| Literature DB >> 29063407 |
Dorota Kasowska1, Krzysztof Gediga2, Zofia Spiak2.
Abstract
Copper ore mining and processing release hazardous post-flotation wastes that are difficult for remediation. The studied tailings were extremely rich in Cu (1800 mg kg-1) and contaminated with Co and Mn, and contained very little available forms of P, Fe, and Zn. The plants growing in tailings were distinctly enriched in Cu, Cd, Co, Ni, and Pb, and the concentration of copper achived the critical toxicity level in shoots of Cerastium arvense and Polygonum aviculare. The redundancy analysis demonstrated significant relationship between the concentration of available forms of studied elements in substrate and the chemical composition of plant shoots. Results of the principal component analysis enabled to distinguish groups of plants which significantly differed in the pattern of element accumulation. The grass species Agrostis stolonifera and Calamagrostis epigejos growing in the tailings accumulated significantly lower amounts of Cu, but they also had the lowest levels of P, Fe, and Zn in comparison to dicotyledonous. A. stolonifera occurred to be the most suitable species for phytostabilization of the tailings with regard to its low shoot Cu content and more efficient acquisition of limiting nutrients in relation to C. epigejos. The amendments improving texture, phosphorus fertilization, and the introduction of native leguminous species were recommended for application in the phytoremediation process of the tailings.Entities:
Keywords: Copper mining; Element accumulation; Metal pollution; Phytoremediation; Tailings
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29063407 PMCID: PMC5756550 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0451-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Location of the study sites and the view of “Wartowice 3” tailings pond with extremely poor vegetation
Granulometric composition of the copper mine post-flotation tailings
| Granulometric fraction | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grain size (mm) | > 2.0 | 0.05–2.0 | 0.002–0.05 | < 0.002 |
| Share (%) | 0 | 1–13 | 63–85 | 5–35 |
Total element content (mg kg−1) in the copper mine post-flotation tailings
| Ca | Cd | Co | Cu | Fe | K | Mg | Mn | Na | Ni | P | Pb | Zn | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 163,000 | 0.4 | 20.0 | 1800 | 18,000 | 27,000 | 24,000 | 1900 | 800 | 22.6 | 800 | 36.8 | 65.9 |
| SD | 5000 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 90 | 800 | 1000 | 1000 | 90 | 30 | 2.1 | 50 | 4.9 | 8.7 |
Concentration of the available formsa of elements (mg kg−1) in the copper mine post-flotation tailings and the reference soil
| Cu tailings | Reference soil | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Median | Mean ± SD | Median |
| |
| Ca | 37,605 ± 1608 | 37,475 | 5129 ± 1620 | 4713 | < 0.0001 |
| Co | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 2.0 | 0.8 ± 0.6 | 1.0 | < 0.0002 |
| Cu | 745 ± 265 | 686 | 16 ± 13 | 10 | < 0.0001 |
| Fe | 151 ± 11 | 155 | 94 ± 47 | 72 | < 0.003 |
| K | 237 ± 55 | 239 | 133 ± 80 | 105 | < 0.002 |
| Mg | 377 ± 57 | 355 | 112 ± 24 | 108 | < 0.0001 |
| Mn | 318 ± 13 | 320 | 48 ± 8 | 48 | < 0.0001 |
| P | 31 ± 11 | 30 | 712 ± 362 | 641 | < 0.0001 |
| Zn | 2.2 ± 0.9 | 2.0 | 17 ± 11 | 15 | < 0.0001 |
The results are presented as mean with standard deviation (SD) and median; t test probability level (P) for comparison of means of both substrates, significant differences in bold text
aDetermined according to the Yanai et al. 2000
Element content (mg kg−1) in plant shoots from the copper mine post-flotation tailings and the reference soil
| Study site |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 6840 ± 1457 7100 | 7600 ± 2700 6150 | 29000 ± 2800 28900 | 19100 ± 1700 19400 | 21000 ± 1900 20100 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 4030 ± 651 4000 | 4100 ± 960 4500 | 3800 ± 1200 3888 | 6500 ± 1300 7100 | 21500 ± 1900 21600 | |
|
|
| > 0.05 |
|
| > 0.05 | ||
| Cd | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 0.36 ± 0.10 0.41 | 0.80 ± 0.10 0.81 | 0.72 ± 0.05 0.70 | 0.61 ± 0.13 0.60 | 0.28 ± 0.03 0.26 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 0.34 ± 0.06 0.32 | 0.30 ± 0.03 0.30 | 0.52 ± 0.66 0.24 | 0.33 ± 0.03 0.33 | 0.33 ± 0.03 0.34 | |
|
| > 0.05 | < | > 0.05 | < | > 0.05 | ||
| Co | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 1.50 ± 0.30 1.62 | 1.19 ± 0.30 1.13 | 3.90 ± 0.50 3.98 | 2.70 ± 0.20 2.71 | 3.10 ± 0.20 3.06 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 1.30 ± 0.20 1.40 | 0.97 ± 0.10 0.97 | 0.93 ± 0.10 0.92 | 1.40 ± 0.10 1.41 | 2.70 ± 0.10 2.67 | |
|
| > 0.05 | > 0.05 |
|
| > 0.05 | ||
