Literature DB >> 29063975

Reliability of the Parabola Approximation Method in Heart Rate Variability Analysis Using Low-Sampling-Rate Photoplethysmography.

Hyun Jae Baek1, JaeWook Shin2, Gunwoo Jin3, Jaegeol Cho4.   

Abstract

Photoplethysmographic signals are useful for heart rate variability analysis in practical ambulatory applications. While reducing the sampling rate of signals is an important consideration for modern wearable devices that enable 24/7 continuous monitoring, there have not been many studies that have investigated how to compensate the low timing resolution of low-sampling-rate signals for accurate heart rate variability analysis. In this study, we utilized the parabola approximation method and measured it against the conventional cubic spline interpolation method for the time, frequency, and nonlinear domain variables of heart rate variability. For each parameter, the intra-class correlation, standard error of measurement, Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement and root mean squared relative error were presented. Also, elapsed time taken to compute each interpolation algorithm was investigated. The results indicated that parabola approximation is a simple, fast, and accurate algorithm-based method for compensating the low timing resolution of pulse beat intervals. In addition, the method showed comparable performance with the conventional cubic spline interpolation method. Even though the absolute value of the heart rate variability variables calculated using a signal sampled at 20 Hz were not exactly matched with those calculated using a reference signal sampled at 250 Hz, the parabola approximation method remains a good interpolation method for assessing trends in HRV measurements for low-power wearable applications.

Keywords:  Heart rate variability (HRV); Low sampling rate; Parabola approximation; Photoplethysmography (PPG)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29063975     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0842-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  30 in total

1.  PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals.

Authors:  A L Goldberger; L A Amaral; L Glass; J M Hausdorff; P C Ivanov; R G Mark; J E Mietus; G B Moody; C K Peng; H E Stanley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Relationship between detrended fluctuation analysis and spectral analysis of heart-rate variability.

Authors:  Keith Willson; Darrel P Francis; Roland Wensel; Andrew J S Coats; Kim H Parker
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Smartphone-enabled pulse rate variability: an alternative methodology for the collection of heart rate variability in psychophysiological research.

Authors:  James A J Heathers
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Thermoregulation and heart rate variability.

Authors:  L A Fleisher; S M Frank; D I Sessler; C Cheng; T Matsukawa; C A Vannier
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.124

6.  Comparative study of approximate entropy and sample entropy robustness to spikes.

Authors:  Antonio Molina-Picó; David Cuesta-Frau; Mateo Aboy; Cristina Crespo; Pau Miró-Martínez; Sandra Oltra-Crespo
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 7.  Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats.

Authors:  G G Berntson; J T Bigger; D L Eckberg; P Grossman; P G Kaufmann; M Malik; H N Nagaraja; S W Porges; J P Saul; P H Stone; M W van der Molen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Influence of ECG sampling frequency on spectral analysis of RR intervals and baroreflex sensitivity using the EUROBAVAR data set.

Authors:  Tjalf Ziemssen; Julia Gasch; Heinz Ruediger
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  The relationship of autonomic imbalance, heart rate variability and cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Authors:  Julian F Thayer; Shelby S Yamamoto; Jos F Brosschot
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Computationally efficient real-time interpolation algorithm for non-uniform sampled biosignals.

Authors:  Onur Guven; Amir Eftekhar; Wilko Kindt; Timothy G Constandinou
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2016-05-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Information Retrieval from Photoplethysmographic Sensors: A Comprehensive Comparison of Practical Interpolation and Breath-Extraction Techniques at Different Sampling Rates.

Authors:  Pierluigi Reali; Riccardo Lolatto; Stefania Coelli; Gabriella Tartaglia; Anna Maria Bianchi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Effectiveness of the heartbeat interval error and compensation method on heart rate variability analysis.

Authors:  Ayaka Shintomi; Shintaro Izumi; Masahiko Yoshimoto; Hiroshi Kawaguchi
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2022-03-08

3.  Enhancing the Robustness of Smartphone Photoplethysmography: A Signal Quality Index Approach.

Authors:  Ivan Liu; Shiguang Ni; Kaiping Peng
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.