Literature DB >> 29059413

The Time-Varying Relations Between Risk Factors and Smoking Before and After a Quit Attempt.

Matthew D Koslovsky1, Emily T Hébert2, Michael D Swartz1, Wenyaw Chan1, Luis Leon-Novelo1, Anna V Wilkinson3, Darla E Kendzor2,4, Michael S Businelle2,4.   

Abstract

Introduction: Intensive longitudinal data (ILD) collected with ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) can provide a rich resource for understanding the relations between risk factors and smoking in the time surrounding a cessation attempt.
Methods: Participants (N = 142) were smokers seeking treatment at a safety-net hospital smoking cessation clinic who were randomly assigned to receive standard clinic care (ie, counseling and cessation medications) or standard care plus small financial incentives for biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence. Participants completed EMAs via study provided smartphones several times per day for 14 days (1 week prequit through 1 week postquit). EMAs assessed current contextual factors including environmental (eg, easy access to cigarettes, being around others smoking), cognitive (eg, urge to smoke, stress, coping expectancies, cessation motivation, cessation self-efficacy, restlessness), behavioral (ie, recent smoking and alcohol consumption), and affective variables. Temporal relations between risk factors and smoking were assessed using a logistic time-varying effect model.
Results: Participants were primarily female (57.8%) and Black (71.8%), with an annual household income of <$20000 per year (71.8%), who smoked 17.6 cigarettes per day (SD = 8.8). Individuals assigned to the financial incentives group had decreased odds of smoking compared with those assigned to usual care beginning 3 days before the quit attempt and continuing throughout the first week postquit. Environmental, cognitive, affective, and behavioral variables had complex time-varying impacts on smoking before and after the scheduled quit attempt. Conclusions: Knowledge of time-varying effects may facilitate the development of interventions that target specific psychosocial and behavioral variables at critical moments in the weeks surrounding a quit attempt. Implications: Previous research has examined time-varying relations between smoking and negative affect, urge to smoke, smoking dependence, and certain smoking cessation therapies. We extend this work using ILD of unexplored variables in a socioeconomically disadvantaged sample of smokers seeking cessation treatment. These findings could be used to inform ecological momentary interventions that deliver treatment resources (eg, video- or text-based content) to individuals based upon critical variables surrounding their attempt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29059413      PMCID: PMC6121909          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  34 in total

1.  Does smoking abstinence self-efficacy vary across situations? Identifying context-specificity within the Relapse Situation Efficacy Questionnaire.

Authors:  C J Gwaltney; S Shiffman; G J Norman; J A Paty; J D Kassel; M Gnys; M Hickcox; A Waters; M Balabanis
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2001-06

2.  Financial incentives for abstinence among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals in smoking cessation treatment.

Authors:  Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle; Insiya B Poonawalla; Erica L Cuate; Anshula Kesh; Debra M Rios; Ping Ma; David S Balis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; James S Marks; Donna F Stroup; Julie L Gerberding
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Relapse to smoking.

Authors:  Thomas M Piasecki
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-12-13

5.  Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaolei Zhou; James Nonnemaker; Beth Sherrill; Alicia W Gilsenan; Florence Coste; Robert West
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 6.  The accuracy of self-reported smoking: a systematic review of the relationship between self-reported and cotinine-assessed smoking status.

Authors:  Sarah Connor Gorber; Sean Schofield-Hurwitz; Jill Hardt; Geneviève Levasseur; Mark Tremblay
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Modeling complexity of EMA data: time-varying lagged effects of negative affect on smoking urges for subgroups of nicotine addiction.

Authors:  Mariya Shiyko; Pamela Naab; Saul Shiffman; Runze Li
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Using the time-varying effect model (TVEM) to examine dynamic associations between negative affect and self confidence on smoking urges: differences between successful quitters and relapsers.

Authors:  Mariya P Shiyko; Stephanie T Lanza; Xianming Tan; Runze Li; Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2012-06

9.  The effectiveness of personally tailored computer-generated advice letters for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Ron Borland; James Balmford; Deon Hunt
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  An Ecological Momentary Intervention for Smoking Cessation: Evaluation of Feasibility and Effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael S Businelle; Ping Ma; Darla E Kendzor; Summer G Frank; Damon J Vidrine; David W Wetter
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  7 in total

1.  The interaction of sociodemographic risk factors and measures of nicotine dependence in predicting maternal smoking during pregnancy.

Authors:  Alexandra N Houston-Ludlam; Kathleen K Bucholz; Julia D Grant; Mary Waldron; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew C Heath
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Evaluating the influences of social support and smoking cues on daily smoking abstinence among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults.

Authors:  Joseph J C Waring; Emily T Hébert; Adam C Alexander; Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 3.  Technology-mediated just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to reduce harmful substance use: a systematic review.

Authors:  Olga Perski; Emily T Hébert; Felix Naughton; Eric B Hekler; Jamie Brown; Michael S Businelle
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  A BAYESIAN TIME-VARYING EFFECT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL MHEALTH DATA.

Authors:  Matthew D Koslovsky; Emily T Hébert; Michael S Businelle; Marina Vannucci
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Smoking trajectory and cancer risk: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Minh N Luu; Minji Han; Tra T Bui; Phuong Thao T Tran; Min-Kyung Lim; Jin K Oh
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 5.163

6.  Are Machine Learning Methods the Future for Smoking Cessation Apps?

Authors:  Maryam Abo-Tabik; Yael Benn; Nicholas Costen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Bayesian structural time series for biomedical sensor data: A flexible modeling framework for evaluating interventions.

Authors:  Jason Liu; Daniel J Spakowicz; Garrett I Ash; Rebecca Hoyd; Rohan Ahluwalia; Andrew Zhang; Shaoke Lou; Donghoon Lee; Jing Zhang; Carolyn Presley; Ann Greene; Matthew Stults-Kolehmainen; Laura M Nally; Julien S Baker; Lisa M Fucito; Stuart A Weinzimer; Andrew V Papachristos; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.