ± 4.74 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Group B | ||||||
| RNFLT | 95.8 ± 5.28 | 107.0 ± 5.36 | 100.2 ± 4.48 | 94.6 ± 4.57 | 91.8 ± 5.24 | |
| RNFL changes | 11.2 ± 4.39 | 4.4 ± 3.72 | −1.2 ± 3.55 | −3.9 ± 5.80 | ||
| Superior RNFL | Group A | |||||
| RNFLT | 95.5 ± 9.34 | 111.2 ± 12.56 | 125.2 ± 12.52 | 95.8 ± 9.86 | 94.6 ± 11.83 | |
| RNFL changes | 15.7 ± 8.04 | 7.3 ± 8.45 | 0.2 ± 4.96 | −1.0 ± 5.60 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Group B | ||||||
| RNFLT | 109.4 ± 9.23 | 125.2 ± 9.83 | 115.4 ± 6.86 | 109.5 ± 6.56 | 106.8 ± 7.01 | |
| RNFL changes | 15.8 ± 10.10 | 6.0 ± 6.45 | 0.2 ± 6.16 | −2.5 ± 7.35 | ||
| Inferior RNFL | Group A | |||||
| RNFLT | 101.3 ± 14.21 | 117.1 ± 14.57 | 107.4 ± 13.16 | 98.7 ± 15.14 | 96.6 ± 14.84 | |
| RNFL changes | 15.8 ± 10.78 | 6.1 ± 12.10 | −2.6 ± 8.11 | −4.7 ± 8.26 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Group B | ||||||
| RNFLT | 111.1 ± 9.15 | 124.1 ± 8.00 | 117.1 ± 7.58 | 110.3 ± 8.03 | 108.9 ± 9.03 | |
| RNFL changes | 12.9 ± 8.02 | 6.0 ± 6.77 | −0.8 ± 3.27 | −2.2 ± 4.59 | ||
| Nasalis RNFL | Group A | |||||
| RNFLT | 81.5 ± 7.81 | 91.9 ± 7.42 | 83.4 ± 7.44 | 82.9 ± 7.681.4 ± 4.86 | 82.7 ± 8.37 | |
| RNFL changes | 10.4 ± 5.96 | 1.9 ± 5.66 | 1.2 ± 6.45 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Group B | ||||||
| RNFLT | 77.1 ± 7.94 | 85.7 ± 6.08 | 82.7 ± 5.55 | 79.8 ± 6.75 | 79.7 ± 5.58 | |
| RNFL changes | 8.6 ± 4.36 | 5.6 ± 4.37 | 2.7 ± 4.93 | 2.6 ± 6.24 | ||
| Temporalis RNFL | Group A | |||||
| RNFLT | 89.9 ± 16.49 | 105.7 ± 18.11 | 90.7 ± 14.19 | 85.8 ± 15.10 | 81.1 ± 15.29 | |
| RNFL changes | 15.8 ± 6.7 | 0.8 ± 9.90 | −4.1 ± 7.02 | −8.8 ± 7.12 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Group B | ||||||
| RNFLT | 85.8 ± 9.9 | 92.5 ± 11.22 | 85.7 ± 8.15 | 78.9 ± 7.65 | 71.9 ± 10.09 | |
| RNFL changes | 6.7 ± 4.78 | −0.1 ± 6.37 | −6.8 ± 5.15 | −13.9 ± 10.90 |
Figure 2Patient with glaucoma. Color-coded maps of the RNFL thickness in the four quadrants before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery (from the left to the right). In this patient, postoperative edema of the RNFL is followed by considerably more thinning than that shown in Figure 1.