Literature DB >> 29063065

Paradoxical embolism: Experiences from a single center.

Hong-Liang Zhang1, Zhi-Hong Liu1, Qin Luo1, Yong Wang1, Zhi-Hui Zhao1, Chang-Ming Xiong1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present our treatment experiences and the follow-up data of patients with paradoxical embolism (PDE).
METHODS: The clinical characteristics, management, and follow-up data of all included patients who were diagnosed with PDE at Fuwai Hospital from January 1994 to October 2015 were recorded.
RESULTS: Twelve patients were included; all had a pulmonary embolism, and 8 had deep venous thrombosis. The artery embolisms involved the cerebral artery (7 patients), renal artery (2 patients), mesentery artery (2 patients), popliteal artery (1 patient), descending aorta thrombus (1 patient), and thrombus-straddled patent foramen ovale (PFO) (1 patient). PFO was found in 3 cases. One patient underwent thrombectomy and PFO closure; Six patients received thrombolysis; and 3 patients were implanted with a vena cava filter. Long-term anticoagulation with warfarin was recommended for each patient. One patient died from ventricular fibrillation despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Eleven patients were discharged with improvements. No late mortality occurred in 8 patients with a complete follow-up of 10.6-17.7 years. One had a recurrent deep venous thrombosis. No patient had a recurrent pulmonary or arterial embolism. Two patients changed their treatment from warfarin to aspirin; others remained on warfarin. Only 1 case had an occasional gum bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: PDE treatment including thrombolysis, anticoagulation, and embolectomy should be individualized. We recommend long-term anticoagulation therapy to prevent the recurrence of PDE, especially to those with an intracardiac communication or persistent risk factors for re-thrombosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep venous thrombosis; Paradoxical embolism; Patent foramen ovale; Pulmonary embolism

Year:  2017        PMID: 29063065      PMCID: PMC5627697          DOI: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2017.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronic Dis Transl Med        ISSN: 2095-882X


Introduction

Paradoxical embolism (PDE) refers to the blockage of an artery due to a passage of a clot from a systemic vein to a systemic artery without passing through the lungs, which ordinarily acts as a filter to remove blood clots from entering the arterial circulation. PDE occurs when there is a defect that allows a clot to cross directly from the right to the left side of the heart, as in patients with atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale (PFO). Once in the arterial circulation, a clot can travel to any site where it can block an artery. PDE is frequently associated with cryptogenic stroke, peripheral embolism, and brain abscess. Cardiac sources account for 80% of all peripheral arterial thromboembolic events. PDE is comparatively rare and is recognized for less than 2% of systemic arterial emboli. However, the importance of PDE might be underestimated. Clinically, we often encounter patients with acute arterial embolisms with no identifiable significant atherosclerotic risk factors and can not find the sources of thrombus despite a thorough examination. Meacham et al reported that PDE could account for as many as 47,000 unexplained ischemic strokes each year in the United States. Our study aims to present the treatment experiences and follow-up data of our 12 cases with PDE, review and compare with prior reports, and enhance the recognition for PDE as a potential cause of arterial embolism.

Materials and methods

All patients who were diagnosed with PDE at Fuwai Hospital from January 1994 to October 2015 were included. All data related to the patients with PDE were collected, such as (1) demographic data; (2) case history and risk factors for thromboembolism; (3) clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and systemic arterial embolic events; (4) imaging findings of an abnormal communication that allowed a right-to-left shunt; (5) treatment and outcome; and (6) follow-up data. Follow-up data were obtained from hospital records or by telephone interviews with the patients or their family members. The follow-up period ended on November 1, 2015.

Results

Twelve patients were diagnosed with PDE during the past 21.8 years. The patients included 7 men and 5 women, with a median age of 53 years (range, 27–75 years) and a median body mass index (BMI) of 23.6 kg/m2 (range, 18.9–27.1 kg/m2). Eleven patients had 1 or more risk factors for thrombosis. Two patients had invasive tests through their femoral blood vessels, which may have directly led to thrombosis. No recognized risk factors were found in 1 patient. None of the patients had an identifiable coagulation defect (see Table 1 for more information).
Table 1

Clinical data and follow-up results of the patients with paradoxical embolism.

