Literature DB >> 29057545

Modelling incremental benefits on complications rates when targeting lower HbA1c levels in people with Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

S A Mostafa1, R L Coleman1, O F Agbaje1, A M Gray2, R R Holman1,3, M A Bethel1.   

Abstract

AIM: Glucose-lowering interventions in Type 2 diabetes mellitus have demonstrated reductions in microvascular complications and modest reductions in macrovascular complications. However, the degree to which targeting different HbA1c reductions might reduce risk is unclear.
METHODS: Participant-level data for Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS) participants with established cardiovascular disease were used in a Type 2 diabetes-specific simulation model to quantify the likely impact of different HbA1c decrements on complication rates. Ten-year micro- and macrovascular rates were estimated with HbA1c levels fixed at 86, 75, 64, 53 and 42 mmol/mol (10%, 9%, 8%, 7% and 6%) while holding other risk factors constant at their baseline levels. Cumulative relative risk reductions for each outcome were derived for each HbA1c decrement.
RESULTS: Of 5717 participants studied, 72.0% were men and 74.2% White European, with a mean (sd) age of 66.2 (7.9) years, systolic blood pressure 134 (16.9) mmHg, LDL-cholesterol 2.3 (0.9) mmol/l, HDL-cholesterol 1.13 (0.3) mmol/l and median Type 2 diabetes duration 9.6 (5.1-15.6) years. Ten-year cumulative relative risk reductions for modelled HbA1c values of 75, 64, 53 and 42 mmol/mol, relative to 86 mmol/mol, were 4.6%, 9.3%, 15.1% and 20.2% for myocardial infarction; 6.0%, 12.8%, 19.6% and 25.8% for stroke; 14.4%, 26.6%, 37.1% and 46.4% for diabetes-related ulcer; 21.5%, 39.0%, 52.3% and 63.1% for amputation; and 13.6%, 25.4%, 36.0% and 44.7 for single-eye blindness.
CONCLUSIONS: These simulated complication rates might help inform the degree to which complications might be reduced by targeting particular HbA1c reductions in Type 2 diabetes.
© 2017 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29057545     DOI: 10.1111/dme.13533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  6 in total

1.  Budget Impact of Improved Diabetes Management by Utilization of Glucose Meters With a Color-Range Indicator-Comparison of Five European Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Katharina Fritzen; Kornelia Basinska; Constantin Stautner; Karl F Braun; Matilde Rubio-Almanza; Antonio Nicolucci; Brian Kennon; Bruno Vergès; Yasser Hosny; Oliver Schnell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-06

2.  Heat Shock Protein 70 Gene Single Nucleotide Polymorphism and Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Is There Any Relationship?

Authors:  Mohammad Zubair; Jamal Ahmad
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  A hybrid Forecast Cost Benefit Classification of diabetes mellitus prevalence based on epidemiological study on Real-life patient's data.

Authors:  Muhammad Noman Sohail; Ren Jiadong; Musa Muhammad Uba; Muhammad Irshad; Wasim Iqbal; Jehangir Arshad; Antony Verghese John
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Evaluating Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled on Basal Insulin: UK ATTAIN Real-World Study.

Authors:  Edward B Jude; Mark Nixon; Caroline O'Leary; Melissa Myland; Nick Gooch; Alka Shaunik; Elisheva Lew
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.945

5.  The Association of Obesity and Microvascular Complications with Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Radojka Bijelic; Jagoda Balaban; Snjezana Milicevic; Sanja Umicevic Sipka
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2020-02

Review 6.  The Potential of Albuminuria as a Biomarker of Diabetic Complications.

Authors:  Pappitha Raja; Alexander P Maxwell; Derek P Brazil
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.727

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.