| Literature DB >> 29063040 |
Fang-Ye Li1, Xiao-Lei Chen1, Bai-Nan Xu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the beneficial effects of intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), multimodal neuronavigation, and intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring-guided surgery for treating supratentorial cavernomas.Entities:
Keywords: Cavernoma; Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring; Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging; Multimodal neuronavigation
Year: 2016 PMID: 29063040 PMCID: PMC5643761 DOI: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2016.11.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chronic Dis Transl Med ISSN: 2095-882X
Characteristics of 13 patients with supratentorial cavernomas.
| Patient No | Age (years) | Gender | Location (side) | Lesion volume (cm3) | Lesion to eloquent areas distance (mm) | Zabramski classification | Total iMRI scans | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motor—sensory | Language | Vision | |||||||||||||||
| fMRI | DTT | fMRI | DTT | fMRI | DTT | ||||||||||||
| H | F | L | M | S | B | W | AF | V | DB | ML | |||||||
| 1 | 10 | Female | Centrum Ovale (Left) | 0.20 | 10.8 | – | – | 3.6 | 0 | – | – | 8.7 | – | – | – | III | 3 |
| 2 | 32 | Female | Frontal (Left) | 1.83 | 10.4 | 3.8 | 29.3 | 1.4 | 7.8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | III | 1 |
| 3 | 19 | Male | Periventricular (Right) | 0.47 | – | – | – | 3.6 | 1.8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | III | 3 |
| 4 | 10 | Male | Centrum Ovale (Left) | 11.45 | 4.6 | – | 5.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 | – | – | 5.2 | – | – | – | III | 1 |
| 5 | 51 | Female | Temporal (Left) | 1.83 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.9 | 7.5 | I | 1 |
| 6 | 61 | Male | Trigono (Left) | 10.05 | – | – | – | 12.8 | 7.7 | – | – | 12.5 | – | 4.9 | 1.4 | I | 1 |
| 7 | 40 | Female | Temporal (Right) | 2.05 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5.3 | 0 | III | 1 |
| 8 | 21 | Male | Temporal (Right) | 2.87 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3.6 | 2.6 | III | 1 |
| 9 | 26 | Female | Occipital (Right) | 2.86 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8.1 | 11.6 | 12.3 | II | 2 |
| 10 | 55 | Male | Bifrontal (Left) | 0.47 | – | – | – | 31.0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | II | 2 |
| (Right) | 0.34 | – | – | – | 56 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | II | ||||
| 11 | 53 | Male | Thalamus (Right) | 0.51 | – | – | – | 2.4 | 0 | – | – | – | – | 5.6 | 6.3 | III | 3 |
| 12 | 58 | Female | Insular (Left) | 0.97 | – | – | – | 3.7 | 5.5 | – | – | 4.5 | – | 11.4 | 14.5 | III | 1 |
fMRI: functional magnetic resonance imaging; DTT: functional magnetic resonance imaging; iMRI: intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging; H: hand cortex; F: foot cortex; L: lips cortex; M: corticospinal tracts; S: medial lemniscus; B: Broca's area; W: Wernick's area; AF: arcuate fasciculus; V: visual occipital cortex; DB: dorsal bundles; ML: Meyer's loop.
13 patient's pre- and postoperative clinical assessment of supratentorial cavernomas.
| Patient No | Presenting symptoms | Preoperative clinical assessment | At discharge (short-term) | Follow-up periods (months) | Postoperative clinical assessment (long-term) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seizure | Right mild paresthesia | Right motor strength grade II | 18 | Right motor strength grade IV+ |
| 2 | Seizure | Normal | Normal | 8 | No deficits |
| 3 | Left hemiparesis | Left motor strength grade IV+ | Left motor strength grade IV+ | 21 | No deficits |
| 4 | Right hemiparesis | Right motor strength grade IV | Right motor strength grade IV− | 22 | No deficits |
| 5 | Seizure | Normal | Normal | 4 | No deficits |
| 6 | Seizure | Normal | Normal | 12 | No deficits |
| 7 | Seizure | Quadrantanopia | Quadrantanopia | 24 | Improved |
| 8 | Seizure | Normal | Normal | 14 | No deficits |
| 9 | Seizure | Normal | Normal | 20 | No deficits |
| 10 | Seizure | Normal | Normal | 24 | No deficits |
| 11 | Left paresthesia | Left moderate paresthesia | Left motor strength grade IV− | 19 | Left motor strength grade V |
| 12 | Seizure | Normal | Normal | 8 | No deficits |
Fig. 1A 32-year-old female patient (Patient 2 in Table 1) presented with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy. A–B. Conventional MRI showed a mixed-signal lesion (white arrow) with a surrounding hypointense rim in the left supplementary motor area. C–D. A 3D reconstructed view revealed the relationships between the lesion (green) and the hand cortex (red), corticospinal tracts (purple), medial lemniscus (pink), and foot cortex (sky blue).
Fig. 2A 32-year-old female patient (Patient 2 in Table 1) presented with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy. A. Intraoperatively navigated microscopic view before craniotomy. Contours of the lesion (green, white arrow), hand cortex (sky blue, black arrow) and corticospinal tracts (purple, double arrow) were projected onto the scalp and facilitated craniotomy. B. A navigated microscopic view exposed the posterior part of the lesion (white arrow, green contour). Hand cortex (sky blue contour), lip cortex (purple contour). C–D. Multimodal intraoperative MR imaging showed complete resection of the nidus. E–F. An intraoperative 3D-reconstructed view revealed that the corticospinal tracts (purple) and medial lemniscus (pink) were intact.
Fig. 3A 32-year-old female patient (Patient 2 in Table 1) presented with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy. A–B. Postoperative follow-up MR imaging confirmed the total resection of lesion (white arrow). C–D. A 3D reconstructed view showed the corticospinal tracts (purple), medial lemniscus (pink), hand cortex (red) and foot cortex (sky blue).