Literature DB >> 29059535

Human reconstructed skin xenografts on mice to model skin physiology.

Giorgiana Salgado1, Yi Zhen Ng1, Li Fang Koh1, Christabelle S M Goh1, John E Common2.   

Abstract

Xenograft models to study skin physiology have been popular for scientific use since the 1970s, with various developments and improvements to the techniques over the decades. Xenograft models are particularly useful and sought after due to the lack of clinically relevant animal models in predicting drug effectiveness in humans. Such predictions could in turn boost the process of drug discovery, since novel drug compounds have an estimated 8% chance of FDA approval despite years of rigorous preclinical testing and evaluation, albeit mostly in non-human models. In the case of skin research, the mouse persists as the most popular animal model of choice, despite its well-known anatomical differences with human skin. Differences in skin biology are especially evident when trying to dissect more complex skin conditions, such as psoriasis and eczema, where interactions between the immune system, epidermis and the environment likely occur. While the use of animal models are still considered the gold standard for systemic toxicity studies under controlled environments, there are now alternative models that have been approved for certain applications. To overcome the biological limitations of the mouse model, research efforts have also focused on "humanizing" the mice model to better recapitulate human skin physiology. In this review, we outline the different approaches undertaken thus far to study skin biology using human tissue xenografts in mice and the technical challenges involved. We also describe more recent developments to generate humanized multi-tissue compartment mice that carry both a functioning human immune system and skin xenografts. Such composite animal models provide promising opportunities to study drugs, disease and differentiation with greater clinical relevance.
Copyright © 2017 International Society of Differentiation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human immune system; Human skin xenografts; Human-mouse chimera; Humanized mouse; Skin transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29059535     DOI: 10.1016/j.diff.2017.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Differentiation        ISSN: 0301-4681            Impact factor:   3.880


  7 in total

1.  Human Three-Dimensional Models for Studying Skin Pathogens.

Authors:  Elena Boero; Malgorzata Ewa Mnich; Andrea Guido Oreste Manetti; Elisabetta Soldaini; Luca Grimaldi; Fabio Bagnoli
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  A Novel Xenograft Model Demonstrates Human Fibroblast Behavior During Skin Wound Repair and Fibrosis.

Authors:  Mimi R Borrelli; Abra H Shen; Michelle Griffin; Shamik Mascharak; Sandeep Adem; Nestor M Diaz Deleon; Ledibabari Mildred Ngaage; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan; Hermann Peter Lorenz
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.947

Review 3.  Generation and characterization of hair-bearing skin organoids from human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Wouter H van der Valk; Sara A Serdy; CiCi Deakin; Jiyoon Lee; Jin Kim; Anh Phuong Le; Karl R Koehler
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 17.021

4.  PEG-Plasma Hydrogels Increase Epithelialization Using a Human Ex Vivo Skin Model.

Authors:  Randolph Stone; John T Wall; Shanmugasundaram Natesan; Robert J Christy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Transcriptomic Analysis of a Diabetic Skin-Humanized Mouse Model Dissects Molecular Pathways Underlying the Delayed Wound Healing Response.

Authors:  Carlos León; Francisco García-García; Sara Llames; Eva García-Pérez; Marta Carretero; María Del Carmen Arriba; Joaquín Dopazo; Marcela Del Río; María José Escámez; Lucía Martínez-Santamaría
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  The Rho guanosine nucleotide exchange factors Vav2 and Vav3 modulate epidermal stem cell function.

Authors:  L Francisco Lorenzo-Martín; Mauricio Menacho-Márquez; Natalia Fernández-Parejo; Sonia Rodríguez-Fdez; Gloria Pascual; Antonio Abad; Piero Crespo; Mercedes Dosil; Salvador A Benitah; Xosé R Bustelo
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 8.756

7.  Oral implant osseointegration model in C57Bl/6 mice: microtomographic, histological, histomorphometric and molecular characterization.

Authors:  Claudia Cristina Biguetti; Franco Cavalla; Elcia M Silveira; Angélica Cristina Fonseca; Andreia Espindola Vieira; Andre Petenuci Tabanez; Danieli C Rodrigues; Ana Paula Favaro Trombone; Gustavo Pompermaier Garlet
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.