Frank G Shellock1, Armaan Zare2, Brian M Ilfeld3, John Chae4, Robert B Strother5. 1. Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. 4. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. SPR Therapeutics, LLC, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an FDA-cleared pain treatment. Occasionally, fragments of the lead (MicroLead, SPR Therapeutics, LLC, Cleveland, OH, USA) may be retained following lead removal. Since the lead is metallic, there are associated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) risks. Therefore, the objective of this investigation was to evaluate MRI-related issues (i.e., magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts) for various lead fragments. METHODS: Testing was conducted using standardized techniques on lead fragments of different lengths (i.e., 50, 75, and 100% of maximum possible fragment length of 12.7 cm) to determine MRI-related problems. Magnetic field interactions (i.e., translational attraction and torque) and artifacts were tested for the longest lead fragment at 3 Tesla. MRI-related heating was evaluated at 1.5 Tesla/64 MHz and 3 Tesla/128 MHz with each lead fragment placed in a gelled-saline filled phantom. Temperatures were recorded on the lead fragments while using relatively high RF power levels. Artifacts were evaluated using T1-weighted, spin echo, and gradient echo (GRE) pulse sequences. RESULTS: The longest lead fragment produced only minor magnetic field interactions. For the lead fragments evaluated, physiologically inconsequential MRI-related heating occurred at 1.5 Tesla/64 MHz while under certain 3 Tesla/128 MHz conditions, excessive temperature elevations may occur. Artifacts extended approximately 7 mm from the lead fragment on the GRE pulse sequence, suggesting that anatomy located at a position greater than this distance may be visualized on MRI. CONCLUSIONS: MRI may be performed safely in patients with retained lead fragments at 1.5 Tesla using the specific conditions of this study (i.e., MR Conditional). Due to possible excessive temperature rises at 3 Tesla, performing MRI at that field strength is currently inadvisable.
OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an FDA-cleared pain treatment. Occasionally, fragments of the lead (MicroLead, SPR Therapeutics, LLC, Cleveland, OH, USA) may be retained following lead removal. Since the lead is metallic, there are associated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) risks. Therefore, the objective of this investigation was to evaluate MRI-related issues (i.e., magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts) for various lead fragments. METHODS: Testing was conducted using standardized techniques on lead fragments of different lengths (i.e., 50, 75, and 100% of maximum possible fragment length of 12.7 cm) to determine MRI-related problems. Magnetic field interactions (i.e., translational attraction and torque) and artifacts were tested for the longest lead fragment at 3 Tesla. MRI-related heating was evaluated at 1.5 Tesla/64 MHz and 3 Tesla/128 MHz with each lead fragment placed in a gelled-saline filled phantom. Temperatures were recorded on the lead fragments while using relatively high RF power levels. Artifacts were evaluated using T1-weighted, spin echo, and gradient echo (GRE) pulse sequences. RESULTS: The longest lead fragment produced only minor magnetic field interactions. For the lead fragments evaluated, physiologically inconsequential MRI-related heating occurred at 1.5 Tesla/64 MHz while under certain 3 Tesla/128 MHz conditions, excessive temperature elevations may occur. Artifacts extended approximately 7 mm from the lead fragment on the GRE pulse sequence, suggesting that anatomy located at a position greater than this distance may be visualized on MRI. CONCLUSIONS: MRI may be performed safely in patients with retained lead fragments at 1.5 Tesla using the specific conditions of this study (i.e., MR Conditional). Due to possible excessive temperature rises at 3 Tesla, performing MRI at that field strength is currently inadvisable.
Authors: Brian M Ilfeld; Anthony Plunkett; Alice M Vijjeswarapu; Robert Hackworth; Sandeep Dhanjal; Alparslan Turan; Steven P Cohen; James C Eisenach; Scott Griffith; Steven Hanling; Daniel I Sessler; Edward J Mascha; Dongsheng Yang; Joseph W Boggs; Amorn Wongsarnpigoon; Harold Gelfand Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 8.986
Authors: Steven P Cohen; Christopher A Gilmore; Richard L Rauck; Denise D Lester; Robert J Trainer; Thomas Phan; Leonardo Kapural; James M North; Nathan D Crosby; Joseph W Boggs Journal: Mil Med Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Brian M Ilfeld; Rodney A Gabriel; Engy T Said; Amanda M Monahan; Jacklynn F Sztain; Wendy B Abramson; Bahareh Khatibi; John J Finneran; Pia T Jaeger; Alexandra K Schwartz; Sonya S Ahmed Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Brian M Ilfeld; Scott T Ball; Rodney A Gabriel; Jacklynn F Sztain; Amanda M Monahan; Wendy B Abramson; Bahareh Khatibi; Engy T Said; Jesal Parekh; Stuart A Grant; Amorn Wongsarnpigoon; Joseph W Boggs Journal: Neuromodulation Date: 2018-07-19
Authors: Brian M Ilfeld; Engy T Said; John J Finneran; Jacklynn F Sztain; Wendy B Abramson; Rodney A Gabriel; Bahareh Khatibi; Matthew W Swisher; Pia Jaeger; Dana C Covey; Catherine M Robertson Journal: Neuromodulation Date: 2018-08-30