| Literature DB >> 29065559 |
Amir Ghanei1, Faezeh Jafari2, Mojdeh Mehrinejad Khotbehsara3, Ehsan Mohseni4, Waiching Tang5, Hongzhi Cui6.
Abstract
In this study, the effects of nano-al">CuO (NC) on engineering properties of fibre-reinforced mortars incorporating metakaolin (MK) were investigated. The effects of <span class="Chemical">polypropylene fibre (PP) were also examined. A total of twenty-six mixtures were prepared. The experimental results were compared with numerical results obtained by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and Primal Estimated sub-GrAdient Solver for SVM (Pegasos) algorithm. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was also employed to investigate the microstructure of the cement matrix. The mechanical test results showed that both compressive and flexural strengths of cement mortars decreased with the increase of MK content, however the strength values increased significantly with increasing NC content in the mixture. The water absorption of samples decreased remarkably with increasing NC particles in the mixture. When PP fibres were added, the strengths of cement mortars were further enhanced accompanied with lower water absorption values. The addition of 2 wt % and 3 wt % nanoparticles in cement mortar led to a positive contribution to strength and resistance to water absorption. Mixture of PP-MK10NC3 indicated the best results for both compressive and flexural strengths at 28 and 90 days. SEM images illustrated that the morphology of cement matrix became more porous with increasing MK content, but the porosity reduced with the inclusion of NC. In addition, it is evident from the SEM images that more cement hydration products adhered onto the surface of fibres, which would improve the fibre-matrix interface. The numerical results obtained by ANFIS and Pegasos were close to the experimental results. The value of R² obtained for each data set (validate, test and train) was higher than 0.90 and the values of mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and the relative root mean squared error (PRMSE) were near zero. The ANFIS and Pegasos models can be used to predict the mechanical properties and water absorptions of fibre-reinforced mortars with MK and NC.Entities:
Keywords: ANFIS method; Pegasos algorithm; fibre-reinforced cement mortar; interfacial transition zone (ITZ); metakaolin; microstructure properties; nano-CuO
Year: 2017 PMID: 29065559 PMCID: PMC5667021 DOI: 10.3390/ma10101215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition and physical properties of binder materials.
| Chemical Analysis (%) | Cement | MK |
|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 21.75 | 52.1 |
| Al2O3 | 5.15 | 43.8 |
| Fe2O3 | 3.23 | 2.6 |
| CaO | 63.75 | 0.2 |
| MgO | 1.15 | 0.21 |
| SO3 | 1.95 | 0 |
| K2O | 0.56 | 0.32 |
| Na2O | 0.33 | 0.11 |
| L.O.I | 2.08 | 0.99 |
| Surface area (BET) (m2/g) | 0.31 | 2.54 |
| Specific gravity | 3.15 | 2.6 |
Note: The surface area was determined by gas adsorption method (BET).
Properties of nano-CuO product.
| Nanoparticles | Average Diameter (nm) | Specific Surface Area (m2/g) | Purity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| nano-CuO | 20 ± 3 | 200 | >99 |
Figure 1Nano-CuO particles of uniform distribution observed using transmission electron micrographs (TEM) (of size 50 nm).
Properties of polypropylene fibre.
| Unit weight (g/cm3) | 0.9–0.91 |
| Reaction with water | Hydrophobic |
| Tensile strength (MPa) | 300–400 |
| Elongation at break (%) | 100–600 |
| Melting point (°C) | 175 |
| Thermal conductivity (W/m/K) | 0.12 |
| Length (mm) | 6 |
| Diameter (μm) | 20 |
Mix details of mortars.
