Literature DB >> 29058952

Increased arterial stiffness in children with congenital heart disease.

Anna-Luisa Häcker1,2, Barbara Reiner1,2, Renate Oberhoffer1,2, Alfred Hager1, Peter Ewert1, Jan Müller1,2.   

Abstract

Objective Central systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a measure of arterial stiffness and strongly associated with atherosclerosis and end-organ damage. It is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality than peripheral SBP. In particular, for children with congenital heart disease, a higher central SBP might impose a greater threat of cardiac damage. The aim of the study was to analyse and compare central SBP in children with congenital heart disease and in healthy counterparts. Patients and methods Central SBP was measured using an oscillometric method in 417 children (38.9% girls, 13.0 ± 3.2 years) with various congenital heart diseases between July 2014 and February 2017. The test results were compared with a recent healthy reference cohort of 1466 children (49.5% girls, 12.9 ± 2.5 years). Results After correction for several covariates in a general linear model, central SBP of children with congenital heart disease was significantly increased (congenital heart disease: 102.1 ± 10.2 vs. healthy reference cohort: 100.4 ± 8.6, p < .001). The analysis of congenital heart disease subgroups revealed higher central SBP in children with left heart obstructions (mean difference: 3.6 mmHg, p < .001), transpositions of the great arteries after arterial switch (mean difference: 2.2 mmHg, p = .017) and univentricular hearts after total cavopulmonary connection (mean difference: 2.1 mmHg, p = .015) compared with the reference. Conclusion Children with congenital heart disease have significantly higher central SBP compared with healthy peers, predisposing them to premature heart failure. Screening and long-term observations of central SBP in children with congenital heart disease seems warranted in order to evaluate the need for treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; arterial stiffness; congenital heart disease; systolic blood pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29058952     DOI: 10.1177/2047487317737174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  6 in total

1.  Comprehensive Characterization of Arterial and Cardiac Function in Marfan Syndrome-Can Biomarkers Help Improve Outcome?

Authors:  Constance G Weismann; Joanna Hlebowicz; Anna Åkesson; Petru Liuba; Katarina Hanseus
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Web-Based Motor Intervention to Increase Health-Related Physical Fitness in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  Michael Meyer; Adalheidur Hreinsdottir; Anna-Luisa Häcker; Leon Brudy; Renate Oberhoffer; Peter Ewert; Jan Müller
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Chronic Disease Burden After Congenital Heart Surgery: A 47-Year Population-Based Study With 99% Follow-Up.

Authors:  Alireza Raissadati; Jari Haukka; Tommi Pätilä; Heta Nieminen; Eero Jokinen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Diminished Endothelial Function but Normal Vascular Structure in Adults with Tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Daniel Goeder; Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz; Leon Brudy; Laura Willinger; Michael Meyer; Peter Ewert; Jan Müller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Factors Associated with Mutations: Their Matching Rates to Cardiovascular and Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Hannah B Lucas; Ian McKnight; Regan Raines; Abdullah Hijazi; Christoph Hart; Chan Lee; Do-Gyoon Kim; Wei Li; Peter H U Lee; Joon W Shim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Arterial stiffness in childhood: A predictor for later cardiovascular disease?

Authors:  Fariba Ahmadizar; Trudy Voortman
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 7.804

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.