Literature DB >> 29061529

Automatic and robust noise suppression in EEG and MEG: The SOUND algorithm.

Tuomas P Mutanen1, Johanna Metsomaa2, Sara Liljander3, Risto J Ilmoniemi2.   

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) often suffer from noise- and artifact-contaminated channels and trials. Conventionally, EEG and MEG data are inspected visually and cleaned accordingly, e.g., by identifying and rejecting the so-called "bad" channels. This approach has several shortcomings: data inspection is laborious, the rejection criteria are subjective, and the process does not fully utilize all the information in the collected data. Here, we present noise-cleaning methods based on modeling the multi-sensor and multi-trial data. These approaches offer objective, automatic, and robust removal of noise and disturbances by taking into account the sensor- or trial-specific signal-to-noise ratios. We introduce a method called the source-estimate-utilizing noise-discarding algorithm (the SOUND algorithm). SOUND employs anatomical information of the head to cross-validate the data between the sensors. As a result, we are able to identify and suppress noise and artifacts in EEG and MEG. Furthermore, we discuss the theoretical background of SOUND and show that it is a special case of the well-known Wiener estimators. We explain how a completely data-driven Wiener estimator (DDWiener) can be used when no anatomical information is available. DDWiener is easily applicable to any linear multivariate problem; as a demonstrative example, we show how DDWiener can be utilized when estimating event-related EEG/MEG responses. We validated the performance of SOUND with simulations and by applying SOUND to multiple EEG and MEG datasets. SOUND considerably improved the data quality, exceeding the performance of the widely used channel-rejection and interpolation scheme. SOUND also helped in localizing the underlying neural activity by preventing noise from contaminating the source estimates. SOUND can be used to detect and reject noise in functional brain data, enabling improved identification of active brain areas.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifacts; Cross-validation; Electroencephalography; Magnetoencephalography; Minimum-norm estimation; Noise; Wiener estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29061529     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Pantelis Lioumis; Reza Zomorrodi; Itay Hadas; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Daniel M Blumberger
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  A TMS/EEG protocol for the causal assessment of the functions of the oscillatory brain rhythms in perceptual and cognitive processes.

Authors:  Jelena Trajkovic; Francesco Di Gregorio; Eleonora Marcantoni; Gregor Thut; Vincenzo Romei
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2022-06-04

3.  Transcranial Evoked Potentials Can Be Reliably Recorded with Active Electrodes.

Authors:  Marco Mancuso; Valerio Sveva; Alessandro Cruciani; Katlyn Brown; Jaime Ibáñez; Vishal Rawji; Elias Casula; Isabella Premoli; Sasha D'Ambrosio; John Rothwell; Lorenzo Rocchi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-22

4.  Neurophysiological Effect of Ketamine on Prefrontal Cortex in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Study.

Authors:  Nithya Ramakrishnan; Nicholas R E Murphy; Christopher P Walker; Valeria A Cuellar Leal; Jair C Soares; Raymond Y J Cho; Sudhakar Selvaraj
Journal:  Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks)       Date:  2019-07-23

5.  Brain Gray Matter Alterations in Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Voxel-Based Meta-Analysis of Whole-Brain Studies.

Authors:  Licheng Zhu; Weihua Zhang; Lei Chen; Yanqiao Ren; Yanyan Cao; Tao Sun; Bo Sun; Jia Liu; Jing Wang; Chuansheng Zheng
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  Splitting of the magnetic encephalogram into «brain» and «non-brain» physiological signals based on the joint analysis of frequency-pattern functional tomograms and magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Rodolfo R Llinás; Stanislav Rykunov; Kerry D Walton; Anna Boyko; Mikhail Ustinin
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  M1-P15 as a cortical marker for transcallosal inhibition: A preregistered TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Agnese Zazio; Guido Barchiesi; Clarissa Ferrari; Eleonora Marcantoni; Marta Bortoletto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  The effects of NMDA receptor blockade on TMS-evoked EEG potentials from prefrontal and parietal cortex.

Authors:  Nigel C Rogasch; Carl Zipser; Ghazaleh Darmani; Tuomas P Mutanen; Mana Biabani; Christoph Zrenner; Debora Desideri; Paolo Belardinelli; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Peak Detection with Online Electroencephalography (EEG) Artifact Removal for Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Purposes.

Authors:  Mihaly Benda; Ivan Volosyak
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-11-29

10.  Closed-loop optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography feedback.

Authors:  Aino E Tervo; Jaakko O Nieminen; Pantelis Lioumis; Johanna Metsomaa; Victor H Souza; Heikki Sinisalo; Matti Stenroos; Jukka Sarvas; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 8.955

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.