Importance: Accumulation of the protein tau is a defining characteristic of several neurodegenerative diseases. Thorough assessment of transgenic (Tg) mouse lines that replicate this process is critical for establishing the models used for testing anti-tau therapeutics in vivo. Objective: To define a consistent mouse model of disease for use in future compound efficacy studies. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this time course study, cohorts of Tg and control mice were euthanized at defined intervals. Collected brains were bisected down the midline. One half was frozen and used to measure the tau prion content, while the other half was fixed for immunostaining with anti-tau antibodies. All mice were maintained at the Hunters Point Animal Facility at the University of California, San Francisco, and all experiments were performed at the Mission Bay Campus of the University of California, San Francisco. Study animals were PS19, homozygous and hemizygous Tg(MAPT*P301S), and B6/J mice. The study dates were August 9, 2010, to October 3, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Tau prions were measured using a cell-based assay. Neuropathology was measured by determining the percentage area positive for immunostaining in defined brain regions. A separate cohort of mice was aged until each mouse developed neurological signs as determined by trained animal technicians to assess mortality. Results: A total of 1035 mice were used in this time course study. These included PS19 mice (51.2% [126 of 246] male and 48.8% [120 of 246] female), Tg(MAPT*P301S+/+) mice (52.3% [216 of 413] male, 43.8% [181 of 413] female, and 3.9% [16 of 413] undetermined), Tg(MAPT*P301S+/-) mice (51.8% [101 of 195] male and 48.2% [94 of 195] female), and B6/J mice (49.7% [90 of 181] male and 50.3% [91 of 181] female). While considerable interanimal variability in neuropathology, disease onset, and tau prion formation in the PS19 mice was observed, all 3 measures of disease were more uniform in the Tg(MAPT*P301S+/+) mice. Comparing tau prion formation in Tg(MAPT*P301S+/+) mice with B6/J controls, the 95% CIs for the 2 mouse lines diverged before age 5 weeks, and significant (P < .05) neuropathology in the hindbrain of 24-week-old mice was quantifiable. Conclusions and Relevance: The assessment of disease progression using 3 criteria showed that disease onset in PS19 mice is too variable to obtain reliable measurements for drug discovery research. However, the reproducibility of tau prion formation in young Tg(MAPT*P301S+/+) mice establishes a rapid assay for compound efficacy in vivo.
Importance: Accumulation of the protein tau is a defining characteristic of several neurodegenerative diseases. Thorough assessment of transgenic (Tg) mouse lines that replicate this process is critical for establishing the models used for testing anti-tau therapeutics in vivo. Objective: To define a consistent mouse model of disease for use in future compound efficacy studies. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this time course study, cohorts of Tg and control mice were euthanized at defined intervals. Collected brains were bisected down the midline. One half was frozen and used to measure the tauprion content, while the other half was fixed for immunostaining with anti-tau antibodies. All mice were maintained at the Hunters Point Animal Facility at the University of California, San Francisco, and all experiments were performed at the Mission Bay Campus of the University of California, San Francisco. Study animals were PS19, homozygous and hemizygous Tg(MAPT*P301S), and B6/J mice. The study dates were August 9, 2010, to October 3, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Tau prions were measured using a cell-based assay. Neuropathology was measured by determining the percentage area positive for immunostaining in defined brain regions. A separate cohort of mice was aged until each mouse developed neurological signs as determined by trained animal technicians to assess mortality. Results: A total of 1035 mice were used in this time course study. These included PS19 mice (51.2% [126 of 246] male and 48.8% [120 of 246] female), Tg(MAPT*P301S+/+) mice (52.3% [216 of 413] male, 43.8% [181 of 413] female, and 3.9% [16 of 413] undetermined), Tg(MAPT*P301S+/-) mice (51.8% [101 of 195] male and 48.2% [94 of 195] female), and B6/J mice (49.7% [90 of 181] male and 50.3% [91 of 181] female). While considerable interanimal variability in neuropathology, disease onset, and tauprion formation in the PS19 mice was observed, all 3 measures of disease were more uniform in the Tg(MAPT*P301S+/+) mice. Comparing tauprion formation in Tg(MAPT*P301S+/+) mice with B6/J controls, the 95% CIs for the 2 mouse lines diverged before age 5 weeks, and significant (P < .05) neuropathology in the hindbrain of 24-week-old mice was quantifiable. Conclusions and Relevance: The assessment of disease progression using 3 criteria showed that disease onset in PS19 mice is too variable to obtain reliable measurements for drug discovery research. However, the reproducibility of tauprion formation in young Tg(MAPT*P301S+/+) mice establishes a rapid assay for compound efficacy in vivo.
Authors: A Probst; J Götz; K H Wiederhold; M Tolnay; C Mistl; A L Jaton; M Hong; T Ishihara; V M Lee; J Q Trojanowski; R Jakes; R A Crowther; M G Spillantini; K Bürki; M Goedert Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: David W Sanders; Sarah K Kaufman; Sarah L DeVos; Apurwa M Sharma; Hilda Mirbaha; Aimin Li; Scarlett J Barker; Alex C Foley; Julian R Thorpe; Louise C Serpell; Timothy M Miller; Lea T Grinberg; William W Seeley; Marc I Diamond Journal: Neuron Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Atsushi Aoyagi; Carlo Condello; Jan Stöhr; Weizhou Yue; Brianna M Rivera; Joanne C Lee; Amanda L Woerman; Glenda Halliday; Sjoerd van Duinen; Martin Ingelsson; Lars Lannfelt; Caroline Graff; Thomas D Bird; C Dirk Keene; William W Seeley; William F DeGrado; Stanley B Prusiner Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Florian Eckenweber; Jose Medina-Luque; Tanja Blume; Christian Sacher; Gloria Biechele; Karin Wind; Maximilian Deussing; Nils Briel; Simon Lindner; Guido Boening; Barbara von Ungern-Sternberg; Marcus Unterrainer; Nathalie L Albert; Andreas Zwergal; Johannes Levin; Peter Bartenstein; Paul Cumming; Axel Rominger; Günter U Höglinger; Jochen Herms; Matthias Brendel Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 8.322
Authors: Cara L Croft; Pedro E Cruz; Daniel H Ryu; Carolina Ceballos-Diaz; Kevin H Strang; Brittany M Woody; Wen-Lang Lin; Michael Deture; Edgardo Rodríguez-Lebrón; Dennis W Dickson; Paramita Chakrabarty; Yona Levites; Benoit I Giasson; Todd E Golde Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Jennifer A Macdonald; Iraad F Bronner; Lesley Drynan; Juan Fan; Annabelle Curry; Graham Fraser; Isabelle Lavenir; Michel Goedert Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 7.801
Authors: Kathleen M McAvoy; Hameetha Rajamohamed Sait; Galina Marsh; Michael Peterson; Taylor L Reynolds; Jake Gagnon; Sarah Geisler; Prescott Leach; Chris Roberts; Ellen Cahir-McFarland; Richard M Ransohoff; Andrea Crotti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aydan Kahriman; James Bouley; Thomas W Smith; Daryl A Bosco; Amanda L Woerman; Nils Henninger Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 7.801
Authors: Chelsey Jenna LeBlang; Maria Medalla; Nicholas William Nicoletti; Emma Catherine Hays; James Zhao; Jenifer Shattuck; Anna Lourdes Cruz; Benjamin Wolozin; Jennifer Irene Luebke Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 5.152