Literature DB >> 29059525

Dynamic Histogram Analysis To Determine Free Energies and Rates from Biased Simulations.

Lukas S Stelzl1, Adam Kells2, Edina Rosta2, Gerhard Hummer1,3.   

Abstract

We present an algorithm to calculate free energies and rates from molecular simulations on biased potential energy surfaces. As input, it uses the accumulated times spent in each state or bin of a histogram and counts of transitions between them. Optimal unbiased equilibrium free energies for each of the states/bins are then obtained by maximizing the likelihood of a master equation (i.e., first-order kinetic rate model). The resulting free energies also determine the optimal rate coefficients for transitions between the states or bins on the biased potentials. Unbiased rates can be estimated, e.g., by imposing a linear free energy condition in the likelihood maximization. The resulting "dynamic histogram analysis method extended to detailed balance" (DHAMed) builds on the DHAM method. It is also closely related to the transition-based reweighting analysis method (TRAM) and the discrete TRAM (dTRAM). However, in the continuous-time formulation of DHAMed, the detailed balance constraints are more easily accounted for, resulting in compact expressions amenable to efficient numerical treatment. DHAMed produces accurate free energies in cases where the common weighted-histogram analysis method (WHAM) for umbrella sampling fails because of slow dynamics within the windows. Even in the limit of completely uncorrelated data, where WHAM is optimal in the maximum-likelihood sense, DHAMed results are nearly indistinguishable. We illustrate DHAMed with applications to ion channel conduction, RNA duplex formation, α-helix folding, and rate calculations from accelerated molecular dynamics. DHAMed can also be used to construct Markov state models from biased or replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations. By using binless WHAM formulated as a numerical minimization problem, the bias factors for the individual states can be determined efficiently in a preprocessing step and, if needed, optimized globally afterward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29059525     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  14 in total

1.  Coarse-Grained Simulations of DNA Reveal Angular Dependence of Sticky-End Binding.

Authors:  Nicholas M Gravina; James C Gumbart; Harold D Kim
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 2.  RNA Structural Dynamics As Captured by Molecular Simulations: A Comprehensive Overview.

Authors:  Jiří Šponer; Giovanni Bussi; Miroslav Krepl; Pavel Banáš; Sandro Bottaro; Richard A Cunha; Alejandro Gil-Ley; Giovanni Pinamonti; Simón Poblete; Petr Jurečka; Nils G Walter; Michal Otyepka
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Adaptive Markov state model estimation using short reseeding trajectories.

Authors:  Hongbin Wan; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Estimation of binding rates and affinities from multiensemble Markov models and ligand decoupling.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 5.  Enhanced-Sampling Simulations for the Estimation of Ligand Binding Kinetics: Current Status and Perspective.

Authors:  Katya Ahmad; Andrea Rizzi; Riccardo Capelli; Davide Mandelli; Wenping Lyu; Paolo Carloni
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-08

6.  Water-Gated Proton Transfer Dynamics in Respiratory Complex I.

Authors:  Max E Mühlbauer; Patricia Saura; Franziska Nuber; Andrea Di Luca; Thorsten Friedrich; Ville R I Kaila
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Atomistic mechanism of transmembrane helix association.

Authors:  Jan Domański; Mark S P Sansom; Phillip J Stansfeld; Robert B Best
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.779

8.  Dynamics Rationalize Proteolytic Susceptibility of the Major Birch Pollen Allergen Bet v 1.

Authors:  Anna S Kamenik; Florian Hofer; Philip H Handle; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-02-20

9.  Quantitative comparison between sub-millisecond time resolution single-molecule FRET measurements and 10-second molecular simulations of a biosensor protein.

Authors:  Dylan Girodat; Avik K Pati; Daniel S Terry; Scott C Blanchard; Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Computational methods for exploring protein conformations.

Authors:  Jane R Allison
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.