Chae Jung Park1, Chansik An1, Sumi Park2, Jin-Young Choi1, Myeong-Jin Kim3. 1. Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. kimnex@yuhs.ac.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the significance of subcentimetre (≤1 cm) arterially enhancing and hepatobiliary hypointense lesions (SAELs) observed on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A SAEL was defined as a subcentimetre hypervascular nodule exhibiting a hepatobiliary phase defect on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. We included 52 SAELs from 46 patients in a HCC surveillance population. The HCC reference standard was pathologic confirmation or a nodule >1 cm with typical imaging features of HCC at follow-up imaging. The malignancy rate and HCC-favourable imaging findings of SAELs were evaluated. RESULTS: The malignancy rate among SAELs was 57.7% (30/52). At diagnosis, all SAELs that progressed to overt HCC were treatable with curative intention. Venous or late dynamic phase washout was more frequently observed with malignant SAELs than with benign SAELs (57.7% vs. 30.6%; P = 0.01). If SAELs exhibiting washout were considered as HCC, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value was 83.3%, 50%, and 69.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among patients at risk of HCC, SAELs on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI exhibited high malignant potential. However, close observation may be an appropriate strategy for isolated SAELs. A washout appearance may be helpful for predicting malignancy. KEY POINTS: • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI provides hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. • Screening frequently detects subcentimetre arterially enhancing and hepatobiliary hypointense lesions (SAELs). • A majority of SAELs progressed to overt HCC within 2 years. • A venous-phase washout appearance correlated significantly with malignancy in SAELs.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the significance of subcentimetre (≤1 cm) arterially enhancing and hepatobiliary hypointense lesions (SAELs) observed on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A SAEL was defined as a subcentimetre hypervascular nodule exhibiting a hepatobiliary phase defect on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. We included 52 SAELs from 46 patients in a HCC surveillance population. The HCC reference standard was pathologic confirmation or a nodule >1 cm with typical imaging features of HCC at follow-up imaging. The malignancy rate and HCC-favourable imaging findings of SAELs were evaluated. RESULTS: The malignancy rate among SAELs was 57.7% (30/52). At diagnosis, all SAELs that progressed to overt HCC were treatable with curative intention. Venous or late dynamic phase washout was more frequently observed with malignant SAELs than with benign SAELs (57.7% vs. 30.6%; P = 0.01). If SAELs exhibiting washout were considered as HCC, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value was 83.3%, 50%, and 69.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among patients at risk of HCC, SAELs on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI exhibited high malignant potential. However, close observation may be an appropriate strategy for isolated SAELs. A washout appearance may be helpful for predicting malignancy. KEY POINTS: • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI provides hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. • Screening frequently detects subcentimetre arterially enhancing and hepatobiliary hypointense lesions (SAELs). • A majority of SAELs progressed to overt HCC within 2 years. • A venous-phase washout appearance correlated significantly with malignancy in SAELs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnosis; Gadoxetic acid; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sensitivity and specificity
Authors: Mustafa R Bashir; Rajan T Gupta; Matthew S Davenport; Brian C Allen; Tracy A Jaffe; Lisa M Ho; Daniel T Boll; Elmar M Merkle Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Yoon Jin Lee; Jeong Min Lee; Ji Sung Lee; Hwa Young Lee; Bo Hyun Park; Young Hoon Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Panita Mettikanont; Anita Kalluri; Therese Bittermann; Neil Phillips; Bao-Li Loza; Mark Rosen; Evan Siegelman; Emma Furth; Peter Abt; Kim Olthoff; Abraham Shaked; Maarouf Hoteit; K Rajender Reddy Journal: J Clin Exp Hepatol Date: 2022-03-09