Literature DB >> 29063475

Structural Transformation Detection Contributes to Screening of Behaviorally Active Compounds: Dynamic Binding Process Analysis of DhelOBP21 from Dastarcus helophoroides.

Rui-Nan Yang1, Dong-Zhen Li1, Guangqiang Yu1,2, Shan-Cheng Yi1, Yinan Zhang3, De-Xin Kong4, Man-Qun Wang5.   

Abstract

In light of reverse chemical ecology, the fluorescence competitive binding assays of functional odorant binding proteins (OBPs) is a recent advanced approach for screening behaviorally active compounds of insects. Previous research on Dastareus helophoroides identified a minus-C OBP, DhelOBP21, which preferably binds to several ligands. In this study, only (+)-β-pinene proved attractive to unmated adult beetles. To obtain a more in-depth explanation of the lack of behavioral activity of other ligands we selected compounds with high (camphor) and low (β-caryophyllene) binding affinities. The structural transformation of OBPs was investigated using well-established approaches for studying binding processes, such as fluorescent quenching assays, circular dichroism, and molecular dynamics. The dynamic binding process revealed that the flexibility of DhelOBP21 seems conducive to binding specific ligands, as opposed to broad substrate binding. The compound (+)-β-pinene and DhelOBP21 formed a stable complex through a secondary structural transformation of DhelOBP21, in which its amino-terminus transformed from random coil to an α-helix to cover the binding pocket. On the other hand, camphor could not efficiently induce a stable structural transformation, and its high binding affinities were due to strong hydrogen-bonding, compromising the structure of the protein. The other compound, β-caryophyllene, only collided with DhelOBP21 and could not be positioned in the binding pocket. Studying structural transformation of these proteins through examining the dynamic binding process rather than using approaches that just measure binding affinities such as fluorescence competitive binding assays can provide a more efficient and reliable approach for screening behaviorally active compounds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behaviorally active compounds; Dastarcus helophoroides; Odorant binding proteins; Reverse chemical ecology; Structural transformation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29063475     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-017-0897-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  43 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 2.  A look inside odorant-binding proteins in insect chemoreception.

Authors:  Nathália F Brito; Monica F Moreira; Ana C A Melo
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.354

3.  A novel mechanism of ligand binding and release in the odorant binding protein 20 from the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Brian P Ziemba; Emma J Murphy; Hannah T Edlin; David N M Jones
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Thermodynamics of protein association reactions: forces contributing to stability.

Authors:  P D Ross; S Subramanian
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1981-05-26       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Binding of the general odorant binding protein of Bombyx mori BmorGOBP2 to the moth sex pheromone components.

Authors:  Xiaoli He; George Tzotzos; Christine Woodcock; John A Pickett; Tony Hooper; Linda M Field; Jing-Jiang Zhou
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Cooperative interactions between odorant-binding proteins of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Huili Qiao; Xiaoli He; Danuta Schymura; Liping Ban; Linda Field; Francesca Romana Dani; Elena Michelucci; Beniamino Caputo; Alessandra della Torre; Kostas Iatrou; Jing-Jiang Zhou; Jürgen Krieger; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Crystal and solution structures of an odorant-binding protein from the southern house mosquito complexed with an oviposition pheromone.

Authors:  Yang Mao; Xianzhong Xu; Wei Xu; Yuko Ishida; Walter S Leal; James B Ames; Jon Clardy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structure of a specific alcohol-binding site defined by the odorant binding protein LUSH from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Schoen W Kruse; Rui Zhao; Dean P Smith; David N M Jones
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-07-27

9.  Pheromone binding proteins enhance the sensitivity of olfactory receptors to sex pheromones in Chilo suppressalis.

Authors:  Hetan Chang; Yang Liu; Ting Yang; Paolo Pelosi; Shuanglin Dong; Guirong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Ligands for pheromone-sensing neurons are not conformationally activated odorant binding proteins.

Authors:  Carolina Gomez-Diaz; Jaime H Reina; Christian Cambillau; Richard Benton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  9 in total

1.  Three Chemosensory Proteins Involved in Chemoreception of Oedaleus asiaticus (Orthopera: Acridoidea).

Authors:  Yuan-Tao Zhou; Ling Li; Xiao-Rong Zhou; Yao Tan; Bao-Ping Pang
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  A chemosensory protein MsepCSP5 involved in chemoreception of oriental armyworm Mythimna separata.

Authors:  Aneela Younas; Muhammad Irfan Waris; Xiang-Qian Chang; Muhammad Shaaban; Hazem Abdelnabby; Muhammad Tahir Ul Qamar; Man-Qun Wang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 3.  Odorant Receptors and Odorant-Binding Proteins as Insect Pest Control Targets: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Herbert Venthur; Jing-Jiang Zhou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Functional Analysis of the Chemosensory Protein MsepCSP8 From the Oriental Armyworm Mythimna separata.

Authors:  Aneela Younas; Muhammad I Waris; Muhammad Tahir Ul Qamar; Muhammad Shaaban; Sean M Prager; Man-Qun Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Functional Analysis of Two Odorant-Binding Proteins, MaltOBP9 and MaltOBP10, in Monochamus alternatus Hope.

Authors:  Dong-Zhen Li; Xiao-Feng Huang; Rui-Nan Yang; Jing-Yuan Chen; Man-Qun Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Identification and Functional Analysis of SlitOBP11 From Spodoptera litura.

Authors:  Jiaojiao Luo; Zan Zhang; Dongzhen Li; Jie Liu; Kun Li; Xiao Sun; Lin He
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  A Salivary Odorant-Binding Protein Mediates Nilaparvata lugens Feeding and Host Plant Phytohormone Suppression.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Chao Wang; Chang-Lai Qiu; Jin-Hua Shi; Ze Sun; Xin-Jun Hu; Le Liu; Man-Qun Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Deciphering the Odorant Binding, Activation, and Discrimination Mechanism of Dhelobp21 from Dastarus Helophoroides.

Authors:  Guang-Qiang Yu; Dong-Zhen Li; Yu-Lin Lu; Ya-Qi Wang; De-Xin Kong; Man-Qun Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  An Odorant Binding Protein (SaveOBP9) Involved in Chemoreception of the Wheat Aphid Sitobion avenae.

Authors:  Rana Muhammad Kaleem Ullah; Sundas Rana Quershi; Muhammad Muzammal Adeel; Hazem Abdelnabby; Muhammad Irfan Waris; Shuang-Gang Duan; Man-Qun Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.