| Literature DB >> 29059200 |
Linchuan Fang1, Jun Tong1, Yanfang Dong1, Dongyun Xu1, Jing Mao1, Yuan Zhou1.
Abstract
Rhododendron spp. is an important ornamental species that is widely cultivated for landscape worldwide. Heat stress is a major obstacle for its cultivation in south China. Previous studies on rhododendron principally focused on its physiological and biochemical processes, which are involved in a series of stress tolerance. However, molecular or genetic properties of rhododendron's response to heat stress are still poorly understood. The phenotype and chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters of four rhododendron cultivars were compared under normal or heat stress conditions, and a cultivar with highest heat tolerance, "Yanzhimi" (R. obtusum) was selected for transcriptome sequencing. A total of 325,429,240 high quality reads were obtained and assembled into 395,561 transcripts and 92,463 unigenes. Functional annotation showed that 38,724 unigenes had sequence similarity to known genes in at least one of the proteins or nucleotide databases used in this study. These 38,724 unigenes were categorized into 51 functional groups based on Gene Ontology classification and were blasted to 24 known cluster of orthologous groups. A total of 973 identified unigenes belonged to 57 transcription factor families, including the stress-related HSF, DREB, ZNF, and NAC genes. Photosynthesis was significantly enriched in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway, and the changed expression pattern was illustrated. The key pathways and signaling components that contribute to heat tolerance in rhododendron were revealed. These results provide a potentially valuable resource that can be used for heat-tolerance breeding.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29059200 PMCID: PMC5653301 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Phenotype of four rhododendron cultivars under heat treatment.
38°C/35°C (day/night) treatment of four rhododendron cultivars. YZM, R. obtusum “Yanzhimi”; XJP, R.hybridum “Xiajinpao”; JP, R.hybridum “Jinpao”; YC, R.hybridum “Yanchun”.
Fig 2Survival rates of leaves and status of the ChlF parameters.
A. Fo; B. Fv/Fm; C. Fv’/Fm’; D. Survival rates of leaves. YZM, R. obtusum “Yanzhimi”; XJP, R.hybridum “Xiajinpao”; JP, R.hybridum “Jinpao”; YC, R.hybridum “Yanchun”.
Summary of R. obtusum ‘Yanzhimi’assembled transcripts and unigenes properties.
| Sample | raw_reads | clean_reads | raw_bases | clean_bases | Q30(%) | %GC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0h_4 | 25,837,332 | 22,846,888 | 9.37E+09 | 7.98E+09 | 97.00401 | 46.5 |
| 0h_6 | 55,402,556 | 49,908,900 | 2.01E+10 | 1.75E+10 | 97.30411 | 47 |
| 0h_7 | 25,511,120 | 22,563,320 | 9.25E+09 | 7.9E+09 | 97.12327 | 46.5 |
| 4h_1 | 42,939,396 | 38,753,828 | 1.56E+10 | 1.36E+10 | 97.25786 | 47 |
| 4h_3 | 25,631,036 | 23,100,858 | 9.3E+09 | 8.1E+09 | 97.42258 | 46.5 |
| 4h_6 | 44,840,326 | 40,690,620 | 1.63E+10 | 1.43E+10 | 97.4354 | 48 |
| 24h_3 | 38,653,096 | 35,377,014 | 1.4E+10 | 1.24E+10 | 97.61504 | 45.5 |
| 24h_4 | 54,343,006 | 49,226,880 | 1.97E+10 | 1.73E+10 | 97.4226 | 46.5 |
| 24h_6 | 48,396,388 | 42,960,932 | 1.76E+10 | 1.5E+10 | 96.92817 | 46.5 |
The size distribution of transcripts and unigenes of rhododendron transcriptome.
