| Literature DB >> 29065522 |
Peng Zhang1, Xiaojian Wang2, Zhidan Lin3, Huaijun Lin4, Zhiguo Zhang5, Wei Li6, Xianfeng Yang7, Jie Cui8.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: biotribological properties; ion implantation; micro-arc oxidation; titania; titanium
Year: 2017 PMID: 29065522 PMCID: PMC5666508 DOI: 10.3390/nano7100343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a–f) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the micro-arc oxidation (MAO) specimens with different N implantation doses: Ti-MAO-N0.1, Ti-MAO-N0.5, Ti-MAO-N1.0, Ti-MAO-N5.0, Ti-MAO-N10, and Ti-MAO-N20.
Figure 2Surface morphologies of the micro-arc oxidation and nitrogen ion implantation (MAO-NII) modified specimens with different N ion implantation doses: (a) Ti-MAO-N0.1; (b) Ti-MAO-N0.5; (c) Ti-MAO-N1.0; (d) Ti-MAO-N5.0; (e) Ti-MAO-N10; and (f) Ti-MAO-N20.
Figure 3Surface images of nitrogen ion implantation MAO specimen under high magnification morphology: (a) Ti-MAO-N10 and (b) Ti-MAO-N20.
Figure 4(a) Bright field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image with selected area of the electron diffraction (SAED) pattern inset and (b) high resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of TiO/TiN film of Ti-MAO-N1.0.
Figure 5Schematic diagram of the growth mechanism of the TiO/TiN composite modification layer with a nanostitch array structure during NII.
Figure 6Friction coefficient of MAO specimens with different N doses under 50% mavericks serum lubrication conditions.
Figure 7Surface morphology of the samples after soaking in biomimetic mineralization solution for 24 days: (a) Ti-MAO-N0.1; (b) Ti-MAO-N1.0; (c) Ti-MAO-N5.0; and (d) Ti-MAO-N20.
Energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) analysis results of samples with different doses of N ion implantation after soaking in biomimetic mineralization solution for 24 days.
| Sample Name | Element Content (wt %) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ti | O | Ca | P | N | |
| Ti-MAO-N0.1 | 41.12 | 43.39 | 10.30 | 3.47 | 1.72 |
| Ti-MAO-N1.0 | 42.30 | 41.19 | 11.01 | 3.48 | 2.02 |
| Ti-MAO-N5.0 | 36.79 | 40.52 | 14.43 | 4.94 | 3.32 |
| Ti-MAO-N20 | 51.89 | 36.05 | 5.87 | 4.14 | 2.05 |
Figure 8The surface morphology of MAO specimens with different N implantation doses after cell culturing for two days: (a,b) Ti-MAO-N0.1; (c,d) Ti-MAO-N1.0; (e,f) Ti-MAO-N5.0; (g,h) Ti-MAO-N20.