| Sample ID | Cement (kg/m3) | MK (kg/m3) | NC (kg/m3) | PP (kg/m3) | Water (kg/m3) | Sand (kg/m3) | SP (kg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 220 | 1430 | 0.9 |
| MK10 | 405 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 220 | 1415 | 1.9 |
| MK10NC1 | 400.5 | 45 | 4.5 | 0 | 220 | 1410 | 1.9 |
| MK10NC2 | 396 | 45 | 9 | 0 | 220 | 1400 | 1.9 |
| MK10NC3 | 391.5 | 45 | 13.5 | 0 | 220 | 1395 | 1.9 |
| MK20 | 360 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 220 | 1400 | 2.5 |
| MK20NC1 | 355.5 | 90 | 4.5 | 0 | 220 | 1390 | 2.5 |
| MK20NC2 | 351 | 90 | 9 | 0 | 220 | 1385 | 2.5 |
| MK20NC3 | 346.5 | 90 | 13.5 | 0 | 220 | 1380 | 2.5 |
| MK30 | 315 | 135 | 0 | 0 | 220 | 1380 | 3.5 |
| MK30NC1 | 310.5 | 135 | 4.5 | 0 | 220 | 1375 | 3.5 |
| MK30NC2 | 306 | 135 | 9 | 0 | 220 | 1370 | 3.5 |
| MK30NC3 | 301.5 | 135 | 13.5 | 0 | 220 | 1360 | 3.5 |
| PP | 450 | 0 | 0 | 1.35 | 220 | 1430 | 1.75 |
| PP-MK10 | 405 | 45 | 0 | 1.35 | 220 | 1415 | 2.75 |
| PP-MK10NC1 | 400.5 | 45 | 4.5 | 1.35 | 220 | 1410 | 2.75 |
| PP-MK10NC2 | 396 | 45 | 9 | 1.35 | 220 | 1400 | 2.75 |
| PP-MK10NC3 | 391.5 | 45 | 13.5 | 1.35 | 220 | 1395 | 2.75 |
| PP-MK20 | 360 | 90 | 0 | 1.35 | 220 | 1400 | 3.75 |
| PP-MK20NC1 | 355.5 | 90 | 4.5 | 1.35 | 220 | 1390 | 3.75 |
| PP-MK20NC2 | 351 | 90 | 9 | 1.35 | 220 | 1385 | 3.75 |
| PP-MK20NC3 | 346.5 | 90 | 13.5 | 1.35 | 220 | 1380 | 3.75 |
| PP-MK30 | 315 | 135 | 0 | 1.35 | 220 | 1380 | 4.25 |
| PP-MK30NC1 | 310.5 | 135 | 4.5 | 1.35 | 220 | 1375 | 4.25 |
| PP-MK30NC2 | 306 | 135 | 9 | 1.35 | 220 | 1370 | 4.25 |
| PP-MK30NC3 | 301.5 | 135 | 13.5 | 1.35 | 220 | 1360 | 4.25 |
Figure 2Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) structure for prediction.
Figure 3ANFIS structure for prediction.
Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and Primal Estimated sub-GrAdient Solver for SVM (Pegasos) results.
| Compressive strength | R2 | 1 | 0.90 | 0.94 |
| RRMSE | 2.96 × 10−6 | 9.48 × 10−4 | 4.8540 × 10−4 | |
| MAPE | 0.046 | 0.41 | 0.08 | |
| Flexural strength | R2 | 1 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| RRMSE | 6.98 × 10−3 | 0.016 | 0.0068 | |
| MAPE | 2.94 | 0.015 | 0.013 | |
| Water absorption | R2 | 1 | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| RRMSE | 1.18 × 10−5 | 0.0023 | 0.0025 | |
| MAPE | 0.004 | 1.27 | 1.58 | |
| Compressive strength | y = 0.99x + 0.01 | y = 0.99x + 0.23 | y = 0.96x + 1.3 | |
| Flexural strength | y = 0.99x + 0.002 | y = 1.04x − 0.37 | y = 0.99x + 0.01 | |
| Water absorption | y = 0.99x + 0.02 | y = 1.009x + 0.07 | y = 1.17x − 1.43 | |
| Compressive strength | R2 | 0.96 | 0.9 | |
| RRMSE | 2.91 × 10−4 | 0.00052 | ||
| MAPE | 1.85 | 2.47 | ||
| flexural strength | R2 | 0.99 | 0.91 | |
| RRMSE | 0.0017 | 0.005 | ||
| MAPE | 1.07 | 3.31 | ||
| Water absorption | R2 | 0.96 | 0.9 | |
| RRMSE | 2.96 × 10−6 | 2.85 × 10−3 | ||
| MAPE | 0.00305 | 1.66 | ||
| Compressive strength | y = 0.91x + 4.23 | y = 0.78x + 10.41 | ||
| Flexural strength | y = 0.97x + 0.12 | y = 0.88x + 1.03 | ||
| Water absorption | y = 0.8x + 1.58 | y = 0.92x + 0.47 | ||
Figure 4Pegasos step for solving prediction problem.
Figure 5Compressive strength results at: 28 days (top); and 90 days (below).
Figure 6SEM images of: (a) CO sample; and (b) MK30 sample.
Figure 7Percentage change in compressive strength of samples by the addition of fibres at 28 and 90 days with similar volumes of metakaolin and nano-CuO.
Figure 8SEM images of: (a) MK10 sample; and (b) MK10NC3 sample.
Figure 9Flexural strength of mortars at: 28 days (top); and 90 days (below).
Figure 10Percentage change in flexural strength of samples by the addition of fibres at 28 and 90 days with similar volumes of MK and NC.
Figure 11SEM image of: (a) PP; and (b) PP-MK10NC3.
Figure 12Water absorption of mortars at the age of 28 days.
Figure 13Percentage change in water absorption of samples by the addition of fibres at 28 days with similar volumes of MK and NC.
Figure 14Correlation between experimental and predicted results.