Rok Tomazin1, Tadeja Matos2, Jacques F Meis3,4, Ferry Hagen3,4. 1. Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. 2. Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. tadeja.matos@mf.uni-lj.si. 3. Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 4. Centre of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIM: To retrospectively investigate the epidemiology of cryptococcosis in Ljubljana, Slovenia. METHODOLOGY: Forty-six sequentially obtained isolates from 19 patients were subjected to amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) genotyping, microsatellite typing, mating- and serotype PCRs and antifungal susceptibility testing. RESULTS: Majority of the isolates were Cryptococcus deneoformans (n = 29/46; 63%) followed by Cryptococcus neoformans (n = 16/46; 34.8%) and their interspecies hybrid (n = 1/46; 2.2%). Mating-type α was predominant, two mating-type a C. deneoformans isolates and one mating-type a/α isolate were observed. Several mixed infections were found by microsatellite typing; one patient had a persisting C. deneoformans infection for > 2.5 years. For C. deneoformans, the in vitro antifungal MIC90 and susceptibility ranges were for amphotericin B 0.25 µg/ml (0.031-0.25 µg/ml), 5-fluorocytosine 0.25 µg/ml (0.063-4 µg/ml), fluconazole 8 µg/ml (0.5-16 µg/ml), voriconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008-0.125 µg/ml), posaconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008-0.063 µg/ml) and itraconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.031-0.125 µg/ml). For C. neoformans, these values were for amphotericin B 0.25 µg/ml (0.063-0.5 µg/ml), 5-fluorocytosine 1 µg/ml (0.063-1 µg/ml), fluconazole 16 µg/ml (0.5-64 µg/ml), voriconazole 0.125 µg/ml (0.008-0.25 µg/ml), posaconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008-0.063 µg/ml) and itraconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.031-0.125 µg/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the cases were caused by C. deneoformans; mating-type α was predominant. Several mixed infections were identified by AFLP genotyping and microsatellite typing. Despite antifungal therapy, a cryptococcal isolate could persist for years. Voriconazole, itraconazole and posaconazole were the most potent antifungal drugs.
AIM: To retrospectively investigate the epidemiology of cryptococcosis in Ljubljana, Slovenia. METHODOLOGY: Forty-six sequentially obtained isolates from 19 patients were subjected to amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) genotyping, microsatellite typing, mating- and serotype PCRs and antifungal susceptibility testing. RESULTS: Majority of the isolates were Cryptococcus deneoformans (n = 29/46; 63%) followed by Cryptococcus neoformans (n = 16/46; 34.8%) and their interspecies hybrid (n = 1/46; 2.2%). Mating-type α was predominant, two mating-type a C. deneoformans isolates and one mating-type a/α isolate were observed. Several mixed infections were found by microsatellite typing; one patient had a persisting C. deneoformans infection for > 2.5 years. For C. deneoformans, the in vitro antifungal MIC90 and susceptibility ranges were for amphotericin B 0.25 µg/ml (0.031-0.25 µg/ml), 5-fluorocytosine 0.25 µg/ml (0.063-4 µg/ml), fluconazole 8 µg/ml (0.5-16 µg/ml), voriconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008-0.125 µg/ml), posaconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008-0.063 µg/ml) and itraconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.031-0.125 µg/ml). For C. neoformans, these values were for amphotericin B 0.25 µg/ml (0.063-0.5 µg/ml), 5-fluorocytosine 1 µg/ml (0.063-1 µg/ml), fluconazole 16 µg/ml (0.5-64 µg/ml), voriconazole 0.125 µg/ml (0.008-0.25 µg/ml), posaconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.008-0.063 µg/ml) and itraconazole 0.063 µg/ml (0.031-0.125 µg/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the cases were caused by C. deneoformans; mating-type α was predominant. Several mixed infections were identified by AFLP genotyping and microsatellite typing. Despite antifungal therapy, a cryptococcal isolate could persist for years. Voriconazole, itraconazole and posaconazole were the most potent antifungal drugs.
Authors: Kirsten Nielsen; Gary M Cox; Anastasia P Litvintseva; Eleftherios Mylonakis; Stephanie D Malliaris; Daniel K Benjamin; Steven S Giles; Thomas G Mitchell; Arturo Casadevall; John R Perfect; Joseph Heitman Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Kirsten Nielsen; Robert E Marra; Ferry Hagen; Teun Boekhout; Thomas G Mitchell; Gary M Cox; Joseph Heitman Journal: Genetics Date: 2005-06-18 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Emilija Mlinarić-Missoni; Ferry Hagen; William H M Chew; Verica Važić-Babić; Teun Boekhout; Josip Begovac Journal: J Med Microbiol Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 2.472
Authors: Fulgence K Kassi; Virginie Bellet; Adama Doumbia; Donika Krasteva; Pascal Drakulovski; Gisèle A Kouakou; François Gatchitch; Eric Delaporte; Jacques Reynes; Michèle Mallié; Hervé I E Menan; Sébastien Bertout Journal: JMM Case Rep Date: 2016-08-30
Authors: Johanna Rhodes; Mathew A Beale; Mathieu Vanhove; Joseph N Jarvis; Shichina Kannambath; John A Simpson; Anthea Ryan; Graeme Meintjes; Thomas S Harrison; Matthew C Fisher; Tihana Bicanic Journal: G3 (Bethesda) Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Maria Soledad Cuetara; Juan José Jusdado Ruiz-Capillas; Maria Pilar Nuñez-Valentin; Elena Rodríguez Garcia; Elena Garcia-Benayas; Ricardo Rojo-Amigo; Jose Carlos Rodriguez-Gallego; Ferry Hagen; María Francisca Colom Journal: Mycopathologia Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 2.574
Authors: Huilin Su; Ann Packeu; Sarah A Ahmed; Abdullah M S Al-Hatmi; Oliver Blechert; Macit İlkit; Ferry Hagen; Yvonne Gräser; Weida Liu; Shuwen Deng; Marijke Hendrickx; Jinhua Xu; Min Zhu; Sybren de Hoog Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Cullen Roth; Debra Murray; Alexandria Scott; Ci Fu; Anna F Averette; Sheng Sun; Joseph Heitman; Paul M Magwene Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 5.917