| Literature DB >> 29062302 |
Vera Manageiro1,2, David Félix1, Daniela Jones-Dias1,2, Daniel A Sampaio3, Luís Vieira3, Luísa Sancho4, Eugénia Ferreira1, Manuela Caniça1.
Abstract
A new QepA4 variant was detected in an O86:H28 ST156-fimH38 Escherichia coli, showing a multidrug-resistance phenotype. PAβN inhibition of qepA4-harboring transconjugant resulted in increase of nalidixic acid accumulation. The qepA4 and catA1 genes were clustered in a 26.0-kp contig matching an IncF-type plasmid, and containing a Tn21-type transposon with multiple mobile genetic elements. This QepA variant is worrisome because these determinants might facilitate the selection of higher-level resistance mutants, playing a role in the development of resistance, and/or confer higher-level resistance to fluoroquinolones in association with chromosomal mutations.Entities:
Keywords: PaβN; QepA4; WGS; genetic characterization; quinolone resistance
Year: 2017 PMID: 29062302 PMCID: PMC5640717 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01899
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Comparison of amino acid substitutions, and epidemiology of first reports of clinical QepA-producing strains.
| Phe | Ala | Val | Ala | Pro | Trp | Met | Ala | Japan and Belgium (2007) | Périchon et al., | ||
| Gly | Ile | France (2008) | Cattoir et al., | ||||||||
| Glu | Leu | Cys | Lys | Thr | China (2015) | Wang et al., | |||||
| Leu | Ile | Portugal | This study | ||||||||
QepA-producing isolate, and respective human biological product of isolation (in parentheses), in the first report.
Country that first reported the PMQR, and year (in parenthesis).
MICs (mg/L) of antibiotics for the E. coli (Ec) strains: clinical INSRA6015, EcTOP10 (pBK-qepA1), and EcTOP10 (pBK-qepA4) transformants, and the recipient EcTOP10 (pBK-qepA−).
| β | ||||
| Amoxicillin | 1,024 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Amoxicillin + CLA | 128 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Ticarcillin | >4,096 | ≤0.125 | 4 | 4 |
| Piperacillin | 128 | ≤0.015 | 1 | 1 |
| Piperacillin + TAZ | 4 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 |
| Mecillinam | 1 | ≤0.015 | 0.25 | 0.125 |
| Cefuroxime | 16 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Ceftazidime | 8 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
| Ceftazidime + CLA | 8 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
| Ceftriaxone | 8 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Ceftriaxone + CLA | 4 | 0.03 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 |
| Cefotaxime | 4 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Cefotaxime + CLA | 4 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Cefoperazone | 8 | ≤0.25 | ≤0.25 | ≤0.25 |
| Cefepime | 0.125 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 | ≤0.015 |
| Cefoxitin | 32 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Aztreonam | 4 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Aztreonam + CLA | 4 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Imipenem | 0.125 | 0.125 | ≤0.06 | 0.125 |
| Kanamycin | 2 | ≤0.125 | ≤0.125 | ≤0.125 |
| Trimetoprim | >512 | ≤0.125 | ≤0.125 | ≤0.125 |
| Nalidixic Acid | >256 | ≤0.015 | 1 | 0.75 |
| Nalidixic Acid + PaβN | – | ≤0.015 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 1024 | ≤0.002 | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Ciprofloxacin + PaβN | – | ≤0.002 | 0.006 | ≤0.002 |
| Enrofloxacin | >32 | ≤0.002 | 0.004 | ≤0.002 |
| Enrofloxacin + PaβN | – | ≤0.002 | ≤0.002 | ≤0.002 |
| Gatifloxacin | >32 | ≤0.002 | 0.004 | ≤0.002 |
| Gatifloxacin + PaβN | – | ≤0.002 | ≤0.002 | ≤0.002 |
| Levofloxacin | >32 | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Levofloxacin + PaβN | – | ≤0.002 | ≤0.002 | ≤0.002 |
| Moxifloxacin | >32 | ≤0.002 | ≤0.002 | ≤0.002 |
| Moxifloxacin + PaβN | – | ≤0.002 | ≤0.002 | ≤0.002 |
| Norfloxacin | >256 | 0.016 | 0.38 | 0.094 |
| Norfloxacin + PaβN | – | 0.016 | 0.19 | 0.094 |
| Ofloxacin | >32 | 0.008 | 0.016 | 0.012 |
| Ofloxacin + PaβN | – | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
–, Non determined.
MICs determined by microdilution method.
MICs determined by E-test.
PaβN, efflux pump inhibitor phenyl-arginine-β-naphthylamide at 50 μg/mL.
Assembled contigs representing plasmids identified after BLASTn searched against the NCBI plasmid database.
| LLKU01000012 | 100 | 100 | |||
| 100 | 100 | ||||
| LLKU01000037 | 98 | 100 | |||
| LLKU01000042, LKU01000051 | 100 | 98 | |||
| 100 | 99 | ||||
| 98 | 99 | ||||
| 100 | 100 | ||||
| LLKU01000058 | |||||
| 100 | 100 | ||||
| LLKU01000068 | 99 | 99 | |||
| LLKU01000069 | 100 | 100 | |||
| LLKU01000073 | 100 | 100 |
Only the best BLASTn hit(s) reference plasmid sequence is shown (e value = 0.0, query cover ≥ 98% and identity ≥ 98%).
Contigs underlined includes the resistance determinants.
Figure 1Schematic representation of qepA4-harboring contig assembled using LLKU01000032, LLKU01000034, LLKU01000049, and LLKU01000073, with mean coverage of 134-fold and 59.0% of GC content. (A) The Tn21-like transposon included the transposition (tnp) region [comprising the transposase (tnpA), the resolvase (tnpR), and the putative transposition regulator (tnpM)]; the resolution site (res); and the mercury resistance (mer) operon [with the regulatory genes merR and merD, the structural genes merT, merP, merC, and merA, and two unknown reading frames: urf1 (also called merE) and urf2, downstream of merD]; (B) The urf2 gene was interrupted by a complete In227 integron, which variable region (vr) harbored a Δ dfrB4 and a qepA4 gene downstream an ISCR3 element, flanked upstream by an In211 integron; (C) Two ISs (IS1353 inserted into IS1326) interrupted the tniB (transposition of the integron) gene. IR, flanking inverted repeats; oriIS and terIS, origin and terminus of ISCR elements, respectively; vertical bars indicate IR of transposons (Tn), integrons (In) and insertion sequences (IS). Arrows indicate the direction of transcription of the various genes. Truncated genes are indicated by a Δ symbol.