Size distribution of Illumina sequencing transcripts(left). (B) Size distribution of unigenes (right).
| Type | Transcript | Unigene |
|---|---|---|
| N50 | 1,190bp | 1,265 bp |
| N90 | 297 bp | 551 bp |
| Average length | 602 bp | 602 bp |
| Max length | 15,666 bp | 15,666 bp |
| Min length | 201 bp | 201 bp |
| Total bases | 291,988,981 bp | 97,052,187 bp |
| Total contigs | 39,5561 | 92,971 |
| GC_content | 30.06% | 30.06% |
| GC_content_max | 81.74% | 68.80% |
| GCcontent_min | 8.02% | 17.54% |
Fig 3Length distribution and GC content of the assembled transcripts and unigenes.
Functional annotation of rhododendron unigenes by sequence similarity search to Swiss-Prot, Pfam, GO, COG, KEGG and EGGnog database.
| Database for annnotation | Number of unigene annotated | Ratio(%) |
|---|---|---|
| Swiss-Prot | 38,724 | 41.88% |
| Pfam | 24,603 | 26.61% |
| GO | 3,400 | 36.77% |
| COG | 31,769 | 34.35% |
| KEGG | 27,514 | 29.75% |
| EGGnog | 27,956 | 30.23% |
| Total Unigenes | 92,462 | 100% |
Fig 4GO, COG, and KEGG pathway classifications of the R. obtusum transcriptome.
A. Classifications are shown in 3 principal categories and 51 functional groups. B. Distribution of each KEGG pathway number against the KEGG database. Each color represents a KEGG pathway. C. COG functional classification of the R. obtusum transcriptome. The 24 COG category names are indicated, A, RNA processing and modification; K, Transcription; L, Replication, recombination and repair; B, Chromatin structure and dynamics; D, Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning; Y, Nuclear structure; V, Defense mechanisms; T, Signal transduction mechanisms; M, Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; N, Cell motility; Z, Cytoskeleton; W, Extracellular structures; U, Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; O, Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones; X, Mobilome: prophages, transposons; C, Energy production and conversion; G, Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; E, Amino acid transport and metabolism; F, Nucleotide transport and metabolism; H, Coenzyme transport and metabolism; I, Lipid transport and metabolism; P, Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q, Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism; R, General function prediction only; S, Function unknown.
Fig 5Transcript gene family classification of R. obtusum transcriptome.
The number of unigenes identified as transcription factors in rhododendron leaves.
24 h vs ck, Changed log2 ratio of Rhododendron exposed to 40°C for 4 h. B. Changed log2 ratio of Rhododendron exposed to 40°C for 24 h.
| Unigene | Annotation | TFfamily | Top Hit | Log2 ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24h vs ck | 4h vs ck | ||||
| C44421 | AP2 | AP2/EREB | AtAP2 | 3.38 | 4.76 |
| C44420 | AP2 | AP2/EREB | AtAP2 | 3.13 | 6.08 |
| C61022 | DRE element binding | AP2/DREB | AtDREB1D | 3.61 | 4.11 |
| C46630 | DRE element binding | AP2/ DREB | AtDREB1C | 3.99 | 4.94 |
| C41140 | DRE element binding | AP2/ DREB | AtDREB2C | 7.32 | 7.32 |
| C62227 | DRE element binding | AP2/ DREB | AtDREB2A | 8.23 | 3.26 |
| C62226 | DRE element binding | AP2/ DREB | AtDREB2A | 9.11 | 3.40 |
| C85885 | Ethylene-responsive | AP2/ERF | AtERF17 | 8.47 | 8.00 |
