Literature DB >> 29059438

Loss of DNA Damage Response in Neuroblastoma and Utility of a PARP Inhibitor.

Masatoshi Takagi1, Misa Yoshida1, Yoshino Nemoto1, Hiroyuki Tamaichi1, Rika Tsuchida1, Masafumi Seki1, Kumiko Uryu1, Rina Nishii1, Satoshi Miyamoto1, Masahiro Saito1, Ryoji Hanada1, Hideo Kaneko1, Satoru Miyano1, Keisuke Kataoka1, Kenichi Yoshida1, Miki Ohira1, Yasuhide Hayashi1, Akira Nakagawara1, Seishi Ogawa1, Shuki Mizutani1, Junko Takita1.   

Abstract

Background: Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common solid tumor found in children, and deletions within the 11q region are observed in 11% to 48% of these tumors. Notably, such tumors are associated with poor prognosis; however, little is known regarding the molecular targets located in 11q.
Methods: Genomic alterations of ATM , DNA damage response (DDR)-associated genes located in 11q ( MRE11A, H2AFX , and CHEK1 ), and BRCA1, BARD1, CHEK2, MDM2 , and TP53 were investigated in 45 NB-derived cell lines and 237 fresh tumor samples. PARP (poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase) inhibitor sensitivity of NB was investigated in in vitro and invivo xenograft models. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: Among 237 fresh tumor samples, ATM, MRE11A, H2AFX , and/or CHEK1 loss or imbalance in 11q was detected in 20.7% of NBs, 89.8% of which were stage III or IV. An additional 7.2% contained ATM rare single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Rare SNVs in DDR-associated genes other than ATM were detected in 26.4% and were mutually exclusive. Overall, samples with SNVs and/or copy number alterations in these genes accounted for 48.4%. ATM-defective cells are known to exhibit dysfunctions in homologous recombination repair, suggesting a potential for synthetic lethality by PARP inhibition. Indeed, 83.3% NB-derived cell lines exhibited sensitivity to PARP inhibition. In addition, NB growth was markedly attenuated in the xenograft group receiving PARP inhibitors (sham-treated vs olaprib-treated group; mean [SD] tumor volume of sham-treated vs olaprib-treated groups = 7377 [1451] m 3 vs 298 [312] m 3 , P = .001, n = 4). Conclusions: Genomic alterations of DDR-associated genes including ATM, which regulates homologous recombination repair, were observed in almost half of NBs, suggesting that synthetic lethality could be induced by treatment with a PARP inhibitor. Indeed, DDR-defective NB cell lines were sensitive to PARP inhibitors. Thus, PARP inhibitors represent candidate NB therapeutics.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29059438     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  18 in total

1.  An overview of neuroblastoma cell lineage phenotypes and in vitro models.

Authors:  Sheron Campos Cogo; Thatyanne Gradowski Farias da Costa do Nascimento; Fernanda de Almeida Brehm Pinhatti; Nilton de França Junior; Bruna Santos Rodrigues; Luciane Regina Cavalli; Selene Elifio-Esposito
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-08-12

Review 2.  The Effects of Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations of BARD1 on the Development of Non-Breast and Non-Gynecological Cancers.

Authors:  Andrea K Watters; Emily S Seltzer; Danny MacKenzie; Melody Young; Jonathan Muratori; Rama Hussein; Andrej M Sodoma; Julie To; Manrose Singh; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  MYCN expression induces replication stress and sensitivity to PARP inhibition in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  David King; Xiao Dun Li; Gilberto S Almeida; Colin Kwok; Polly Gravells; Daniel Harrison; Saoirse Burke; Albert Hallsworth; Yann Jamin; Sally George; Simon P Robinson; Christopher J Lord; Evon Poon; Daniel Yeomanson; Louis Chesler; Helen E Bryant
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-06-09

4.  Clinical Features of Neuroblastoma With 11q Deletion: An Increase in Relapse Probabilities In Localized And 4S Stages.

Authors:  Antonio Juan Ribelles; Sandra Barberá; Yania Yáñez; Pablo Gargallo; Vanessa Segura; Bárbara Juan; Rosa Noguera; Marta Piqueras; Victoria Fornés-Ferrer; Jaime Font de Mora; Adela Cañete; Victoria Castel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  ATR Inhibition Potentiates PARP Inhibitor Cytotoxicity in High Risk Neuroblastoma Cell Lines by Multiple Mechanisms.

Authors:  Harriet E D Southgate; Lindi Chen; Deborah A Tweddle; Nicola J Curtin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex alterations and DNA damage response: implications for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Lei Bian; Yiling Meng; Meichao Zhang; Dong Li
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 7.  Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?

Authors:  Kiyohiro Ando; Akira Nakagawara
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 8.  Deoxyribonucleic Acid Damage and Repair: Capitalizing on Our Understanding of the Mechanisms of Maintaining Genomic Integrity for Therapeutic Purposes.

Authors:  Jolene Michelle Helena; Anna Margaretha Joubert; Simone Grobbelaar; Elsie Magdalena Nolte; Marcel Nel; Michael Sean Pepper; Magdalena Coetzee; Anne Elisabeth Mercier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Phase I clinical study of oral olaparib in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: study protocol.

Authors:  Masatoshi Takagi; Chitose Ogawa; Yuki Aoki-Nogami; Tomoko Iehara; Eri Ishibashi; Minoru Imai; Tetsuro Kihara; Kiyoshi Nobori; Kazuhisa Hasebe; Shuki Mizutani; Toshimi Kimura; Masashi Nagata; Masato Yasuhara; Kenichi Yoshimura; Pariko Yorozu; Hajime Hosoi; Ryuji Koike
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 10.  Inhibition of DNA Repair in Cancer Therapy: Toward a Multi-Target Approach.

Authors:  Samuele Lodovichi; Tiziana Cervelli; Achille Pellicioli; Alvaro Galli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.