CaseGenderAge, yearsBMI, kg/m2Risk factors for thrombosisInducing or exacerbating factorsSymptomsDVTPESystemic arterial embolismTreatmentOutcomeFollow-up, years
1M59CAG through femoral artery, hypertension, smokingDefecationSyncopeRightYesRight CVA; mesentery arteryCPRDied
2M5623.6radiofrequency ablation through femoral artery and vein, smokingDefecationSyncopeBilateralYesRight renal arteryCPR, warfarinNANA
3M3423.7SmokingDyspnea, hemoptysisLeftYesThrombus-straddled PFOThrombectomy, IVCF, warfarinAlive17.7
4M5522.9History of L lower limb bruising, hypertensionSitting still for 2 hDyspnea, abdominal and lower back painLeftYesRight renal artery mesentery arteryUrokinase, warfarin, IVCFNANA
5F7523.8Venous varices in Bilateral lower limbs, hypertension, smokingDefecationDyspnea, palpitation, CVALeftYesLeft CVAUrokinase, warfarinNANA
6M5118.9Long-term standing work, smokingDefecationDyspnea, convulsionYesBilateral CVAUrokinase, warfarinAlive13.7
7F2721.0PeripartumDeliveryDyspnea, palpitation, pain in B lower limb, CVABilateralYesRight CVAUrokinase, warfarin, IVCFAlive13.5
8M3924.8Dyspnea, pain in Left lower limbRightYesLilateral popliteal arteryrt-PA, warfarinAlive12.6
9M5822.6Sedentary lifestyle, hypercholesterolemiaDriving for 4 hDyspneaLeftYesDescending aorta thrombusrt-PA, warfarinAlive11.9
10F4126.7OverweightDyspnea, CVAYesLeft CVAWarfarinAlive10.9
11F5821.8Venous varices in the Left lower limbDefecationDyspnea, cough, CVAYesLeft CVAWarfarinAlive10.8
12F4227.1OverweightDyspnea, CVAYesRight CVAWarfarin, pulmonary endarterectomyAlive10.6

BMI: body mass index; CAG: coronary angiogram; CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; DVT: deep venous thrombosis; F: female; IVCF: inferior vena cava filter; M: male; NA: not available; PE: pulmonary embolism; rt-PA: recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.

The BMI of case 1 was unavailable.

Clinical data and follow-up results of the patients with paradoxical embolism. BMI: body mass index; CAG: coronary angiogram; CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CVA: cerebrovascular accident; DVT: deep venous thrombosis; F: female; IVCF: inferior vena cava filter; M: male; NA: not available; PE: pulmonary embolism; rt-PA: recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. The BMI of case 1 was unavailable. All patients had a PE. Compressed ultrasonography of the lower limbs showed that 8 patients had a DVT, 3 had abnormally slow blood flow (cases 6, 11, and 12), and 1 had no abnormal findings (case 10). The arterial embolisms included 7 cerebrovascular events, 2 renal artery embolisms, 2 mesentery artery embolisms, and 1 each of popliteal artery embolism, descending aorta thrombus (Fig. 1), and thrombus-straddled PFO. Echocardiography showed no thrombus arising from the left heart. The disease onset was progressive in 4 patients and suddenly initiated or exacerbated in the other 8 patients: 5 related to defecation, 2 to immobility for several hours, and 1 to delivery of an infant. All symptoms were mainly related to PE/DVT and associated with arterial embolisms.
Fig. 1

Computed tomography of the chest in case 9 before thrombolysis. The major pulmonary artery is enlarged. The distal right pulmonary artery is partly occluded; the left upper lobular artery is nearly totally occluded; and there is a thrombus floating in the lumen of the descending aorta. The arrows point to the thrombus.

Computed tomography of the chest in case 9 before thrombolysis. The major pulmonary artery is enlarged. The distal right pulmonary artery is partly occluded; the left upper lobular artery is nearly totally occluded; and there is a thrombus floating in the lumen of the descending aorta. The arrows point to the thrombus. Six patients received thrombolytic therapy, 4 with urokinase and 2 with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA); all received anticoagulants, heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by warfarin with a targeted international normalized ratio (INR) 2.0–3.0. Three received an implanted inferior vena cava filter (IVCF); 2 underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and 1 died of ventricular fibrillation (case 1). PFO was found in 3 patients (cases 3, 9, and 11). Case 3 had an emergency thrombectomy for a thrombus-straddled PFO with a concurrent PFO repair. The other 2 cases with PFOs were not repaired. Case 12 underwent a pulmonary endarterectomy after anticoagulation for 6 months. Eleven patients were discharged with improvements. The descending aorta thrombus in case 9 disappeared after anticoagulation (Fig. 2). All the patients were recommended long-term anticoagulation with warfarin and monthly monitoring of INR.
Fig. 2

Computed tomography of the chest in case 9 after thrombolysis before discharge. The major pulmonary artery is enlarged. The walls of the right pulmonary artery and left upper lobular artery are irregular and thick. The thrombus in the distal right pulmonary artery is partly resolved, and the left upper lobular artery is partly recanalized. The thrombus floating in the lumen of the descending aorta disappeared. The arrows point to the thrombus.