| Cu | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 10.40 ± 1.40 10.70 | 6.00 ± 1.90 6.08 | 47.00 ± 8.50 43.80 | 37.80 ± 5.50 39.00 | 16.70 ± 4.80 11.80 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 4.60 ± 1.30 4.80 | 2.70 ± 0.80 2.86 | 5.70 ± 1.10 5.83 | 3.80 ± 0.10 3.78 | 5.40 ± 1.70 4.60 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Fe | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 38.30 ± 5.30 40.00 | 30.67 ± 5.20 31.00 | 95.10 ± 25.40 82.00 | 68.10 ± 17.20 69.00 | 54.40 ± 13.50 47.00 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 103.10 ± 27.80 114.00 | 57.54 ± 8.80 53.30 | 125.90 ± 54.30 114.00 | 370.00 ± 94.00 407.00 | 92.90 ± 17.30 102.00 | |
|
|
|
| > 0.05 |
|
| ||
| K | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 16000 ± 1420 15600 | 12000 ± 1200 12000 | 36800 ± 9900 33100 | 18900 ± 2800 18250 | 39600 ± 2400 38900 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 25000 ± 6450 23400 | 15600 ± 2900 15400 | 25100 ± 7000 23375 | 7800 ± 1200 9820 | 28100 ± 1000 27900 | |
|
|
| > 0.05 |
|
|
| ||
| Mg | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 1560 ± 40 1600 | 1350 ± 170 1400 | 7300 ± 1400 6800 | 7800 ± 1500 7550 | 5000 ± 1700 5300 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 1300 ± 30 1300 | 830 ± 150 800 | 2400 ± 700 2510 | 930 ± 60 900 | 2600 ± 900 2500 | |
|
| > 0.05 |
|
|
| > 0.05 | ||
| Mn | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 47.40 ± 10.30 52.00 | 118.60 ± 34.90 136.00 | 126.60 ± 30.00 129.00 | 128.80 ± 24.60 117.00 | 22.20 ± 6.30 21.00 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 55.70 ± 4.90 57.00 | 35.70 ± 13.70 35.00 | 84.30 ± 55.30 55.00 | 45.00 ± 11.60 39.00 | 41.60 ± 3.20 42.00 | |
|
| > 0.05 |
| > 0.05 |
| > 0.05 | ||
| Na | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 23.40 ± 2.60 22.80 | 16.20 ± 2.50 15.70 | 58.90 ± 18.40 55.00 | 78.70 ± 18.10 82.00 | 42.90 ± 12.00 39.00 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 4.90 ± 1.20 5.30 | 14.80 ± 1.70 15.40 | 21.30 ± 9.30 22.00 | 4.60 ± 0.10 4.65 | 38.90 ± 6.60 39.00 | |
|
|
| > 0.05 |
|
| > 0.05 | ||
| Ni | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 4.97 ± 1.63 4.28 | 5.40 ± 0.80 5.30 | 5.05 ± 0.58 4.90 | 4.96 ± 1.07 4.77 | 3.02 ± 0.57 3.40 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 3.41 ± 0.35 3.30 | 2.20 ± 0.20 2.20 | 0.63 ± 0.35 0.60 | 3.05 ± 0.09 3.09 | 3.05 ± 0.09 4.10 | |
|
| > 0.05 | < | < | < | > 0.05 | ||
| P | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 1160 ± 30 1100 | 950 ± 200 850 | 2200 ± 400 2100 | 2200 ± 200 2150 | 1830 ± 150 1800 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 3430 ± 110 3300 | 2500 ± 300 2500 | 2700 ± 1100 2885 | 2200 ± 200 2300 | 1830 ± 290 2000 | |
|
|
|
| > 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | ||
| Pb | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 5.71 ± 1.54 6.40 | 11.60 ± 1.10 11.40 | 8.79 ± 2.40 7.72 | 8.12 ± 1.89 7.60 | 3.65 ± 0.39 3.50 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 4.18 ± 0.62 3.85 | 3.60 ± 0.30 3.55 | 3.46 ± 0.22 3.44 | 5.02 ± 0.08 5.00 | 6.35 ± 0.43 6.40 | |
|
| > 0.05 | < | < | < | < | ||
| Zn | Cu tailings | Mean ± SD Median | 28.80 ± 8.30 28.80 | 17.10 ± 4.60 15.10 | 35.80 ± 8.70 37.00 | 39.40 ± 7.70 36.00 | 20.50 ± 3.5020.00 |
| Reference soil | Mean ± SD Median | 25.70 ± 11.20 21.70 | 23.70 ± 9.80 23.10 | 61.40 ± 11.0 59.00 | 34.30 ± 2.20 33.00 | 31.80 ± 4.90 29.00 | |
|
| > 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 |
|
The results are presented as values of mean ± standard deviation (SD) and Median, t test probability level (P) for comparison of means of both study sites, significant differences are italicized
Fig. 2Principal component analysis (PCA) ordination plot based on the accumulation of P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn in shoots of plants from the copper post-flotation tailings and the reference soil, with groups of species that differ in the element contents. The variables with no significant effect (<0.5 correlation coefficient with axes) are not presented. Agrst—Agrostis stolonifera, Calep—Calamagrostis epigejos, Cerar— Cerastium arvense, Polav—Polygonum aviculare, Tusfa—Tussilago farfara; filled circle—copper tailings, open triangle—reference soil
Fig. 3Redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination plot—the effect of Fe, Ca, Co, Cu, K, Mg, Mn, P, and Zn concentration in the copper tailings and the reference soil on the content of some elements in plants (according to PCA). The less significant variables (< 0.5 correlation coefficient with axes) are not presented. Black and red vectors indicate the explanatory and the response variables, respectively