Literature DB >> 29063219

Treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome due to rectocele and rectal intussusception with a high volume stapler (TST STARR-plus).

G Naldini1, B Fabiani1, C Menconi1, I Giani1, G Toniolo1, D Mascagni2, J Martellucci3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, stapled transanal resection (STARR) has been adopted worldwide with convincing short-term results. However, due to the high recurrence rate and some major complications after STARR, there is still controversy about when the procedure is indicated. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy and feasibility of STARR performed with a new dedicated device for tailored transanal stapled surgery.
METHODS: All the consecutive patients affected by obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) due to rectocele or/and rectal intussusception, who underwent STARR with the TST STARR-Plus stapler, were included in a prospective study. Pain, Cleveland Clinic Score for Constipation (CCCS) and incontinence, patient satisfaction, number of hemostatic stitches, operative time, hospital stay and perioperative complications were recorded. Postoperative complications and recurrence were also reported.
RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive patients (median age 50; range 24-79) were included in the study. Median resected volume was 15 cm3 (range 12-19 cm3) with a median height of surgical specimen of 5.6 cm (range 4.5-10 cm). The mean CCCS decreased from 17.26 (± 3.77) to 5.42 (± 2.78) postoperatively (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction grade was excellent in 14 patients (31.1%), good in 25 (55.5%), sufficient in three (6.7%) and poor in three patients (6.7%). No major complications occurred. Five patients (11%) reported urgency after 30 days and two patients (4%) after 12 months. The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence score did not significantly change. At a median follow-up of 23 months (range 12-30 months), only three patients (6.7%) reported recurrent symptoms of obstructed defecation comparable to those reported at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: TST STARR-Plus seems to be safe and effective for the treatment of ODS due to rectocele and rectal intussusception, and technical improvement could reduce the risk of some complications. However, careful patient selection is still the best means of preventing complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obstructed defecation; Rectal prolapse; Rectal resection; Rectocele intussusception; STARR; Surgical stapling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29063219     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1696-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  23 in total

1.  Stapled transanal rectal resection to treat obstructed defecation caused by rectal intussusception and rectocele.

Authors:  A Renzi; D Izzo; G Di Sarno; G Izzo; N Di Martino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Stapled transanal rectal resection under laparoscopic surveillance for rectocele and concomitant enterocele.

Authors:  S Petersen; G Hellmich; A Schuster; D Lehmann; W Albert; K Ludwig
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Serious unconventional complications of surgery with stapler for haemorrhoidal prolapse and obstructed defaecation because of rectocoele and rectal intussusception.

Authors:  G Naldini
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Quo vadis STARR? A prospective long-term follow-up of stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome.

Authors:  Oliver Zehler; Yogesh K Vashist; Dean Bogoevski; Maximillian Bockhorn; Emre F Yekebas; Jakob R Izbicki; Asad Kutup
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  In patients with rectoceles and obstructed defecation syndrome, surgery should be the option of last resort.

Authors:  Caitlin W Hicks; Milena Weinstein; May Wakamatsu; Lieba Savitt; Samantha Pulliam; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Predictive factors for postoperative constipation and continence after stapled transanal rectal resection.

Authors:  L Boenicke; J Reibetanz; M Kim; N Schlegel; C-T Germer; C Isbert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features.

Authors:  W F Stewart; J N Liberman; R S Sandler; M S Woods; A Stemhagen; E Chee; R B Lipton; C E Farup
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gagliardi; Mario Pescatori; Donato F Altomare; Gian Andrea Binda; Corrado Bottini; Giuseppe Dodi; Vincenzino Filingeri; Giovanni Milito; Marcella Rinaldi; Giovanni Romano; Liana Spazzafumo; Mario Trompetto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR Registry.

Authors:  D G Jayne; O Schwandner; A Stuto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Prospective multicentre clinical trial of stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructive defaecation syndrome.

Authors:  A Arroyo; F X González-Argenté; M García-Domingo; E Espin-Basany; F De-la-Portilla; F Pérez-Vicente; R Calpena
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  Management of retrorectal hematoma after stapled transanal rectal resection for prolapsed hemorrhoids associated with occult rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation syndrome.

Authors:  N Antonacci; G Taffurelli
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Staplers for obstructed defecation syndrome.

Authors:  F S P Regadas; F S P Regadas Filho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Impact of TRREMS on symptoms of obstructed defecation due to rectocele: predictive factors and outcomes.

Authors:  F S P Regadas; S M Murad-Regadas; L V Rodrigues; F S P Regadas Filho; A S Vilarinho; D P Morano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Clinical efficacy of integral theory-guided laparoscopic integral pelvic floor/ligament repair in the treatment of internal rectal prolapse in females.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Yong-Li Cao; Yuan-Yao Zhang; Shou-Sen Shi; Wei-Wei Yang; Nan Zhao; Bing-Bing Lyu; Wen-Li Zhang; Dong Wei
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (Starr) in the Treatment of Obstructed Defecation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ripamonti; Angelo Guttadauro; Giulia Lo Bianco; Maria Rennis; Matteo Maternini; Gerardo Cioffi; Marco Chiarelli; Matilde De Simone; Ugo Cioffi; Francesco Gabrielli
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.