Computed tomography of the chest in case 9 after thrombolysis before discharge. The major pulmonary artery is enlarged. The walls of the right pulmonary artery and left upper lobular artery are irregular and thick. The thrombus in the distal right pulmonary artery is partly resolved, and the left upper lobular artery is partly recanalized. The thrombus floating in the lumen of the descending aorta disappeared. The arrows point to the thrombus. Contact was lost after discharge in 4 patients; the other 8 patients had a complete follow-up (median period, 12.3 years; range, 10.6–17.7 years). They are all still on medication and perform their daily activities well. Six patients are on warfarin with an INR of 2.0–3.0. Cases 9 and 11 changed their treatment from warfarin to aspirin with a daily dose of 100 mg at 6 and 35 months after discharge for fear of bleeding and being tired of INR monitoring. Thrombi were residual in the lower limb in cases 3 and 8 and in the pulmonary artery in cases 9 and 10. None demonstrated recurrent symptoms or signs of either pulmonary or arterial emboli; however, case 7 had a recurrent DVT, and case 10 had occasional episodes of dizziness without evidence of stroke. No patient had bleeding complications secondary to anticoagulation, except for case 11, which had an occasional gum bleeding. See Table 1 for more information.

Discussion

Pathophysiology

According to Johnson, the diagnosis of PDE should be considered in the presence of (1) a systemic arterial embolus that did not arise from the left side of the heart, (2) venous thrombosis and /or PE, or (3) an intracardiac communication that permitted a right-to-left shunt. The diagnosis of PDE was termed definitive when made at autopsy or when a thrombus is seen crossing an intracardiac defect during echocardiography of an arterial embolus4, 6 and considered presumptive if the 3 criteria were fulfilled. The clinical diagnosis of PDE requires at least 2 of the 3 criteria. Following these diagnostic standards, only case 3 had a definitive PDE; cases 9 and 11 had a presumptive PDE; and others had a clinical PDE. However, based on the patients' histories and courses of the disease, the diagnosis of PDE was strongly suggested in all the 12 patients.

Incidence

PDE can occur only when there is an abnormal vascular or intracardiac defect. The most common defect associated with PDE was PFO. The closure of the foramen ovale is normally complete before the age of 2 years. If the foramen ovale was incompletely closed, it could be normally kept sealed by a pressure gradient between the left and right atrium but might be opened when the right atrial pressure increases and exceeds the left atrial pressure. Thus, the foramen ovale serves as a potential route for emboli arising from the right side of the heart. The incidence of PFO was 20.8% in the general population. In a study of 180 patients with PDE, 125 (69.4%) patients had a PFO, 63 (35%) had an atrial septal aneurysm, 24 (13.3%) had a PFO-like septal defect, and 31 (17.2%) had an atrial septal defect. In our case series, PFO was found in 3 (25%) patients via transthoracic echocardiography; no other abnormal vascular or intracardiac defects were found. However, the rate of PFO in our cases might be underestimated for the following reasons: (1) A Valsalva maneuver was not performed when the patients were receiving transthoracic echocardiography; and (2) none of our patients received a transesophageal echocardiogram, which could easily have revealed a right-to-left shunt at the atrial level, with a sensitivity and specificity level as high as 95%. In 6 patients, the onset of arterial embolism was definitely related to defecation or delivery, which could transiently open the foramen ovale. We believed that they all had a PFO. Sandler and Martin reported that 79% of patients with PE had an evidence of DVT; if DVT was not detected, the entire thrombus may have already detached and embolized. In our patients with DVT, the source of thrombus was definitely identified from the lower limb in 8 (67%) patients. In cases 6, 11, and 12, the thrombus might have also arisen from the lower limb because the ultrasonography showed that the deep veins of their lower limbs were abnormal. The source of thrombus in case 10 was unknown because he had no identified risk factors for thrombosis and normal compressed ultrasonography results in the lower limb deep veins.

Distribution of arterial targets

The distribution of arterial emboli in PDE has differed among studies. According to D'Audiffret et al, the extremity arteries (55%) and cerebral arteries (37–50%) represented the most frequent targets; the visceral and coronary arteries were rarer targets (6–9% and 7–9%, respectively). Dubiel et al found the cerebrum as the most targeted (89.4%) area, with 57.8% cases of cerebral embolism and 31.7% cases of transient ischemic attacks; others were coronary (8.9%) and peripheral (1.7%) embolisms. In our case series, the cerebrum (58.3%) was the most commonly affected site, followed by the renal and mesentery arteries (16.7% respectively). PDE with descending aorta thrombus and thrombus-straddled PFO was exceedingly rare with only several case reports.15, 16, 17, 18 We had 1 case of each. In a study by Loscalzo, 23% of their cases had 2 separate embolic sites, and 10% had 3. Dubiel et al found that 12.8% of their patients with PDE experienced multifocal arterial embolisms. In our cases, 3 of the patients (cases 1, 4, and 6) had 3 embolized sites, and the others had 2.

