| Literature DB >> 29059721 |
Genki Ishigaki1, Pattama Nitthaisong2, Yogi Sidik Prasojo3, Ikuo Kobayashi1, Kiichi Fukuyama1, Mohammad Mijanur Rahman4, Ryo Akashi2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The preference evaluation of cattle is an important factor for estimation and improvement of the grazing amounts of newly introduced or bred grasses or cultivars in barn. This study was performed to assess the grazing behavior (the amount of grazing and/or the grazing speed) of cattle as indirect method using newly bred Brachiaria ruziziensis tetraploid strain 'OKI-1'(BR) hay as treatment group and Cloris gayana 'Callide' (CG) hay as control group. It also compared the feasibility of using behavioral differences between two groups as one criteria for evaluating preference by Japanese black cattle in barn. <br> METHODS: Three experiments were carried out using 12 growing Japanese Black cattle including 6 males and 6 females. In each experiment, the four Japanese Black cattle (2 males and 2 females) were placed in separated stall and allowed to graze BR and CG in manger that was separated into two portions for about 30 min. The position and behavior of the cattle were recorded, and weighed the residual of each gay at 15 and 30 minutes after experiment start. <br> RESULTS: The BR was superior to CG in chemical composition such as protein, fibers and non-fibrous carbohydrate. The cattle, over all, tended to prefer BR over CG in the first half 15 minutes in terms of the time spent and amount of grazing. Additionally, growing cattle exhibited neophilia for BR bred newly. <br> CONCLUSION: These findings indicated the current approach could be applied for one of criteria to evaluate the preference of hay by Japanese black cattle under indoor housing environment.Entities:
Keywords: Brachiaria ruziziensis; Chloris gayana; Grazing Behavior; Indoor Housing; Japanese Black Cattle; Preference
Year: 2017 PMID: 29059721 PMCID: PMC5930286 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.17.0543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Figure 1Experimental plot image; 1, 2: Ruzigrass tetraploid strain or rhodesgrass. The position of two grasses were replaced everyday. 3: Black sheet were set until when the experiment started. 4: Water cup point.
Agronomic traits and dry matter yield of BR (Brachiaria ruziziensis, tetraploid strain) and CG (Cloris gayana) for 1st cutting
| Grass species | Plant length (cm) | Stem diameter (cm) | Leaf blade width (cm) | Leaf blade length (cm) | Fresh matter yield (t/ha) | Dry matter (%) | Dry matter yield (t/ha) | The ratio of the leaf blade weight against whole plant (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR | 116.3 | 4.2 | 2.3 | 36.6 | 3,717 | 19 | 593 | 37.8 |
| CG | 126.6 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 58.2 | 2,583 | 24 | 605 | 43.8 |
Values followed by different superscript letters within each column differ significantly (p<0.05) by t-test.
Chemical composition of three forage grasses and concentrates feed
| Feeds | CP (DM %) | NDICP (CP %) | NDF (DM %) | ADF (DM %) | ADL (DM %) | Ash (DM %) | EE (DM %) | NFC (DM %) | TDN (DM %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR | 12.2 | 29.1 | 63.0 | 35.1 | 4.2 | 11.9 | 2.0 | 14.5 | 54.6 |
| CG | 10.5 | 43.3 | 69.6 | 38.8 | 4.2 | 10.2 | 2.2 | 12.0 | 54.5 |
| PM | 11.2 | 40.4 | 70.6 | 39.6 | 4.1 | 10.3 | 2.0 | 10.4 | 54.3 |
| Concentrates | 21.2 | - | - | - | - | 6.3 | 2.7 | - | 75.0 |
CP, crude protein between BR (Brachiaria ruziziensis, tetraploid strain) and CG (Cloris gayana); DM, dry matter; NDICP, neutral detergent insoluble protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ADL, acid detergent lignin; EE, ether extract; NFC, non-fibrous carbohydrate; TDN, total digestible nutrients; PM (Panicum maximum), Guinea.
The concentrates feed contained maize, wheat bran, soybean meal, dicalcium phosphate, salt and feed additives.
Values followed by different superscript letters differ significantly (p<0.05) by t-test.
Switches by cattle between BR (Brachiaria ruziziensis, tetraploid strain) and CG (Cloris gayana) under indoor housing condition
| Number of visiting to BR plot | Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | Experiment 3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| 1 d | 2 d | 3 d | 4 d | 1 d | 2 d | 3 d | 4 d | 1 d | 2 d | 3 d | 4 d | |
| Times/0–15 min | 2.8 (0.9) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.3 (0.8) | 1.3 (0.5) | 5.3 (1.4) | 6.5 (1.8) | 2.3 (0.8) | 9.0 (2.6) | 3.3 (0.6) | 2.8 (1.0) | 2.0 (0.6) | 2.5 (1.3) |
| Times/15–30 min | 5.5 (1.7) | 4.3 (1.0) | 2.0 (0.7) | 1.8 (0.8) | 3.0 (0.4) | 5.3 (1.3) | 2.0 (1.7) | 7.3 (1.3) | 3.5 (1.0) | 2.8 (1.3) | 4.8 (2.1) | 3.3 (1.1) |
Figures in parentheses represent standard error (SE).
Figure 2The chronological change for the proportion of time spent grazing ruzigrass tetraploid strain (BR, open columns) hay and Rhodes grass (CG, hatched columns) hay by cattle. The broken lines indicate the proportion of the amount of hay fed with the two grasses (BR:CG = 0.5:0.5). * Indicates a significant bias from the hay fed proportion at p<0.05. BR, Brachiaria ruziziensis; CG, Cloris gayana.
Figure 3The chronological change for the proportion of grazing amount of ruzigrass tetraploid strain (BR, open columns) hay and Rhodes grass (CG, hatched columns) hay by cattle. The broken lines indicate the proportion of the amount of hay fed with the two grasses (BR:CG = 0.5:0.5). * Indicates a significant bias from the hay fed proportion at p<0.05. BR, Brachiaria ruziziensis; CG, Cloris gayana.
Figure 4The chronological change for the proportion of time spent grazing ruzigrass tetraploid strain (BR, open columns) hay and Rhodes grass (CG, hatched columns) hay expressed by sex. The broken lines indicate the proportion of the amount of hay fed with the two grasses (BR:CG = 0.5:0.5). There was no significant bias between BR and CG. BR, Brachiaria ruziziensis; CG, Cloris gayana.
Relationship between time spent BR (Brachiaria ruziziensis) in the first half 15 minutes and age in days of cattle
| Variable | Experiment day | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 1 d | 2 d | 3 d | 4 d | |
| Whole animals | 0.489 (0.196) | 0.397 (0.201) | −0.364 (0.244) | 0.180 (0.577) |
| Male | 0.617 (0.192) | −0.05 (0.924) | −0.09 (0.924) | −0.20 (0.705) |
| Female | 0.248 (0.640) | 0.913**(0.01) | −0.763 (0.08) | 0.531 (0.279) |
Figures in parentheses represent probability. Correlation with ** is significant at p<0.0.