Literature DB >> 29064602

Brain stimulation-induced neuroplasticity underlying therapeutic response in phantom sounds.

Timm B Poeppl1,2, Berthold Langguth1,2, Astrid Lehner1,2, Thomas Frodl3, Rainer Rupprecht1, Peter M Kreuzer1,2, Michael Landgrebe1,4, Martin Schecklmann1,2.   

Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation can modify phantom sounds for longer periods by modulating neural activity and putatively inducing regional neuroplastic changes. However, treatment response is limited and there are no good demographic or clinical predictors for treatment outcome. We used state-of-the-art voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to investigate whether transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced neuroplasticity determines therapeutic outcome. Sixty subjects chronically experiencing phantom sounds (i.e., tinnitus) received repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of left dorsolateral prefrontal and temporal cortex according to a protocol that has been shown to yield a significantly higher number of treatment responders than sham stimulation and previous stimulation protocols. Structural magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after rTMS. In VBM whole-brain analyses (P < 0.05, FWE corrected), we assessed longitudinal gray matter changes as well as structural connectivity between the ensuing regions. We observed longitudinal mesoscopic gray matter changes of left dorsolateral prefontal (DLPFC), left operculo-insular, and right inferior temporal cortex (ITC) in responders (N = 22) but not nonresponders (N = 38), as indicated by a group × time interaction and post-hoc tests. These results were neither influenced by age, sex, hearing loss nor by tinnitus laterality, duration, and severity at baseline. Furthermore, we found robust DLPFC-insula and insula-ITC connectivity in responders, while only relatively weak DLPFC-insula connectivity and no insula-ITC connectivity could be demonstrated in nonresponders. Our results reinforce the implication of nonauditory brain regions in phantom sounds and suggest the dependence of therapeutic response on their neuroplastic capabilities. The latter in turn may depend on (differences in) their individual structural connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 39:554-562, 2018.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnetic resonance imaging; phantom sounds; tinnitus; transcranial magnetic stimulation; voxel-based morphometry

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29064602      PMCID: PMC6866612          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  60 in total

1.  Lack of significant changes on magnetic resonance scans before and after 2 weeks of daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression.

Authors:  Z Nahas; C DeBrux; V Chandler; J P Lorberbaum; A M Speer; M A Molloy; C Liberatos; S C Risch; M S George
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.635

Review 2.  Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome.

Authors:  Edward T Bullmore; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 18.561

3.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Klaas E Stephan; Hartmut Mohlberg; Christian Grefkes; Gereon R Fink; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Stefan Heim; Karl Zilles; Katrin Amunts
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Tinnitus: perspectives from human neuroimaging.

Authors:  Ana Belén Elgoyhen; Berthold Langguth; Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Subcallosal brain structure: correlation with hearing threshold at supra-clinical frequencies (>8 kHz), but not with tinnitus.

Authors:  Jennifer R Melcher; Inge M Knudson; Robert A Levine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Tinnitus specifically alters the top-down executive control sub-component of attention: evidence from the Attention Network Task.

Authors:  Alexandre Heeren; Pierre Maurage; Hélène Perrot; Anne De Volder; Laurent Renier; Rodrigo Araneda; Emilie Lacroix; Monique Decat; Naima Deggouj; Pierre Philippot
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Frontostriatal Gating of Tinnitus and Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker; Elisabeth S May; Audrey Maudoux; Markus Ploner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  Neuroanatomical abnormalities in chronic tinnitus in the human brain.

Authors:  Peyman Adjamian; Deborah A Hall; Alan R Palmer; Thomas W Allan; Dave R M Langers
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Intrinsic network activity in tinnitus investigated using functional MRI.

Authors:  Amber M Leaver; Ted K Turesky; Anna Seydell-Greenwald; Susan Morgan; Hung J Kim; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sequential Prefrontal and Temporoparietal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Treatment of Tinnitus With and Without Comorbid Depression: A Case Series and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katharine G Marder; Janice Cho; Ruth Chincanchan; Andrew C Wilson; Juliana Corlier; David E Krantz; Nathaniel D Ginder; Jonathan C Lee; Scott A Wilke; Reza Tadayonnejad; Jennifer Levitt; Akira Ishiyama; Michael K Leuchter; Andrew F Leuchter
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 2.  Causal Inferences in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Research: Challenges and Perspectives.

Authors:  Justyna Hobot; Michał Klincewicz; Kristian Sandberg; Michał Wierzchoń
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Prediction of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in phantom sounds based on individual brain anatomy.

Authors:  Timm B Poeppl; Martin Schecklmann; Katrin Sakreida; Michael Landgrebe; Berthold Langguth; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-05-27

4.  Long-Term Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Tinnitus in a Guinea Pig Model.

Authors:  Farah Amat; Jack W Zimdahl; Kristin M Barry; Jennifer Rodger; Wilhelmina H A M Mulders
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.