Literature DB >> 29061559

A Survey among Breast Cancer Specialists on the Low Uptake of Therapeutic Prevention with Tamoxifen or Raloxifene.

Silvia Noonan1, Ambra Pasa1, Vincenzo Fontana2, Silvia Caviglia1, Bernardo Bonanni3, Alberto Costa4, Samuel G Smith5, Fedro Peccatori4,6, Andrea DeCensi7,8.   

Abstract

With this survey, we aimed to address the reasons why physicians are reluctant to prescribe breast cancer-preventive therapy with the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) tamoxifen or raloxifene despite a strong evidence of efficacy. A self-administered 5-point Likert questionnaire was given during breast cancer meetings in Europe or sent via email to rank the importance of 10 predefined reasons for low uptake of SERMs for breast cancer therapeutic prevention. Analyses tested the associations between the stated reasons and physician characteristics such as gender, age, country of work, and specialty. Of 246 delivered questionnaires, 27 were incomplete and were excluded from analysis. Overall, there was a small variability in response scores, with a tendency for physicians to give moderate importance (score = 3) to all 10 statements. However, the top five reasons were: the expected greater preventive effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors (70.3% with score >3), difficulty applying current risk models in clinical practice (69.9%), the lack of clarity on the most appropriate physician for prevention advice (68.4%), the lack of reliable short-term biomarkers of effectiveness (67.5%), and the lack of commercial interest in therapeutic prevention (66.0%). The lack of reliable short-term biomarkers showed a tendency to discriminate between medical oncologists and other breast specialists (OR = 2.42; 95% CI, 0.93-6.25). This survey highlights the complexity of prescribing decisions among physicians in this context. Coupled with the known barriers among eligible women, these data may help to identify strategies to increase uptake of breast cancer therapeutic prevention. Cancer Prev Res; 11(1); 38-43. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29061559     DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-17-0162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  3 in total

1.  Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen to Prevent Local and Contralateral Recurrence in Breast Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Andrea DeCensi; Matteo Puntoni; Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga; Silvia Caviglia; Franca Avino; Laura Cortesi; Cristiana Taverniti; Maria Grazia Pacquola; Fabio Falcini; Marcella Gulisano; Maria Digennaro; Anna Cariello; Katia Cagossi; Graziella Pinotti; Matteo Lazzeroni; Davide Serrano; Daniela Branchi; Sara Campora; Marilena Petrera; Tania Buttiron Webber; Luca Boni; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Accuracy of Risk Estimates from the iPrevent Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Management Tool.

Authors:  Kelly-Anne Phillips; Yuyan Liao; Roger L Milne; Robert J MacInnis; Ian M Collins; Richard Buchsbaum; Prue C Weideman; Adrian Bickerstaffe; Stephanie Nesci; Wendy K Chung; Melissa C Southey; Julia A Knight; Alice S Whittemore; Gillian S Dite; David Goldgar; Graham G Giles; Gord Glendon; Jack Cuzick; Antonis C Antoniou; Irene L Andrulis; Esther M John; Mary B Daly; Saundra S Buys; John L Hopper; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-09-19

3.  Understanding low chemoprevention uptake by women at high risk of breast cancer: findings from a qualitative inductive study of women's risk-reduction experiences.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Megan Hils; Anna Muraveva
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.