| Literature DB >> 29062123 |
Eleanor J Sterling1, Christopher Filardi2, Anne Toomey2,3, Amanda Sigouin2, Erin Betley2, Nadav Gazit2, Jennifer Newell4, Simon Albert5, Diana Alvira6, Nadia Bergamini7, Mary Blair2, David Boseto8, Kate Burrows9, Nora Bynum6, Sophie Caillon10, Jennifer E Caselle11, Joachim Claudet12, Georgina Cullman2, Rachel Dacks13, Pablo B Eyzaguirre7, Steven Gray14, James Herrera15, Peter Kenilorea16, Kealohanuiopuna Kinney17,18, Natalie Kurashima19,20, Suzanne Macey2, Cynthia Malone2, Senoveva Mauli21, Joe McCarter2, Heather McMillen22, Pua'ala Pascua23, Patrick Pikacha5, Ana L Porzecanski2, Pascale de Robert24, Matthieu Salpeteur10, Myknee Sirikolo25, Mark H Stege26, Kristina Stege27, Tamara Ticktin19, Ron Vave28, Alaka Wali29, Paige West30, Kawika B Winter23,31, Stacy D Jupiter32.
Abstract
Monitoring and evaluation are central to ensuring that innovative, multi-scale, and interdisciplinary approaches to sustainability are effective. The development of relevant indicators for local sustainable management outcomes, and the ability to link these to broader national and international policy targets, are key challenges for resource managers, policymakers, and scientists. Sets of indicators that capture both ecological and social-cultural factors, and the feedbacks between them, can underpin cross-scale linkages that help bridge local and global scale initiatives to increase resilience of both humans and ecosystems. Here we argue that biocultural approaches, in combination with methods for synthesizing across evidence from multiple sources, are critical to developing metrics that facilitate linkages across scales and dimensions. Biocultural approaches explicitly start with and build on local cultural perspectives - encompassing values, knowledges, and needs - and recognize feedbacks between ecosystems and human well-being. Adoption of these approaches can encourage exchange between local and global actors, and facilitate identification of crucial problems and solutions that are missing from many regional and international framings of sustainability. Resource managers, scientists, and policymakers need to be thoughtful about not only what kinds of indicators are measured, but also how indicators are designed, implemented, measured, and ultimately combined to evaluate resource use and well-being. We conclude by providing suggestions for translating between local and global indicator efforts.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29062123 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0349-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Ecol Evol ISSN: 2397-334X Impact factor: 15.460