| Literature DB >> 29065586 |
Yulia Tunakova1, Svetlana Novikova1, Aligejdar Ragimov2, Rashat Faizullin3, Vsevolod Valiev4.
Abstract
Models that describe the trace element status formation in the human organism are essential for a correction of micromineral (trace elements) deficiency. A direct trace element retention assessment in the body is difficult due to the many internal mechanisms. The trace element retention is determined by the amount and the ratio of incoming and excreted substance. So, the concentration of trace elements in drinking water characterizes the intake, whereas the element concentration in urine characterizes the excretion. This system can be interpreted as three interrelated elements that are in equilibrium. Since many relationships in the system are not known, the use of standard mathematical models is difficult. The artificial neural network use is suitable for constructing a model in the best way because it can take into account all dependencies in the system implicitly and process inaccurate and incomplete data. We created several neural network models to describe the retentions of trace elements in the human body. On the model basis, we can calculate the microelement levels in the body, knowing the trace element levels in drinking water and urine. These results can be used in health care to provide the population with safe drinking water.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29065586 PMCID: PMC5534300 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3471616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Correlation between linguistic and quantitative values of the input parameters.
| Input parameter | Trace element | Linguistic value | Centre value of the membership function |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trace elements concentration in drinking water | Zinc | Low level | 0,016 |
| High level | 0,022 | ||
| Chrome | Low level | 0,0012 | |
| High level | 0,0045 | ||
| Iron | Low level | 0,0735 | |
| High level | 0,1 | ||
| Strontium | Low level | 0,107 | |
| High level | 0,17775 | ||
| Copper | Low level | 0,0012 | |
| High level | 0,0018 | ||
| Lead | Low level | 0,012 | |
| High level | 0,0165 | ||
|
| |||
| Trace elements concentration in serum | Zinc | Low level | 0,6355 |
| High level | 0,8275 | ||
| Chrome | Low level | 0,04 | |
| High level | 0,08525 | ||
| Iron | Low level | 1,1375 | |
| High level | 1,9635 | ||
| Strontium | Low level | 0,08925 | |
| High level | 0,156 | ||
| Copper | Low level | 0,715 | |
| High level | 0,99275 | ||
| Lead | Low level | 0,0475 | |
| High level | 0,079 | ||
|
| |||
| Trace elements concentration in urine | Zinc | Low level | 0,239 |
| High level | 0,4895 | ||
| Chrome | Low level | 0,012 | |
| High level | 0,028 | ||
| Iron | Low level | 0,0745 | |
| High level | 0,2195 | ||
| Strontium | Low level | 0,087 | |
| High level | 0,222 | ||
| Copper | Low level | 0,022 | |
| High level | 0,084 | ||
| Lead | Low level | 0,028 | |
| High level | 0,055 | ||
Table of rules of inference.
| Trace elements concentration in drinking water | Trace elements concentration in serum | Trace elements concentration in urine | Retention level | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | Linguistic value | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | –0,4 | Moderately low |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | −1 | Minimal |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Equilibrium state |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | −0,6 | Low |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0,6 | High |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Equilibrium state |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Maximal |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0,4 | Moderately high |
Figure 1Structure of the model assessing the retention of trace elements.
| Weight (kg) | Height (cm) | Body surface area (m2) | Daily diuresis (ml) | Zinc concentration in drinking water (mg/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40,15 | 164 | 1,352 | 750 | 0,04 |
| Weight (kg) | Height (cm) | Body surface area (m2) | Daily diuresis (ml) | Zinc concentration in drinking water (mg/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41,8 | 170 | 1,450 | 1300 | 0,04 |
| Weight (kg) | Height (cm) | Body surface area (m2) | Daily diuresis (ml) | Zinc concentration in drinking water (mg/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | 159 | 1,587 | 720 | 0,017 |
Figure 2Results of the data processing for Table 3 using the Mamdani system.
Figure 3Results of the data processing for Table 4 using the Mamdani system.
Figure 4Results of the data processing for Table 5 using the Mamdani system.