| C85886 | Ethylene-responsive | AP2/ERF | AtERF17 | 7.41 | 7.60 |
| C85726 | Ethylene-responsive | AP2/ERF | AtERF53 | 3.61 | 2.07 |
| C56488 | Ethylene-responsive | AP2/ERF | AtERF71 | 5.23 | 2.31 |
| C17302 | Ethylene-responsive | AP2/ERF | OsERF1 | 10.62 | 9.71 |
| C6549 | Ethylene-responsive | AP2/ERF | AtERFL1 | 3.24 | 0.69 |
| C87291 | bZIP | bZIP | AtbZIP44 | 4.82 | 3.23 |
| C84155 | bZIP | bZIP | AtBZIP61 | 4.50 | -0.11 |
| C69287 | bZIP | bZIP | SlHY5 | 6.54 | 5.60 |
| C69286 | bZIP | bZIP | SlHY5 | 9.06 | 6.78 |
| C24020 | E2F | E2F | AtE2FE | 6.41 | 2.90 |
| C51101 | GATA | GATA | AtGATA8 | 2.26 | -1.85 |
| C52862 | Heat stress transcription | HSF | AtHFA6B | 5.64 | 8.90 |
| C75881 | Heat stress transcription | HSF | AtHFB2A | 2.57 | 3.51 |
| C80422 | Heat stress transcription | HSF | AtHSFA2 | 9.52 | 14.19 |
| C63903 | Heat stress transcription | HSF | AtHSFA3 | 6.52 | 5.41 |
| C63905 | Heat stress transcription | HSF | AtHSFA3 | 8.17 | 7.26 |
| C63904 | Heat stress transcription | HSF | AtHSFA3 | 6.62 | 8.25 |
| C63906 | Heat stress transcription | HSF | AtHSFA3 | 7.71 | 7.75 |
| C60158 | MADS-box | MADS | AtFLC | 5.90 | 2.65 |
| C40226 | MADS-box | MADS | OsMADS1 | 6.69 | 5.54 |
| C31525 | MYB domain-containing | MYB | SlMYB1R1 | 2.91 | 2.03 |
| C61539 | MYB domain-containing | MYB | ZmMYB1 | 3.79 | 1.11 |
| C52500 | MYB domain-containing | MYB | AtMYB12 | 4.91 | -2.57 |
| C14251 | MYB domain-containing | MYB | AtMYB21 | 7.74 | 3.63 |
| C30941 | MYB domain-containing | MYB | NA | 3.31 | 0.75 |
| C81022 | NAC domain-containing | NAC | AtNAC2 | 5.49 | 2.61 |
| C45824 | NAC domain-containing | NAC | AtNAC2 | 4.20 | 4.81 |
| C61024 | NAC domain-containing | NAC | AtNAC29 | 7.00 | 6.43 |
| C14207 | NAC domain-containing | NAC | AtNAC72 | 2.26 | 1.47 |
| C65230 | NAC domain-containing | NAC | AtNAC8 | 2.21 | 1.40 |
| C72455 | Ethylene-responsive | NAC | AtABR1 | 4.66 | 1.53 |
| C86364 | WRKY | WRKY | AtWRKY33 | 3.30 | 3.04 |
| C86362 | WRKY | WRKY | NA | 8.10 | 7.27 |
| C51799 | WRKY | WRKY | AtWRKY51 | 2.44 | 2.36 |
| C52443 | WRKY | WRKY | AtWRKY42 | 7.39 | 5.48 |
| C47837 | WRKY | WRKY | AtWRKY44 | 5.19 | 2.00 |
| C85009 | C3H1domain-containing | Znf | OsC3H17 | 3.10 | 1.53 |
| C32262 | C3H1domain-containing | Znf | AtC3H2 | 6.76 | 6.22 |
| C43242 | C3H1domain-containing | Znf | OsC3H13 | 3.69 | 4.28 |
| C60868 | C3H1domain-containing | Znf | AtC3H48 | 6.36 | 6.94 |
| C65939 | Zinc finger protein | Znf | AtZAT10 | 5.59 | 5.94 |
| C36936 | Zinc finger protein | Znf | AtZAT8 | 6.99 | 8.89 |
| C36935 | Zinc finger protein | Znf | AtZAT11 | 8.34 | 8.60 |
| C36937 | Zinc finger protein | Znf | AtZAT8 | 10.99 | 9.83 |
Fig 6qRT–PCR analysis of TFs in response to different heat stresses.
Three bio-replicates and tech-replicates were performed. Data are presented as means±SD.
Fig 7Enrichment of photosynthetic passway and relative unigene cluster heatmap.
A. KEGG-illustrated photosynthetic passway was significantly enriched in 24-h heat treatment compared with the control. Red color indicates that the unigenes were up-regulated significantly, green color indicates that the unigenes were down-regulated significantly, and gray color indicates that the unigenes were unchanged. B. Heat map cluster of photosynthesis passway unigenes in rhododendron.