| Literature DB >> 29062793 |
Irene Tessaro1,2, Silvia Modina1,3, Valentina Lodde1, Giulia Sivelli1, Federica Franciosi1, Laura Terzaghi1, Patrizia Luchini4, Cristiano Rumio3,4, Alberto Maria Luciano1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polycystic-ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a reproductive illness characterized by hyperandrogenism and anovulation. Using hyperandrogenized mice, it was demonstrated that the oral administration of incremental dose of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) attenuated some of PCOS characteristics. This work aimed to study the effect of ultra-low doses of combined FSH and progesterone orally administered on PCOS murine model. Moreover, the effect of sequential kinetic activation of administered hormones was tested.Entities:
Keywords: FSH; Follicle cyst; Mouse; Polycystic ovary syndrome; Progesterone; Sequential kinetic activation; Ultra-low dose
Year: 2017 PMID: 29062793 PMCID: PMC5641438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Infertil ISSN: 2228-5482
Experimental design
| Sesame oil | Saline solution | |
| DHEA (1.2 | Saline solution | |
| DHEA (1.2 | activated FSH (0.44 pg)+activated P4 (0.44 | |
| DHEA (1.2 | not activated FSH (0.44 pg)+not activated P4 (0.44 |
Daily sub-cutaneous injection and per os administration for each experimental group composed of 8 mice. The duration of the treatment was 20 days
Effect of different hormonal treatments on body weight of mice
| 15.5±0.42a | 19.38±0.37b | |
| 16.63±0.46a | 21.38±0.37c | |
| 16.75±0.41a | 22.13±0.48c | |
| 15.75±0.67a | 21.13±0.81c |
Data were expressed as mean±SEM and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Fisher’s LSD multiple comparison test; different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p<0.05)
Effect of different hormonal treatments on testosterone (T), progesterone (P4), estradiol (E2) and luteinizing hormone (LH) serum concentration
| 0.21±0.01a | 12.75±3.09a | 1.43±0.15a | 0.53±0.06a | |
| 0.89±0.14b | 37.1±3.72b | 2.53±0.24b | 0.19±0.02b | |
| 0.92±0.2b | 30.45±3.44b | 1.65±0.21a | 0.15±0.01b | |
| 0.84±0.13b | 36.51±3.62b | 1.36±0.1a | 0.16±0.01b |
Data were expressed as mean±SEM and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Fisher’s LSD multiple comparison test. In each column, different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p<0.05)
Effect of different hormonal treatments on the wall thickness, on the number of antral follicles per ovary and the percentage of cystic/atretic follicles
| 28.83±1.32 | 64.87±4.71a | 12.63±1.18a | 0.75±0.36a | 26.82±5.66 | 0.25±0.16a | |
| 32.21±2.14 | 47.06±2.18b | 6.37±1.4b | 7.62±1.13b | 39.05±13.14 | 67.23±3.04b | |
| 33.32±2.7 | 47.39±1.75b | 10.25±0.99ab | 5.5±0.84 b | 24.11±6.79 | 42.76±6.01c | |
| 28.77±1.41 | 50.44±2.25b | 9.37±1.8ab | 5.1±0.85b | 16.67±5.32 | 34.06±9.41c | |
Data were expressed as mean±SEM and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Fisher’s LSD multiple comparison test. In each column, different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p<0.05)
Figure 1.Effect of different hormonal treatment on the percentage of follicles presenting atretic/cystic signs.
Descriptive images of peculiar morphological changes in antral follicle walls of ovaries isolated from controls (A, D) compared to DHEA-treated mice (B, C, E, F), stained with haematoxylin and eosin. In the control (A, D), theca externa, theca interna, basal membrane and granulosa cells layers appear normal. Cystic features are described by presence of spherical piknotic nuclei (B), loss of mural granulosa cells architecture (B and E, white arrows), depletion of basal membrane (B and E, asterisks), macrophages in the cystic fluid (B and F, red arrows), thin and elongated epithelioid cells in the inner surface of the wall (C and F, black arrows) and reduction of granulosa cells layers (C). Bars=50 μm
Figure 2.Immunohistochemical localization of aromatase cytochrome P450.
No or weak aromatase protein was noticed in early-small antral follicles (150–300 μm; on the left), as a positive staining was evident in large antral follicles (>300 μm; in the middle). Control specimens did not exhibit any positive staining (on the right). Scale bars=50 μm