Treatment

The therapeutic options for PDE included surgical embolectomy, thrombolysis, and anticoagulation. The overall survival appeared equivalent among these 3 therapeutic options, although more complications occurred with anticoagulation and thrombolysis. Ward et al recommended that hemodynamically significant PDE should be treated with thrombolytic therapy. We believe that therapeutic options should depend on the risk stratification of PE and systemic arterial embolism. In case 3 with thrombus-straddled PFO, surgical embolectomy was emergently performed because of a high risk for a serious arterial embolism. In the 6 patients who received thrombolytic therapy, cases 4, 8, and 9 received such therapy due to severe systemic arterial embolisms and cases 5, 6, and 7 due to PE with significant hemodynamics or right ventricular dysfunction. Case 2 received anticoagulation therapy rather than thrombolysis because of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The other 3 also received anticoagulation therapy because they had lower risks of PE or cerebrovascular events. After a first PDE, the risk of recurrence was 3.4–3.8% per year. Nendaz et al recommended observation, antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies, and closure of the PFO for the prevention of recurrent arterial emboli after PDE. Ward et al suggested that warfarin should be continued for 3–6 months or indefinitely if the patient had a PFO or pulmonary hypertension. In a systematic review, Khairy et al demonstrated that an implantation of a PFO closure device could prevent recurrent thromboembolic events better than a medical therapy alone (warfarin or salicylate). However, Travis et al recommended closure of a PFO for patients with PDE only in whom a systemic anticoagulant was contraindicated. Decousus et al reported a reduction in the occurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic PE after IVCF implantation in patients with proximal DVT. In 8 patients with a complete follow-up in this study, 1 out of the 3 PFOs was repaired; 2 patients were implanted with an IVCF; they are all still on medication because they had an unsealed PFO, recurrence of DVT, persistent risk factors for thrombosis, or residual thrombus in the lower limb or pulmonary artery. There was no sign of pulmonary or arterial emboli nora clinically significant bleeding. The Cryptogenic Stroke Study has demonstrated that in patients with PFO, there was no significant difference in the time to the primary end points between those treated with warfarin and those treated with aspirin. Two of our patients who independently changed their treatment from warfarin to aspirin continued to perform well in their daily living.

Conclusions

PDE may not be rare as we have previously thought and may account for a significant minority of acute arterial occlusions in the absence of a clear cardiac or proximal arterial source. When a patient with systemic venous thrombosis also develops signs of systemic arterial embolism, the diagnosis of PDE should be considered, suggesting further studies. Recommendations for treatment should be individualized, including thrombolysis, anticoagulation, and /or embolectomy. We recommend a long-term anticoagulation therapy to prevent the recurrence of PDE for those with an abnormal intracardiac communication, persistent risk factors for thrombosis, or residual thrombus in the lower limb or pulmonary artery.

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  24 in total

1.  Paradoxical embolism.

Authors:  B I JOHNSON
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1951-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Cerebral infarction following thrombolysis for massive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Tim S Bracey; Chris Langrish; Mike Darby; Jasmeet Soar
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  The proper conduct of Valsalva maneuver in the detection of patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Tsung O Cheng
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  The role of thrombolytic therapy in the management of paradoxical embolism.

Authors:  A d'Audiffret; S S Shenoy; J J Ricotta; M Dryjski
Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-06

5.  A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group.

Authors:  H Decousus; A Leizorovicz; F Parent; Y Page; B Tardy; P Girard; S Laporte; R Faivre; B Charbonnier; F G Barral; Y Huet; G Simonneau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Patent foramen ovale in adult life.

Authors:  P T Wilmshurst; M A de Belder
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-03

7.  Paradoxical peripheral embolism coincident with acute pulmonary thromboembolism.

Authors:  Tatsuyuki Inoue; Futoshi Tadehara; Toshihide Hinoi; Shuji Tsujiyama; Shusuke Matsuo; Takeshi Shichijo; Tetsuya Ono; Michio Yamakido
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.271

8.  Paradoxical and pulmonary embolism due to a thrombus entrapped in a patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Ucar Ozgul; Zehra Golbasi; Okan Gulel; Nesligul Yildirim
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

9.  Etiology of peripheral arterial thromboembolism in young patients.

Authors:  A F AbuRahma; B K Richmond; P A Robinson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Diagnosis and treatment of paradoxical embolus.

Authors:  J A Travis; S B Fuller; J Ligush; G W Plonk; R L Geary; K J Hansen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics and follow-up results of 12 cases of paradoxical embolism.

Authors:  Hong-Liang Zhang; Zhi-Hong Liu; Qin Luo; Yong Wang; Zhi-Hui Zhao; Chang-Ming Xiong
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-03-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.